Ratnesh Vidyarthi
31 May 2015 at 23:52
Dear Sir,
I am helping to one of a village friend who is the Husband of this case,
For extracting money from Husband’s family a 498 A criminal case is lodge in Police Station in year 2006. The Case is under trail & examining to the witnesses.
In 2006, Investigating officer has lodge FIR and taken a written statement of SIX witnesses.
In that one is Husband’s relative. He is telling I have not given any statement in front of Police and he is ready to give the statement in favor of Husband family.
But the Wife, family does not want to call that one witness in court and in trail they appeal to court that we do not call him from my side.
What are the supporting Law and reference on which Husband’s family can call him ?
Expecting the favorable reply on it.
With Regards
Ratnesh V.
Ratnesh Vidyarthi
31 May 2015 at 23:32
Dear Sir,
I am helping to one of a close friend, who is the Husband of this case.
Court trail is in progress for the Criminal Case of 498 A. Statement of the Wife and her family is get recorded in the Court. I have two quires on it.
1. After statement of the person Husband Lawyer is taking cross on it. But in Cross questions Wife and other witness person is adding the story & also making more Ingredient in it. Is it Law full? How to stop it.
2. CJM Court is telling to Husband Law that do not stop for telling to witness in Cross Is it comes in Law.
3. Only wife & brother telling false statement in court. How much gravity it retain.
kailas naik
31 May 2015 at 23:12
i m having 1 month and 20 days delay for filing nenewal of notary certificate.is any case law of supreme court foe condonation of delay .subject of notary only
vinodkumarpal
31 May 2015 at 21:44
U/s 306 of IPC when suit a file of bail application in this section. How many times after crime a file suit regarding bail
Pradeep
31 May 2015 at 20:20
Respected Sir,
My father and my mother both died in 2004 in a road accident.My father during his lifetime executed a WILL. I have applied for Probate of the WILL which is in initial stage. My sister is giving evidence opposing grant of probate. In some court cases they are accepting WILL(wherever WILL is favourable to them). At the same time with the help of police and political people by brother-in-law is occupying my properties(assigned to me as per WILL). For some properties (share in joint properties) assigned to me, boundaries are not clearly mentioned due to which injunction suit is not possible and which are occupied by my brother-in-law. I have been appointed executor in the WILL. In light of above facts how can we stop them from occupying my properties.
vinodkumarpal
31 May 2015 at 20:11
Please help me experts one of my client has three national permitted car my query is which part of amount charge service tax. Somebody suggest me service tax charge on 60% of net amount is this right.
sksingh
31 May 2015 at 17:22
Ashish and Brijesh being two brothers are the owners having equal share of a commercial premises from where they are carrying their business. Ashish died in 1980 leaving a Will wherein he bequeaths all that he owns to his wife "W". Brijesh continues to carry on business from the said shop. Brijesh in or about 1990 applies for mutation of the share of Ashish in the said shop to his name on the basis of a registered relinquishment deed executed by Ashish in favour of Brijesh prior to his death and notice of which application is given by the Municipal Authority to W as the legal heir of Ashish, asking her no objection. W neither gives her no objection nor writes back to the municipal authority. W dies in 1994. He only child, a son S receives notice in 1995 of another application by Brijesh for mutation of the share of Ashish in the aforesaid premises to his name on the basis of the relinquishment deed aforesaid. S institutes a suit in 1995 for declaration that the relinquishment deed on the basis whereof Brijesh is claiming mutation is forged and fabricated. Brijesh sets up a plea of the claim in suit being barred by time. Is the plea of Brijesh correct that present suit is time barred ?
Responsible Citizen
31 May 2015 at 16:00
Hi,
There is a case undergoing in DRT under SARFAESI, I am not the borrower, however I am the Aggrieved tenant of more than a century old because of the fraud done by the borrower in sync with Bank officials, I have already filed a case in DRT, however i feel to have very less chances of any relief from DRT, can i simultaneously file a relief suit with High Court or i have to wait till the verdict comes from DRT. Please advice so that i can save my house .
Member (Account Deleted)
31 May 2015 at 15:20
As sec 308 ipc is non compundable offence is there any option for settle down the case before trials if the victim hav no complaints.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cancellation of mutation entries
Hi Experts,
A company purchased an Agricultural Land in Mumbai-Maharashtra, the directors of the company are not the farmers, the company did not get the certificate from the farmers before purchasing the property. Now the 7/12 extracts and Property Card has the bears the company's name, but the land is in possession of Mr. X in spite of the sale between the land owners and the company.
How can the mutations entries be cancelled?
Is the purchase legal or illegal?
Who is at the fault Land-Owner/ Company/ Tehsildar or the Registrar as he registered the documents of title without verifying the documents, Can Mr. X file an FIR against them?
Regards,
Rizwan Shaikh