Ankit
17 June 2016 at 11:14
Hi,
I am having a strong case in front of the magistrate under section 211 IPC i.e. case against false charges and fake witnesses.
Learned magistrate is demanding for rulings in 211 IPC favor, please provide me some rulings in favor of 211 IPC.
Currently I am having two rulings:
1. M.L. Sethi vs Kapur 1966
2. Abdul Rehman vs K.M.Anees
Please also suggest if the above two rulings are in the favor of 211 IPC or not?
Kailash jha
17 June 2016 at 09:45
Hi,
I am kailash jha i was working with a comany from last 1 year 4 months and resigned from the same on 10th june 2016 without serving notice period of 30 days and joined a new company on 13th june 2016. Now the problem is that my previous supervisor is continuously sending me mail that i have to serve the required notice period but it is clearly mentioned in the offer letter which i got at the time of joining that if i don't serve the notice period i have to pay for it, and i am ready to buy it. But he is forcing me to serve the required notice period and saying me that if i join any other company before 9th july they will do a dual employment case against me. Will there will be any problem in background check up with my current company? Advise me please what should I do. ..
Thanks
Kailash jha
swapnil
17 June 2016 at 09:39
What is kulkayada?
In which year the kulkayada act stops in Maharashtra.?
Member (Account Deleted)
17 June 2016 at 09:34
I Had purchase Flat in Dombivali in Grampanchayat Area.Details as per below -
Area - 580 Sq Ft. (Built up)
Floor - 1st Flr
Building total Floor - Ground + 4
Flat booked in yr 2011 & Construction completed in yr 2014
1) At the time of booking builder said this project is approved by leading nationalised bank (Bank of Maharashtra), hence I booked my flat in yr 2011 by paying booking amount Rs. 5,00,000/- & later on after six month when I approached to the bank for loan, bank manager refused to accept my file because of following reasons -
1) Fake N.A. certificate (which was not issued by collector office
2) Builder have constructed 4th floor + ground floor which is illegal because plan was approved by Grampanchayat for only G + 3. (in ground floor stilt parking + three floor)
later on because of this issue even co-operative banks also not ready to provide loan for this project. govt also restricted to all banks to provide loan in this area & also for registration.
later on all builders somehow managed to get loan from private finance co. etc (at higher rate of interest 13 - 14%). I also taken loan from private finance co at 14% interest and paid balance amount to the builder. now builder is asking for extra money for delay in payment otherwise he is not ready to give possession. because of this issue builder have taken 4 yrs to complete project & give possession.
later on builder have obtained temporary N.A certificate from collector office.
Please advice.
Kalyan Ghosh
17 June 2016 at 09:25
My son had a car in Hyderabad bearing Regn No AP82CD4906.During initial registration a life time tax of about Rs 95000 was paid in Hyderabad.The car has been moved to Kolkata in December and reregistered at Kolkata by paying as per rules again a life time tax of Rs 50000 plus incidental charges.Accordingly new Smart Card was issued from Kolkata incorporating the change in address of the owner in Kolkata and new Smart Number Plate was fixed.
IMPORTANT POINT- But interestingly new Registration No bearing WB NO was not given and the Registration No REMAINS the same OLD AP82CD4906.
When the Public Vehicle Officer was asked about this he intimated that this procedure is maintained and after 6 months the new Regn No bearing WB No will be given which means again a fee for new Smart Plate bearing new registration no will be charged.
The problem is more as meanwhile car insurance has to be renewed,
1) With the old Regn No of AP82CD4906(WB NO NOT YET ALLOTTED) the Insurance Companies IN KOLKATA will mention in Renewed Policy Document the Regn Office as Ranga Reddy in AP and NOT Kolkata in West Bengal which will be some deviation from fact as Andhra Pradesh REGN OFFICES HAVE NOW NO CONNECTION WITH THIS CAR AP82CD4906,AS AFTER ISSUANCE OF NO OBJECTION CERTFICATE FOR INTERSTATE TRANSFER THE NEW REGN OFFICE IS KOLKATA AND NOT ANY AP OFFICE.
The Insurance Companies view is that their computer setting will not permit any AP No having registration office in Kolkata(probably their view is correct)
My question is whether after receiving life time tax of Rs 50000 again in Kolkata WHY THE NEW Regn No bearing WB No will be not be issued immediately and whether KOLKATA OFFICE CAN ISSUE Smart Card bearing Andhra Number.
With thanks intimating the remedial procedure.
adv.bharat @ PUNE
17 June 2016 at 05:02
I want to purchase MAHADA flat.
What kind of document i need to cheque before purchase it?
Nasreen
17 June 2016 at 01:42
Hello
I would first like to Thxsss all team of lawyers club India for giving a helping hand in our bad and crucial times.
Respected sir my mom is 60+[age] v had property and its turned into slum [mahada]system flats，where as my expired just before completion of bldg flats were given to all children [4kids]and even money was divided in equal share，模拟 now my brothers r not concerned with mom bcox they want to keep their wife happy.
Elder bro is residin with family at my mOMS house and he has given his flat on rent ,sometimes he harrases mom to sell her flat and give his share,but wen he leaves home his wife starts bad words harrassing her[she even says stripper to my mom thry r not leaving the house and going since4years they hav been staying and treating vey bad ,how can v remove them
Inspite of sayng several times they r not leaving house, my mom DId go to police but no fIR nor action has been taken .
Plzzz beg of u to help my mom or else she will die.
Thanking you
chetan Jadhav
17 June 2016 at 00:09
I have signed 2 years one sided bond in an IT company.
compensation amount is 2 lakh + 25% interest. as company stated that they are paying 20000 per month on our training.
company trained us only for 20 days and asked to go live on work.
now i need to leave the job.
i have joined 2 months before.
please advice.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Contradictions in cross vs pleadings
1. If there is any admission already in pleadings, is it necessary to confirm that in cross-exam?
2. If statements in cross are contradictory to pleadings, is it necessary to further cross/confront with this contradiction or can we use any of the two to our advantage without confronting/further cross?
Please provide views and judgements to support. Thanks