R_PVK
10 August 2009 at 12:50
dear sir
my father belong to OBC category but he has given my name in school in the general category which i intend to change
since i got married and have two childrens and i want to pass on the benefit to my childrens .can you please tell me the procedure. secondly my daughter is now in 10th whether is it mandatory to produce the OBC CERTIFICATE now itself during admission or can i even produce after a year or so for the benefit pl suggest?
regards
R_PVK
SHYAMSUNDAR
10 August 2009 at 10:39
Dear Friends,
Plz let me know if we can proceed u.s.138 of N.I.Act if the Bank Memo causes the reason to be "Cash Credit / Overdraft condition not fullfilled"
Plz let me know if any supporting Case law/Citation.
Thanks in advance.
R Bajaj
10 August 2009 at 10:13
Dear Sir,
I would like to know that is it better to buy a house with one's terminal benifits or seek an appropriate bank loan under following constraints:
Terminal Benifits 50 Lakhs
House cost 47 Lakhs
Individual in 30% tax bracket and will continue to be so for next 4 years.
Regards
Bajaj
GIRISH AGRAWAL
10 August 2009 at 02:45
IS POSSIABLE TO FILE CASE U/S IPC 420 & N I ACT 138 OF SINGLE CHEQUE ?
GIRISH AGRAWAL
MAHESH
09 August 2009 at 23:42
MY WIFE,BANKING SINCE 20YRS WITH SAME BRANCH HAD TAKEN PERSONAL LOAN BY DEPOSITING HER GOLD JEWELLARY RECD DURING HER MARRIAGE,THE LOAN WAS DISBURSED IN MY WIFES PERSONAL A\C WHICH WAS PREPAID FROM HER OWN FUNDS AND LOAN O.S A\C WAS CLOSED-NO DUES LT ISSUED.AT THE TIME OF SIGNING THE LOAN PAPERS I THE HUSBAND WAS ASKED TO SIGN AT PLACE NO 2,BEING 2ndSIGNATORY BY D BR MGR.I HAD TO CLOSE MY A\C OF TRADING BUSINESS WITH THE SAME BANKERS DUE TO LOSSES AND THE SAME BANK AND BRANCH OBTND THE DECREE AGAINST ME AND FIRM, WIFE IS IN NO WAY CONNECTD FOR THE O.S AMT OF THE FIRM,WHEN MY WIFE ASKED THE BANKERS FOR RELEASE OF GOLD ORNMTS,THEY ASKED HER TO PAY SOME AMT WHICH WOULD BE ADJUSTED TOWARDS THE O.S OF THE FIRM.V AGREED-BANKERS REFUSE 2 RELEASE THE JEWELLARY.ALSO OBTND ATTCMNT DECREE 4 ATTACHMNT OF GOLD LYING WITH THE BANK WITHOUT THE INFO OF THE WIFE.ATTACHMNT OBTD STATING GOLD BELONGS TO NO 2-HUSBAND,APPROACHED BANKING OMBDSMN-NO RELIEF,WANT CASE LAWS--WHICH COURT TO APPROACH,CAN CASE OF BR OF TRUST\CHEATING SEC406\420 B FILED AGAINST D BANK.REPLY EARLY AND HAVE MY BLESSING AS I NEED THE JEWLARY FOR MY DAUGTRS MARRAGE AS IN OUR CUSTOMS TRADITION.EARLY S.O.S NEEDED
PRACHI
09 August 2009 at 22:48
pl.provide me format of power of attorney taken by the bank from the borrower when property is mortagrd and on that basis loan has been granted
Ranganath
09 August 2009 at 21:15
Ld cousels,
There are diferent interpretations by courts with regards to fraud on marriage.
Commonly quoted observation is that the extent of fraud should amount to deception due to which the consent of the aggrieved spouse is not a valid consent in light of the fraud.
In my humble opinion, This is a hyper technical view. Please let me know if one spouse come to know about the mis-representation made regarding family status and financial situation and about the father-in-law being subjected to disciplinary action by the govt. due to which he was affected monetarily and depends on others. all these details were concealed before marriage.
I dont think any educated family would liketo contract marriage with a family headed by a tainted person.
Will this be a ground for annulling a marriage due to fraud.
Please clarify
Thanks
Apurva Kumar
09 August 2009 at 20:50
Sir/Mam,
According to police manual identification of seized article at police station is bad/void in eyes of law and such should be discarded in terms of evidence at trial but in a case the I.O of the case did the TIP at the Police station how far acceptable? Ny view forum members? ASAP!
Regards!
AP!
naman k jain
09 August 2009 at 20:24
hello all,
my client's father applied a electricity connection, connection was not issued. but on paper it become enerzies in the mean my client's father has right. my query is this-
1. Is my client a consumer.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 506 (2) of IPC
A person was charged with petty offences (in a neighbours quarrel case) and let-off on bail by the police. As the individual did not receive any summons for the trial, he presumed it to have been time-barred. After a gap of 2 years, now the police has served him summons with a serious section of 506 (2) of IPC [Which I think is to cover-up the delay in forwarding charge sheet to the magistrate and/or pressure from the complainant]. In such a scenario, since 506 (2) is a non-bailable one, on the date of appearance, what are the precautions are to be taken for the accused, before the Magistrate Court?
Thanks & Regards.