Anonymous
15 February 2014 at 12:05
Respect sir
I m felling very depressed right now plz guide me.
Sir I joined a central goverment job as pharmacist on 22 july 2013 on grade pay of 2400.
Sir before joining I also applied for pharmacist grade 2 with grade pay 2800 during probation and after that 4200.in other goverment organization.
At the time of joing I gave in written that I have applied for the other post too and intimated. In. Written that I may need noc to attend interview if selected.
Sir now they are not giving me noc,saying that u have not applied through proper channel,sir hw could I apply through proper channel,because I was not into job at that time,i applied it before joining current job.now sir the interview is scheduled in few days and and they are threatening me that if u went without permission we will complain at ur interview site after u join there and then u will lose both job.
I prepared for that job a lot and it is in my hometown too.sir plz guide me I have started taking antidepressant pills.plz sir
aakash kumar
15 February 2014 at 11:32
I have two pan card , one pan card is fake what I have to do. How can I surrender pan card? Would u please guide me regarding the same.
Punishment for having a fake pan card.
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
15 February 2014 at 11:28
dear experts,
we are purchased the land in the year 2004 with agreement Of "possessory agreement of sale" which was executed by the land owners which is ancestral propery.we are paid (PART PAYMENT)21 lakhs rupees out of 22 lakhs for sale consideration and we are ready to pay remaining sale consideration one lakhs as they are not accepting the amount.
Q1.can we have any right to file specific performance suit after long time to register the said land in favour of us and receive remaining sale consideration one lakh in the court.
Q2.AFTER LONG TIME WE HAVE ANY RIGHT TO FILE THE SUIT AND ANY LIMITATION PERIOD IS THERE .WE ARE IN THE LIMITATION PERIOD OR NOT?
q3.limitation act ,art 113 is applicable for my case if any limitation citations pls provide sir.
q3.transfer of property act section 53a is useful in this case sir,if any case laws pls provide sir.
thank you sir.
amol
15 February 2014 at 10:33
Sirs
I was a developer my Development agreement was illegally /purportedly terminated by Society and society illegally appointed another developer.
Suit was filed for seeking various decalrations and for specific performance of contract of performance of Development agreement by society with me i.e. Developer
initially when the suit was filed the BMC was not a party to the suit but Mhada was.
inspite of issuing legal notice and objections IOD was issued illegally to new developer by BMC.
A writ was filed in the High court against the BMC and its officers challenging issue of IOD to new developer seeking main prayer therein hearing was not given and cancelling IOD issued to new builder.
But the said writ was withdrawn by previous lawyer by seeking a liberty to file a notice of motion in above suit knowingly that BMC was not made as a party in the suit.
the above all are the facts now the Question is
whether in view of sec sec 19 and 15 of Specific relief act and Judgement in 2008 of A Kabir in Bharat_Karsondas_Thakkar_vs_M-S_Kiran_Construction_Co._&_Or in a suit for specific performance of contract i can make a BMC as party to the suit by moving a chamber summons in view of the liberty sought while withdrawing the aforesaid writ petition
please answer. this is a very vital question ? can BMC and Chief Engineer and Ex Engineer be made as a party now in a suit for specific performance to seek injunction against them and to cancel IOD and CC and PLan ??????
sk..........
15 February 2014 at 08:29
The I.A filed is dismissed in lower court ,can I file appeal in district court or
should I file in high court.
RD
14 February 2014 at 23:31
Kindly opine on the following issue:
A Housing Co-operative Society of Gujarat intends to sell surplus plot of land.
Whether it can do so on its own or does it require permission from District Registrar of Co-operative Societies?
Is there any prescribed procedure for this?
If possible, kindly mention relevant Section or Case Law.
Thanking in Advance
Regards
V.N.K. MENON
14 February 2014 at 23:19
Ld. Experts/ advocates of L/C,
In view of rejection of early hearing application [on account of being senior citizen having sickness and disability] by single bench/ High Court, I approached the Division Bench by way of LPA.
