Member (Account Deleted)
19 September 2009 at 21:38
Bank pays for blacklisting, threatening customer
C Unnikrishnan | TNN
Mumbai: The next time a bank offers a free credit card, think twice before saying yes. An advocate learnt this the hard way when a bank recently went to the extent of notifying his name as a defaulter with the Credit Information Bureau of (India) Limited (Cibil) even though it was not his fault.
The move meant that the advocate, K P Sreejith, would have found it impossible to avail a bank loan. However, refusing to take things lying down, Sreejith sued the bank, which was then directed by the consumer dispute redressal forum to pay up Rs 25,000 towards ‘mental agony and loss of reputation’ and another Rs 5,000 towards cost of litigation.
In August 2007, Barclay Bank approached Sreejith and offered a free life-time credit card considering his “good payment track record”. Sreejith, who was initially reluctant, accepted the offer. On October 7, 2007, he made a purchase of Rs 918 through the card. A month later, the bank informed Sreejith over phone that he had not made the payment due on November 17. Sreejith claimed that he had not received the statement but promptly paid the amount in accordance with the bank’s instructions. But soon he got the statement, in which where he was charged Rs 300 towards delayed payment. After Sreejith failed to get through to the bank over the phone, he sent an e-mail explaining the situation and requested them waive off the late fee. The bank reverted saying the m at t e r had been forwarded to the department concerned. Even as the dispute was on, the late fee amount accumulated to Rs 2,000 and the bank allegedly sent recovery agents, who threatened Sreejith with dire consequences if the amount was not paid.
On January 4, 2008, the bank sent a letter to Sreejith asking him to pay Rs 734 and suspended his card. In February, the bank wrote saying the card would be permanently withdrawn and details would be forwarded to Cibil. On March 3, the bank carried out its threat after which Sreejith approached the consumer forum. The bank denied issuing any threats and said levying late fee was proper. The bank also said that Cibil is not a defaulters’ list but only a data base of customers’ credit history. The bank filed an affidavit saying the charges were reversed and there was no outstanding, which was intimated to Cibil.
The forum comprising president S P Mahajan and members Jyoti Iyer and S S Patil observed the bank had no regards for RBI directives as complaints to the customer services head was not attended to. “The act of the bank in employing recovery agents is highly deplorable and it appears that the bank has no respect for the rule of the law.’’ the forum added.
_______________________
Please comment
riven
Alok Kumar Sharma
19 September 2009 at 21:11
My clients were working in a factory which was illegally closed down by the employer. Subsequently, State Govt. granted permission to close down with retrospective effect. They were directed to be reinstated with full back wages. Employer has challenged the order before High Court taking a plea that factory is closed. Will my clients be entitled to get the last drawn wages u/s 17 B or not?riven
MM
19 September 2009 at 21:10
Hello,
I stay in kalyan(Maharashtra) & would like to gift the existing Flat to wife , as iam planning to buy 2nd flat. I would like to know the procedure for the same like gift deed , stamp duty , registration etc along expenses & time frame to complete the same.
thanks !!riven
Bharat Jain
19 September 2009 at 20:00
Subject: Mis-Use Of IRDA License by Insurance Company To Attain Sales Targets
With regard to above subject, Please guide if what actions can be taken against the insurance company & how the agent may get compensated for fraud done by the company.
Insurance company has logged in a policy in my agent code with fradulent signature of me.
Also the agent commision of same policy is not paid to the agent. I came to know about after receiving mail from IT Department stating TDS receipt from the Insurance Co.
Pl. Guide
Facts Known to me -
Only IRDA licensed agents can sell Insurance.
Agent is required to submit a confidential report stating insured persons financials & giving true information which is used by the Company to Underwrite the Policy Document.
Signature is forged by the Company Officials.
Immideate Help required in this matter.riven
Member (Account Deleted)
19 September 2009 at 19:23
An agricultural field was sold by the original owner in 1990. The name of original owner exists on 7/12 extract even today. The builder who purchased the land developed it into layout i.e. plots. But did not obtain non agricultural assessment or town planning sanction. Around year 2000 the builder sold the plots to various persons. Now in 2002 land acquisition proceedings started where this land was situated. In the year 2007 the said proceedings culminated in reference under section 30 of land acquisition act. The plot owners are unaware of all these developments. The original owners have not filed reference under section 18. The builder has filed an objectioin in section 30 proceedings. The matter is pending since then in court. Now what is the remedy available with plot owners who came to know about these developments when they tried to mutate their names in 2009. Can they file reference under sec. 18 or file 1(10) c.p.c. application in sec. 30 proceedings. Or file civil suit against original owners and builder.riven
dushyant saini
19 September 2009 at 17:37
sir I want to know how can I take the panel in MACT cases of an insurance companyriven
Dr C Suresh
19 September 2009 at 17:25
Can certiified copies of govt office documents obtained under RTI Act be used as evidence in court ?riven
lalit
19 September 2009 at 16:40
P.S.Subbaraman
19 September 2009 at 16:14
When the Bank has taken possesion of the property under SARFESI by adopting all the procedures . Is the Bank justified in charging interest after taking possession of the property ?riven
P.S.Subbaraman
19 September 2009 at 16:09
Should permission be obtained under the T.N Panchayat Act to install Generators and licence fee payable ?riven
Bank pays for blacklisting, threatening customer
Bank pays for blacklisting, threatening customer
C Unnikrishnan | TNN
Mumbai: The next time a bank offers a free credit card, think twice before saying yes. An advocate learnt this the hard way when a bank recently went to the extent of notifying his name as a defaulter with the Credit Information Bureau of (India) Limited (Cibil) even though it was not his fault.
The move meant that the advocate, K P Sreejith, would have found it impossible to avail a bank loan. However, refusing to take things lying down, Sreejith sued the bank, which was then directed by the consumer dispute redressal forum to pay up Rs 25,000 towards ‘mental agony and loss of reputation’ and another Rs 5,000 towards cost of litigation.
In August 2007, Barclay Bank approached Sreejith and offered a free life-time credit card considering his “good payment track record”. Sreejith, who was initially reluctant, accepted the offer. On October 7, 2007, he made a purchase of Rs 918 through the card. A month later, the bank informed Sreejith over phone that he had not made the payment due on November 17. Sreejith claimed that he had not received the statement but promptly paid the amount in accordance with the bank’s instructions. But soon he got the statement, in which where he was charged Rs 300 towards delayed payment. After Sreejith failed to get through to the bank over the phone, he sent an e-mail explaining the situation and requested them waive off the late fee. The bank reverted saying the m at t e r had been forwarded to the department concerned. Even as the dispute was on, the late fee amount accumulated to Rs 2,000 and the bank allegedly sent recovery agents, who threatened Sreejith with dire consequences if the amount was not paid.
On January 4, 2008, the bank sent a letter to Sreejith asking him to pay Rs 734 and suspended his card. In February, the bank wrote saying the card would be permanently withdrawn and details would be forwarded to Cibil. On March 3, the bank carried out its threat after which Sreejith approached the consumer forum. The bank denied issuing any threats and said levying late fee was proper. The bank also said that Cibil is not a defaulters’ list but only a data base of customers’ credit history. The bank filed an affidavit saying the charges were reversed and there was no outstanding, which was intimated to Cibil.
The forum comprising president S P Mahajan and members Jyoti Iyer and S S Patil observed the bank had no regards for RBI directives as complaints to the customer services head was not attended to. “The act of the bank in employing recovery agents is highly deplorable and it appears that the bank has no respect for the rule of the law.’’ the forum added.
_______________________
Please comment
riven