DS Vicky
15 June 2015 at 16:21
Dear Experts,
As Delhi High Court in the mater of Brij Mohan Gupta Vs The Registrar Of Societies (2012) had laid down that the requirement introduced by the respondent with regard to the desirous persons not being related to each other by way of blood relation, or otherwise, is found to be illegal and unenforceable !!!
Can any one put some light whether that means such a clause is no ore required to be included in the Affidavit of the desirous person, while registering society in the NCR of Delhi.
And members from the same family can form a society ?
Anonymous
15 June 2015 at 16:19
I got married and lived just for 10 days..when I came to know they cheated us by having previous relationship my family demanded them to answer..they agreed for mutual divorce...then they didn't come for court..now am planning to marry still I got only my ex party..it is already one full year after applying for divorce..what should I do now..is ex party is enough
ravisharma
15 June 2015 at 16:06
I purchased e-stamp to register a resale flat I bought in Indirapuram, ghaziabad. The property address on the e-stamp was given as ahinsa khand 2,Indirapuram ghaziabad. However, this property is on the land if village kanawani which comes under the jurisdiction of Gautam Buddh Nagar. the sub-registrar (GB Nagar) did not register the sale deed quoting the wrong address. How can this be rectified?
Anonymous
15 June 2015 at 15:15
Dada ki jamin par uske datak putra ka kya adhikar hoga....jabki uske pas koi resister godnama ni h..
Ashish Pandey
15 June 2015 at 14:57
Hello Sir/Mam,
My father has been residing at Mumbai in a chawl since 1985. He applied for change in address over his Voting card along with the corresponding Voter list in the year 1995. Based on his application he received the acknowledgement receipt by filling form8 for address change and the original Voting Card too. (Both of these original documents we have kept safely).
On the issued Voting card his new address was mentioned correctly but they did not update the same address in their record (based on which they provide 7-12 UTAARAA). We did not come to know the mistake as we had the original voting card over which correct address was mentioned. But the record at their end had been reflecting the previous address till the year 2007 and then after they updated their record. Now our room has come under redevelopment plan by SRA and they are compulsorily asking for my father’s voting card/ (7-12 Utaaraa)as an address proof of our current address. So we requested to the ‘Election Officer’ (Old Custom House, Churchgate, Mumbai) to make changes in their record or give a letter against this issue, but they just simply reverted back that they cannot modify the previous record , also they don’t have any record as ‘Chinchpokli Legislative Assembly' has dissolved to ‘Byculla Legislative Assembly'.
In this context, to whom may I consult to escalate the issue so that I can prove my father’s existence over this address as this is the mandatory document required by BMC and if this issue will not get resolved our candidature may get canceled. So please suggest the possible solutions.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Ashish Pandey
S.ROHAN KRISHNA
15 June 2015 at 14:41
SIR,is there any bar if a suit filed for eviction of a tenant in a civil court for the below the amount mentioned in ap rent control act plz give me rply
thank-you
guddu
15 June 2015 at 14:20
I HAVE FILED CIVIL SUIT ON LAND DISPUTE FOR INTERIM INJUNCTION. MY DEFENDANT HAS ALSO MOVED AN APPLICATION FOR SOME INTERIM PRAYER WHICH IS COMPLETELY OPPOSITE TO MY PRAYER. LOWER COURT AFTER HEARING BOTH PARTIES WITH COMMON ORDER COURT ALLOWED MY APPLICATION WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. I HAVE APPEALED IN HIGHER COURT REGARDING THE CONDITION IMPOSED ON ME. LOWER COURT ORDER WAS CONFIRMED BY DIVISION BENCH OF HIGH COURT AFTER HEARING BOTH PARTIES. NOW MY DEFENDANT HAS MOVED AN APPLEATE COURT WITH DELAY IN CONDONATION APPLICATION WITH REVISION APPLICATION TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LOWER COURT. MY LAWYER HAS OBJECTED THE DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION THAT MY OPPONENT WAS WELL AWARE ABOUT THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER COURT AND HE WAS DEFENDING THAT ORDER TILL DIVISION BENCH OF HIGH COURT. ONCE DIVISION BENCH HAS CONFIRMED THE LOWER COURT ORDER, NOW IT IS NOT OPEN TO CHALLENGE VERY SAME ORDER IN APPEALATE COURT AND IT WILL OPERATE AS RES JUDICATA. APPELATE COURT ALLOWED DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION AND PASSED THE ORDER THAT RES JUDICATA WILL BE CONSIDERED DURING REVISION APPLICAITON. IF APPEALTE COURT HELD DURING REVISION APPLICATION THAT RES JUDICATA WILL NOT OPERATE. DOES APPEALTE COURT HAS POWER TO OVER RULE THE DECISION OF LOWER COURT WHICH IS CONFIRMED UPTO THE DIVISION BENCH OF HIGH COURT. what to do now
jpurus
15 June 2015 at 13:43
3 Sons and 4 Daughters are the legal heirs of the property. Father has expired in 1990 and 3 Sons had changed the patta from father to their names in 2007, without the consent of 4 Daughters. In 2013, all the 4 daughters challenged against the patta in Tahsildar office and later RDO has cancelled the existing patta due to all the legal heirs were not included in the fathers patta property. Now the 3 sons went for appeal in District Revenue Officer office challenging the RDO verdict.
My question is…
1) What would be the legal proceedings thereafter? How to end their appeal.
2) How do the 4 daughters get immediate remedy from this and get their own partitions.
3) 4 daughters need Joint Patta as a priority? What is the process?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Purchasing agricultural land in udipi, karnataka
Hi All,
I and my wife are planning to purchase agricultural land in Udipi, Karnataka from a cousin.
The land is 15 cents.
We do not hold any other agricultural land anywhere.
We both work in private companies with income more than 2 lakhs.
Is there any rule which allows agricultural land up to 15 cents to be purchased by non-agriculturalist with income more than 2 lakhs like us?
Thanks,
Ajay