bhanumathi
15 September 2009 at 11:11
Sir/Madam,
My clients are christians...they want to file a divorce petition by mutual consent...under which provision the parties can file a divorce petition by mutual consent...riven
chandranil S Belvlakar
15 September 2009 at 10:53
Dear Friends,
What are the compliances required to be done by sub contractor under contract labour Act,1970 as his registration is optional will it be beneficial for contractor if sub contractor gets licenceriven
rahul pandey
15 September 2009 at 10:25
If a person just copy the music of any song then will he be liable for infringement?riven
Abhinay Kumar Shaw
15 September 2009 at 08:38
If a cheque issued by me on 04/09/2008 to the promoter and the same was dishonoured on 16/09/2008.
Can they file any case against me under N.I.Act 138.riven
Abhinay Kumar Shaw
15 September 2009 at 08:22
What is the Time period to file against sombody on basis of N.I. Act 138.riven
Abhinay Kumar Shaw
15 September 2009 at 08:20
On what circumstances i can suit a file Maan Haniriven
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
15 September 2009 at 08:19
Sir,
My clients are trusty of a Tample.
The legal stamp of the tample is misplaced.
In city survey & Municipality name of the owner is different.
Let me clear that such property as known by olders that this tample is marethan 110 years old and it was constructed on the homes donated by nearer people.
there is no any leal documantory evidences are available to any person.
Now it is very urgent requirement to renovate the same.
What are the legal sapes to be taken to avoid any unfair interuptions?
Because there are some GURUS who told that thay have gift papers! but till today thay refused to show.riven
Arun Krishnan
15 September 2009 at 00:55
Do we have any reported cases regarding internet bank frauds in India?
Are our current laws efficient to deal with such cyber bank frauds?
Which country has effective laws regarding the same?riven
Abhinay Kumar Shaw
15 September 2009 at 00:09
I have purchased a flat from a developer.
As per mutual (partly) and written agreement the cost of acquisition was Rs. 5,84,109/- (Rupees Five Lacs Eighty Four Thousands One Hundred and Nine Only) including Registry Fees, Stamp Duty, Lawyers Fees and Extra Works.
I have made payment of Rs. 5,94,025/- .
After calculation I saw that I had paid and issued excess amount against the cost of acquisition that’s why I withdraw all my amount from my saving bank account and one of the issued cheque of Rs. 25,000 was dishonoured due to insufficient balance.
We request the developer many times over the phone that please come and show me the proper statement of account but he did not respond at all.
But after a long time his advocate send me a Demand Notice of Rs. 25,000 along with the Interest @ 24% and threatened me that if I don’t make payment then they will file a case U/S 420 I.P.C.
Statement Showing Details of Transaction relating to Purchase of Flat
Particulars Amt. Amt. Amt. Amount
Cost of proportionate Plot @ Rs. 725/sq.ft. 514,025
(622 Sq.ft. + 14% super builtup (87 sq.ft.) = 709 sq.ft.
Cost of Registry 43,704
Stamp Duty 36600
FeesandStandardUserCharges 6905
Standard User Charges 199
Lawyers Fees 5,00
Cost of Extra Works 21,380 584,109 Self. Cal. Dev. Cal.
Electricals Switches 2550 3400 Dhalai[(112-35.45 Sq.ft.)=76.55 Sq.ft. @ Rs.165/sq.ft.] 12630 12630
Reserve Tank Water Line - 1500
Basin Water Line 1500 1500
Windows - Marble works 20 sq.ft. @ Rs. 70/sq. ft. 1400 1400
Black Stone with Materials 16 sq. ft. @ Rs. 25/sq.ft. 800 800
Tiles with materials (34.58 sq.ft. @ Rs.25/ sq. ft.) - 865
Gyser Line 2500 4500
Engineering Charges for Measurement of Flat - 1500
21380 28095
Date Paticular's Amount
7/5/200 Cheque 25,000
23/05/2007 Cheque 25,000
3/8/2007 Cheque 25,000
3/8/2007 Cheque 25,000 21/07/2007 Cash 25,000
28/07/2008 Cheque 14,025
29/07/2008 Cheque 400,000
30/07/2008 Cash 7,000
12/8/2009 Cheque 23,000
4/9/2008 Cheque 25,000 594,025 Total Excess Payment (9,916)
riven
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Inter State Sale E1
Kindly provide case no/name of H'ble Justice/party involved of recent judgement on disqualification under E-1 for prefixed consignee.riven