Cogent reasons for early hearing, as submitted in the application, are briefly reproduced below for reference:
------
1. (a) The RESPONDENT-APPLICANT IS A SENIOR CITIZEN [weaker group 62 years of age as at 26 May 2014]. Cases of senior citizens are privileged to early hearing as per the Apex Court directions and also various High Courts including this Hon’ble Court, especially Bombay High Court which reduced the age for entitlement from 65 years to 60 years on 3rd December 2013 in terms: “The Chief Justice and Judges have now directed that precedence be given by courts for hearing and final disposal of the cases wherein one of the parties has attained the age of sixty years and above.
(b) TERMINATION WAS MORE THAN 11 YEARS AGO ON 17.07.2002: AWARD BY LABOUR COURT WAS ON 01.08.2006 and it was challenged by the Petitioner non-applicant by way of a writ petition in garb of appeal in disguise as substantiated in CM No. 10378/12 [on record] and is pending.
2. Respondent-applicant is suffering from sickness and disablement:
(i) Respondent-applicant workman is hard-of-hearing aggravated due to discrimination by the Management as he was not provided with equipments/ uniforms to withstand the severe cold at the place where he was posted situated at 4000ft. altitude near Kullu, Himchal.
(ii) The respondent-appellant workman has breathing problem which was aggravated due to discrimination from other employees at remote place as he was not provided said equipments by petitioner non-applicant, to withstand severe cold at remote place situated at 4000ft. altitude despite several requests [craves leave to produce proof/communications as and when produced] and had to take treatment from a prominent hospital which prescribed costly medicine and inhaler for survival.
(iii) Moreover, the victim was given a forced retirement by the Petitioner non-applicant w.e.f. 26.05.2012 allegedly for attainment of 60 years by discriminating him from contemporaries/colleagues [ref: list attached page -------- of LPA Annx “A2”].
(iv) Respondent-applicant has no livelihood as he was not given bonafide retirement benefits although the statute [Sec-60(1)(g) CPC] precludes authorities from attaching retirement benefits and is beyond attachment by any court of law and finds it difficult to get medical treatment.
(v) Violation of Para 72(5) of EPF Act: To tide over the situation, Respondent-applicant submitted necessary forms to Petitioner non-applicant for withdrawal of p.f. accumulations on 25.11.2003 by Speed post vide No. ED324506157IN. As per Para 72(5) of the EPF Act, an employer is duty bound to forward duly filled in and attested claim application to the respective PF Office within “5 days of its receipt” and is craving to get medical treatment. Further it is reiterated that retirement benefits cannot be attached by any court of law under Sec.60(1)(g) CPC and relying on various Apex Court rulings. The Management violated provisions of EPF Act which was not complied till 17.01.2014 and thus attracted punishment as per law.””””
The D/B gave the liberty to approach Single Bench with the prayer. Accordingly approached Single Bench who rejected the application for early hearing application taking the version of respondent as gospel truth and without giving me opportunity to be heard.
IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WHETHER SLP IN APEX COURT HAS TO BE FILED AGAINST THE ORDER
OR
IS IT OPEN TO APPROACH DIV. BENCH AGAIN WITH THE SAME REQUEST?
THANK YOU .
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
About disowning sons and making born and unborn grandchildren as heirs
I have a question, Please tell me Can I write Vasiyat in which I disown both of my sons and mention that I will not give them a single paisa if they marry against their mother or sister wishes. If they marry to good girl of their mother choice or sister choice in that case too, their daughter or son be owners of my inheritance and can take their decisions from the date when they turn 18 years of age and before that their parents can only supervise the property but can never sell it or transfer it.
Also my question is Can any girl who ever had any illegitimate relations with them, claim rights on my property or any of my assets? I just want my sons to be always careful of the fact that they will not get anything from me if they get into any bad habits. Do you think it possible in court and am I doing right? Please advise.