LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ASHWANI GAGNEJA   26 July 2009 at 16:44

AMENDMENT IN REGN. OF FIRM WITH REG. OF FIRMS

DEAR SIRS

WE HAVE FILED A RECOVERY SUITE AGAINST A PRIVATE LTD. CO. IN DISTRICT COURT. OUR FIRM WAS REGISTERED WITH REGISTRAR OF FIRMS IN MAY 1994. EITHER BY OUR OWN OR BY SUB REGISTRAR'S MISTAKE, THE NAME WAS MENTIONED IN THE REGISTRATION AS AVS INDUSTRIES INSTEAD OF AVS SILVERPLATE. IF, WE GET THE AMENDMENT FROM REGISTRAR'S OFFICE NOW, PLEASE LET US KNOW WHETHER THE AMENDMEND BE EFFECTIVE RETROSPECTIVE OR NOT, AS THE AMENDMENT BE DONE AFTER 15 YEARS

CAN YOU PLEASE ADVISE ME OF ANY RUILING BY ANY HIGH OR SUPREME COURT.

ALSO, PLEASE SUGGEST US A COMETANT LAYWER ON THIS MATTER. LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR EARLY REPLY.

THANKS & BEST REGARDS

ASHWANI GAGNEJA



Deepak R Mahapatra   26 July 2009 at 15:41

LLM from DIstance Education.

Can any one tell me what is the industry recognisation/status for a LLM degree through Distance eduction from Universities like Annamalai, Kaktiya etc.

Vinod Kumar K   26 July 2009 at 15:40

Conversion from Proprietorship to Partnership

Sir, I have proprietorship business having VAT licence, Trade licence etc. for the said business and now due to my financial crisis and to run the business want to invite a partner and forming a partnership business. Please I want guidlines is it possible to transfer VAT licence, Trade licence, etc. relating to my proprietory business to partnership?

Vinod Kumar K   26 July 2009 at 15:33

GRABBING GOVERNMENT LAND

Sir, my neighbour has grabbed some land from the side of municipal road about 1.5 cents and the land situated at 'L'turn road side. It is please note that the road is a narrow and 'L'turn and hence the vehicle from steepy road and turning which regualrly happening of accidents. Please give guidlines to take the said government land as a purbli interest.

suparna   26 July 2009 at 14:46

IPC498 n 306

What is the maximum punishment if proven guilty under these two sections? a college lecturer has been framed under IPC 498 after 15 years of his marriage when his professionally struggling wife with active social connections as a theatre activist has commited suicide leaving a note mentioning mental frustration. his in-laws have have filed a FIR citing dowry related torture mental torture though the husband returned once a week from his long distance workplace and carried out all the domestic responsibities.
Please suggeest where he stands in terms of legal perspective

A Truthseeker   26 July 2009 at 13:10

competitive examinees with addiction

it is scientifically proved that doping gives extra strength to competitors. in sports parlance it disqualifies a competitor sports-person. when two competitors vying for the same post in a competitive examination get prepared one taking intoxicants like liquor , drugs and the other following ordinary life it is natural the latter would lag the former and ultimately lose the competition . so like doping case one with habits of drinking or addiction should be debarred from among equal competitors?

Ziaur Rahman   26 July 2009 at 13:02

Defamation

What is the period of limitation for filing a defamation suit for compensation. Does the time start from the day when the slenderous and defamatory writing was communicated by the accused to the complainants employer or from the date when the complainant came to know about the same writing being intimated by the employer.

Ziaur Rahman   26 July 2009 at 13:00

Defamation

What is the period of limitation for filing a defamation case under section 500 I.P.C. Does the time start from the day when the slenderous and defamatory was communicated by the accused to the complainants employer ar from the date when the complainnat came to know about the same being intimated by the employe.

Ziaur Rahman   26 July 2009 at 12:56

Equality/pay protection

By virtue of the West Bengal Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act 1976,the juniors in the same rank belonging to general category were superseded in grant of promotion by their colleaguer belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes upon their seniors (of general category in gradation list) in feeder post by virtue of a 100 point roster preapred by the State Government. As a result the seniors were not only superseded in ranks but also started receiving less salary in comparison to their juniors who were promoted to the next higher rank .When the general category candidates were promoted to the next higher rank they were considered junior in that rank and were palced at the bottom of the gradation list below their SC/ST counterparts and are being less paid in their salay than their junior scheduled caste and scheduled tribe counterparts who had superseded them under the Act. What is the remedy before the employees of general category. Why the y should be discriminated twice by the ST/SC employees, once in rank and aother in salry and perks.Does not it violate the Constitution on the point of equality.What is remedy against this inequality?

Anamika Dubey   26 July 2009 at 11:23

Solicitor

Hello Lawyers,
I am Advocate Anamika Dubey. I am presently in Pune. I am having 1 year practice experience and i want to join a solicitor as i am highly interestd in that category. But i dont have any idea how to go for it and where to start from? Could you please help me with this and also i need information that can i apply now.