v v ramana
23 August 2017 at 11:10
Hi Team,
my elder brother detained from Intermediate regarding caught by principal for fogery of principal signature on exam hall ticket.
later he ran away from home for 4 years. I trace him and took him back to home. Recently i knew that he stole my study certificates (Engineering) and made forgery and working with those fake certificates. When I ask him to surrender my certificates back, he was not ready to give and now he is threatning me if I go to police station also he will ready to ruin my life by involving me in this case.
I got xerox copies of those fake certificates also.
Please advice me How my certificates bring back from him and how I escape for any problems in future regarding those fake certificates if he involved me in that case.
Thanks in advance
Anonymous
23 August 2017 at 10:42
Sir,
Due to failure in conciliation proceedings my grievance has been referred to Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal by Conciliation Officer. During first hearing date I have submitted my statement of claims, but no one came from Management side for the first court hearing.
Sir, kindly guide me;
(i) In the event of non attendnace from Management side in the first hearing, Will CGIT send Notice along with my statement of claims to the Management?
(ii) Is in the second hearing, Management submit its counter claim ?
(iii) What is the step by step procedure in the CGI (like submisison of statement of claims, counter claims, rejoinder, workman evidence etc.) and how much time will be given in between in each step
Kindly guide me.
Sudhin2218
23 August 2017 at 10:05
Hello All
We have a property of 100X40 residential site. it was originally purchased by my grandmother and father jointly in the year 1948. In the year 1991 my father passed away his undivided share devolved to me, my mother and my 3 sisters. Though there was no partition my grandmother sold her half share of the property to stranger. Stranger has filed a partition suit which is currently pending before the court.
In addition to that my grandmother filed an another case in 2007, asking a relief of partition 7/12th of the schedule A property (she has right of half share (schedule B) of schedule A property and also 1 share in my father's share property(schedule C)) and put Stranger in possession schedule B property (which was sold by my grandmother) . In the plaint copy Schedule explained as below.
Schedule A: 100 X 40 site (entire property)
Schedule B: 50 X40 site (My grandmother's share of A schedule property, which was sold to stranger)
Schedule C: 50 X 40 site ( My father's share of A schedule property)
Since was not in town, we didn't contested the case properly. there was preliminary decree judgement came in partially favor of my grandmother as below.
My Grand mother is entitled for 7/12th Schedule Properties.
Schedule B property cannot be allotted to stranger, as Property was sold before the partition.
We were not aware of this judgement. Now after the death of my Gramdmother, Now Plaintiff filed a case (in year 2017) for Final decree proceeding based on "My Grand mother is entitled for 7/12th Schedule Properties." preliminary decree. Now we got to know about this judgement,
My Question is:
I read the entire Judgement. In the Judgement Summary, Hon'ble Judge has clearly mentioned that they are decreeing suit excluding schedule B property and my grandmother is entitled for 1/6th share in father's share (schedule C property).
However in the decree it has mentioned has "My Grand mother is entitled for 7/12th Schedule Properties"
Instead of mentioning only 1/6th share of schedule C property. where it mentioned as schedule properties , which includes schedule A, Schedule B and Schedule C. which is a huge error committed by Judge.
Plaintiff has also wrongly pleaded the total share of the A schedule Property. Because of the following reason.
A schedule property (100X40) was jointly purchased by Plaintiff My grand mother and My father, Both entitled for half share of Schedule A property. Further on the death of My father (year 1991), It is the contention of plaintiff being the mother of My father she also entitled of 1/6th share along with defendant 1to5 (wife and children’s of My father) in my father’s half share of Schedule A property.
Now If we look the number of shares in the schedule A property. One Half share of Plaintiff My grand mother (Schedule B, which already sold to Stranger) and total 6 shares in Father's share.
However Plaintiff filed original suit to carve out of 7/12 shares.
Total number of shares cannot be 12 at all.
Since this decree is in favor plaintiff. there are very much silent about this preliminary decree mistake. Plaintiff has file for Final decree case based on this faulty decree.
How this preliminary decree can be corrected now during Final decree proceedings? As time has already barred to appeal against preliminary decree.
Looking for your Valuable advise, Thanks.
Anonymous
23 August 2017 at 08:19
respected sirs/madams
1. I joined through at GP of 4600 in October 2012. Intimated my current department regarding my application for another GP 4600 post and got NOC for the same.
2. In 2013 i got my first increment in first department and in 2014, i tendered my technical resignation to join the second 4600 GP after 1.5 years in april 2014. in the relieving letter i got pay protection from my first department.
