LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

vaishali   30 November 2008 at 20:14

can court go behind the decree?

hello, r\sir
my que. is that,can a court executing the decree go behind the decree? any citetion on that point.
thanks!

vaishali   30 November 2008 at 20:11

can court go behind the decree?

hello, r\sir
my que. is that,can a court executing the decree go behind the decree? any citetion on that point.
thanks!

vaishali   30 November 2008 at 20:03

attachment before judgment

hello,sir
i want to ask that, when can a court pass an order of attachment before judgment?
i gone through order38, rule5 but consept is not clera yet.is it a discretionary or mendetory?
thanks!

vaishali   30 November 2008 at 20:02

attachment before judgment

hello,sir
i want to ask that, when can a court pass an order of attachment before judgment?
i gone through order38, rule5 but consept is not clera yet.is it a discretionary or mendetory?
thanks!

shivraj   30 November 2008 at 11:47

Hindu Sucession Act 1956

-Landed property originally owned by Bhau Khot as ancestral property
-Bhau khot executed two lands to his sister (Tanabai Balu Yadav)to his sister for her maintainence till her life time and after her demised the said property should be come to Bhau Khot accordingly registered maintainence deed was executed the contents of the deed are binding upon the heirs. In 1964 Bhau Khot died and Tanabai died in the year 1971.
-Whether the property given in maintaince is became the absolute property of Tanabai after the death of Bhau Khot?
OR
-Whether the property given in maintaince is became ancestral property of Bhau Khot and it should be devolved in the heirs of Bhau Khot and after his demise son namely Dinkar Khot can become the absolute owner or he can possessed property as self acquired or ancestral. What is the correct nature or status of the property after the death of Tanabai in the heirs of Bhau His son Dinkar and his sons and daughters?
-What will be the share of Dinkar’s two sons,wife and two daughters those who r married before 1994?

Zia   30 November 2008 at 11:46

CONTRACT LABOUR REGULATION & ABOLITION ACT, 1970

Please refer to the definition of "Appropriate Government " under CLR&A Act 1970.
Can any of the learned lawyer throw some light regrding who would be the "Appropriate Government" under CLR&A Act for Central Public Sector Undertakings, i.e Central govt. or state govt.References in this regard may be made to the Judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SAIL and HAL cases.
It is pertinent to mention that in the State of Chhattisgarh, CG IR Act is applicable in palce of ID Act.

shivraj   30 November 2008 at 11:18

hindu sucession act 1956

-Landed property originally owned by Bhau Khot.
-Bhau khot executed two lands to his sister (Tanabai Balu Yadav)to his sister for her maintainnce till her life time.
-she died the without any heirs.
As per died the property should come to Bhau Khot.
-Bhau khot died in 1964 and Tanabai 1974.
-Bhau khot has one son Dinakar and two sister who were married before 1964.After that the property sale out by the elder brother mansingh for the reason of By-pass surgery of Father.
-They have right to sell out the property of restraining the right of Jaysingh?
-Son Of Dinkar Jaysingh has filed suit for Partition and claimed 1/4 share.
-Dinkar climed the property of Tanabai as heir of Bhau as full owner and denied the share of Jaysingh in the property of Dinkar as Coparcener.
-Whether the property given in maintainnce become the property of Dinkar on full owner and not partible.
-I have filed suit on behalf of the Jaysingh son of Dinkar for partition against father and brother.
-What will be the share of Jaysingh?

N.K.Assumi   30 November 2008 at 06:37

Definition of Terrorist:

WHO IS A TERRORIST? IS THERE ANY DEFINITION OF TERRORIST UNDER ANY INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS LIKE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OR THE ROME STATUE? WHAT ABOUT THE UNITED NATIONS? HAS IT DEFINED THE MEANING OF TERRORIST?

Ladhu Ram Chowdhary   29 November 2008 at 21:17

sec.91and 397 cr.p.c.

under sec.91 order by magistrate is interlocutory or not!