Anonymous
06 March 2010 at 17:01
a married female started living with another man without getting divorce from previous husband and gave birth to a child with second man...now the second man with his minor child(2yrs old) withdrew from the company of this female and she moved rape complaint but didnt get sucess and now she has approached the court through protection officer under dv act....
does she has any capacity to file complaint under dv act ?
she has named the family members of the man in the complaint as well. can they be summonned as respondents which includes females too ??
venkat reddy
06 March 2010 at 16:55
X gave a register GPA Agr.Land to his daughter Y in the year 1990 later inthe year 1999 X passed away in the year 2002 Y sold awy the property to Z through Agreement of sale cum GPA to Z.Now some third parties are disturbing the Z he filed injunction suit this has come to the notice to the son of the X now he want to implead in the suit please help me mail any citations in this context.
Anonymous
06 March 2010 at 16:39
Que.1.Please Explain Difference between Civil Prison and Criminal Prison?
Trinadha Rao
06 March 2010 at 16:19
Que.1.Respondent Petition Copy Served by Court Amin did not have the Petitioner Signature on it, I want to know the Validity of that Petition?
Aruna
06 March 2010 at 15:53
Que.1.Since Ex-Parte Decree literally means the Court Order in the absence of Respondent ,
Que.2.In such a scenario does the Court Order will be communicated to Respondent similarly to Summons or the respondent will be kept in Dark until the Respondent Take Initiative?
shrikant chede
06 March 2010 at 15:29
whethere company can withheld payment of contributory provident fund amount untill finilisation of diciplinary action agaist employee ,who caused moneytory loss to the company
Anonymous
06 March 2010 at 15:27
whethere company whethere company can withheld payment of graduity untill finilisation of diciplinary action agaist employee ,who caused moneytory loss to the company
Anonymous
06 March 2010 at 15:06
Hi,
I left my organisation on Dec, 2009, after serving a notice period of one month as per the company policy. At the time of leaving, despite of my request, nobody took the handover from me.
Then I handed over company’s belongings to my junior and took receiving of the same and sent scanned copy to HR at HO.
As per company policy the F&F gets done within 45 days but the process got initiated after 1.5 months.
Apart from my one month’s salary, company also owed to me the travel expense which i incurred for official purpose. Every time they came up with some or other query and delayed the F&F.
When i requested for full & final then company said that some of the equipment i.e. projector worth Rs. 40K is missing from the office and i will have to pay for them. Whereas at the time of leaving the organisation no such issue was there. Even in Audit, which was done by HO team, no such information brought to my notice while working with the company.
Now they have sent me the F&F sheet and deducting the amount under the head of INCOME TAX deduction and ADVANCE whereas they have been deducting the Income Tax every month and they DO NOT HAVE POLICY OF GIVING ADVANCE FOR EVEN OFFICE EXPENSE.
Moreover, they are not showing the loss of equipment under head of INCOME TAX DEDUCTION RATHER THAN ”Loss to Company”.
Isn’t it unlawful.
It is more than 3 months that Full & final settlement is not done.
Pl. Advise, how to take it forward.
Regards,
R. K
Anonymous
06 March 2010 at 14:31
In the sub-court the court had given the preliminary decree and the petitioner asked for issue of the final decree in this time the sub court can sell the properties of the defendant in the partition suit which are in occupation with the defendant before the completion of final decree
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
statements made while in police custody
while in custody they threatened with direconsequences and even ill treatment of child. so own up everything eventhough it is not under the control of the accused he cannot do anything he is simply a clerk so he has no power to do anything but he was forced to say and own up everythin is it valid in court