3. in july 2014, i got my pay fixed in the 2nd department. Here i stayed for 2.5 years. and technically resigned to join the third dept after obtaining necessary approvals.
4. since last 1 yr my pay is not fixed after giving many representations. now 3rd dept claims that as i stayed in first dept for 1.5 , pay protection by 2nd dept is wrong. though i was getting protected salary in 2.5 yrs (minus 3 months i.e april to july 2014, due to no pay protection order and service book transfer issues from first dept to second dept)
Anonymous
23 August 2017 at 08:12
Hi
I recently booked a car in Mumbai and had taken a car loan which got disbursed and the car got registered in my name.I was waiting for the delivery but I found that the Car dealer has assigned me an car which was 9 months old.As per his verbal commitment and as per industry standards car should be around 90 days manufactured date.Now I feel cheated and I don't want to take the delivery of the old car..After paying in full why should i settle for a 9 month old car.Can i walk out from this deal ?I want to understand legal view whether can I cancel the deal and its impact
balaji r
23 August 2017 at 07:20
Is it correct to register a Residential Welfare Association by the owners before handing over of flats by the builders? Whether it has legal entity? Whether payments, if made for the purchases of Lifts, Glazing materials etc. can be routed through the Residential Welfare Association Account on
account of introduction of GST if we get GSTN No.? please clarify.
Sidhartha Prakash
23 August 2017 at 06:20
I had bought a property on lease forever in 1990.
Can i execute a sale deed now? Do i have the right to sell it? Or i can execute only a lease deed.
Can i execute a sale deed in favour of any person other than the lessor?
Or i will have to give it back to the lessor only.
LalbhiShaik
23 August 2017 at 05:44
My caste is dudekula but my initial is shaik is there any problem with my initial where i applied for the jobs under obc???
Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh
23 August 2017 at 02:58
Respected Experts,
The Legal Heirs of the deceased (Muslim) have filed Testamentary Petition for the Letter for Administration in the High Court of Bombay. The Legal Heirs did not include the wife and widow of the said deceased in the Testamentary. Petition. The Legal Heir suppressed the true facts before the Honble High Court. The deceased holds several properties in Mumbai wherein in the said petition they even suppressed the same. They just included only two properties excluding the Court matters which were filed in respect to various lands in Mumbai. The legal heirs were well aware that out the 2 properties which have been mentioned in the Schedule of the Property, one property has already been gifted to the widow several years back. In the said petition, they legal heir claimed to be the next of the kin whereas the truth is that the deceased disliked/ disowned them when he was alive. Several complaints have been filed with the Government Authorities against the legal heirs by the deceased. The wife/widow of the deceased wants to intervene in the said Testamentary Petition by filing Caveat and Affidavit in Support of Caveat to claim her rights in the share of the deceased which has been suppressed by the legal heirs.
Question:
1. After filing of the Caveat and Affidavit in Support, what relief can be claimed by the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction Court?
2.Can the widow seek stay over the property which has already been gifted by the deceased?
3.Can the widow file Partition Suit to claim her share in the properties left by the deceased?
4. What will be the outcome of the Testamentary Petition or the Suit?
5. As the legal heirs have suppressed the true facts and lied before the High Court, what action can be taken by the widow and by the Court?
EXPERTS !!! Your advice in this regard, shall be very very high appreciated
Regards,
Mohammed Shaikh
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Advise regarding spouse ground transfer in bank
I am working with bank of india since oct'13 as a clerk. I was promoted to JMGS-1 effective from Feb'17 and was transferred to Ratnagiri zone from Lucknow zone. I was married on Feb 27, 2017 and my husband is also working with Bank of India as a clerk in Dehradun branch. I requested for spouse ground transfer to Dehradun but it wss rejected as promotee officers are not transferred before 2 years in same zone. I however applied for my reversion to clerical cadre and also for transfer to Dehradun at my husband's place. The Head office accepted my request and transferred me to Dehradun giving instructions to Dehradun ZO to decide my further place of posting. The HR dept alloted me Kotdwar branch which is 120 kms far from Dehradun and is not ready to reconsider it anyways even after my several requests. Nobody is ready to listen me even after i have used my spouse ground transfer and reversion putting my career at stake. I am still at a far place from my husband and its such a mental harassment for me since few momths. I want to file a petition on basis of GOI guidelines of keeping the spouses at same station if they are working in the same department. Please guide me.