Anonymous
15 January 2010 at 12:28
A reputed training company which is a partnership firm of 2 partners trains students in IT/TELECOM & soft skills and places students in IT companies. this XYZ company has appointed a HR recruitment company to recruit people place them in the IT company.
This XYZ company is charging the HR company a fixed amt for training to be precise 35 k and proper business agreement is signed between HR co and XYZ compnay.
everywhere there are good and bad students the hard working ones get placed in 3 months and everything is fine the rest hv to wait.
the xyz company has not taken a rupee from students instead they hv paid stipened to them inspite of which they go and lodge a complain in police station of cheating, the case is registered and under IPC 420/ 102 B the 2 director and one relative not connected with business is arrested and 3 days of PC and 3 days of JC they go through without any fault of theirs , meanwhile the HR company 2 partners are absconding but they are A1 & A 2 in the FIR rest a3,a4,a5 are the partners.
now the matter is in court last 4 years and even FOC is not done . My question to the honorable jury.
1) can the case proceed with A1 & A2 absent and no effort by police is done to trace them ?
2) is the ingredients of IPC 420 /102B fulfilled in this case ?
3) wht shd be the stand of a3, a4 and a5 as there is no proof wth the students that they hv given money to the XYZ company.
4) if complainant does not turn up for hearing on summons then how many chances the court gives ?
yr kind guidance will be very much appreciated
Anonymous
15 January 2010 at 12:09
TAMIL NADU forests recently announced in the leading papers that they would like to acquire over 300 acres in nilgiris area under the pretext of wild life protection & elephant corridor to get foreign funds. since area is large there are local inhabitants, hospitality industry and private land owners which are registered by local panchayat and requisite fees have been paid by everyone.
now suddenly TN forests hv come heavily on the hospitality industry and private owners, the matter is in high court of chennai.
i would like to know :
1) how thet can acquire when the panchayats hv registered the land ?
2) can they acquire without compensation ?
3) wht is the correct procedure for acquiring if court passes an order ?
4) wht relief we can get from court ?
5) report of elephant corridor is it absolute and whose report can be considered as locus standi in the court of law ?
6) can they ask the private owners to pack thier bags over night ?
they hv asked affected people to file objections nxt month wht shd be our stand.
PLS HELP SOS
Anonymous
15 January 2010 at 11:42
the applicant is an automotive dealer and company issued credit notes according to sale, which is only income, the applicant deduct the credit notes in trading account from purchase and derive gross profit.the applicant is charcged under 12.5% VAT.the applicant deposit vat to the price of sale.now the sto is asking to deposit the vat @12.5% on amount of credit notes arguing that if the figure of credit notes removed from trading account the firm will come in loss which is true as said earlier in this trade the only frofit is from credit notes . the figures are opening stock - 332214 purchase - 2920201.95 less credit note - 242428, add debit note - 1854 =net purchase in trading account - 2679627.25 sales - 1912953 closing stock - 1189242.27 GP - 90354.02 what to do.
Anonymous
15 January 2010 at 11:32
Dear Experts
My query pertains to a clause in the Distributorship Agreement which reads as follows:
The Company shall not enter into agreement with Sub - Distributor/s on an independant basis during or after termination/ expiration of this Agreement with Distributor.
Please note :
1. Sub- distributors are independant dealers to whom the Distributor sells products purchased from Company.
2. The relation between Company and Distributor is on Principal to Principal basis.
I request answer to my following query:
1. Legallity of such clause in the distributorship Agreement vis a vis Contract Act.
Regards
ravi
15 January 2010 at 11:20
i married on 13.6.2002. i have a male child on 2003. we are separated last on year. my wife reside with her parents. she in only daughter for her family. i sale my property to my sisters husband in feb 2007. My wife filed DV case against me, my mother, my sister and sisters husbend for want of maintenance, give property by cancel sale. Is possible to cancel the sale and got share. i earned monthly 25000 per month approximately what amount share to be given to maintanance.
Anonymous
15 January 2010 at 10:35
Sir, we are the trusty of one Non Granted english School. We were not deducted the epf amount from the salary of our employee. So EPF Commissioner issued a order to pay these dues & also paid the damages 100%.Let me know that, the damages are compulsory or it can be waived by the commissioner? thanks
Prashant Kothari
15 January 2010 at 09:07
Dear Sir,
working as Job Consultant having good banking track record but unfortunately when i started business in 2004 taken one loan from SBBJ bank or due to financial crisis was not able to repay 50,000/- Rs but as my business grows recently before 1 Yr cleared all amount in my loan,But this bank manager is not giving me no dues certificate or NOC.
Please give me suggestion that how i can take action against this bank manager or how i can get my NOC letter.
RGDS
Prshant Kothari
Anonymous
15 January 2010 at 07:57
Hi Sir/Madam I am searching following citation
if there is no prayer of interium relief in the plaint plaintiff is not entitle to get interium relief (exhibit 5 )
please tell me if there is any citation
R KANNAN
15 January 2010 at 06:08
Landed properties of say 100 acres agri land in TN, where only oral partition is reported and no registered deed / no court order is there till date 2010 and as of now belonging to octogenarian 4 brothers in Tamil Nadu ; IN THE EQUAL SHARE scenario of one of the above FOUR getting 25 acres how the same gets inherited to 3 SONs(Married) + 2 Daughters (Married before 1984 in TN State ); Whether father giving PA to one SON only now could take away the due share of married daughters ; If daughter can ask for her share be divided and given to her i.e demand partition
Relaxation of Duty Timing
Employee's duty timing is 9.00 am. in morning. One employee usually come around 9.05 - 9.15 am.
Is there any relaxation given to employee by statut on duty timing ? If any yes plz let me know the section and subsection under law.
Plz reply.