Prateek Kumar Sharma
25 May 2014 at 22:35
Sir,
I am a respective person of our society.I live in Kishanpur area,there is a characterless woman,who was fighting with her father in law's brother and they both done police complaints and cases on each other.She thinks that i am helping his father in law's brother but this is not true.So she made me her enemy and she had done a false complaint on me in Quarsi Police Station,in that complaint he wrote that in the afternoon time when noone was there in her home then me and a boy living in my nearby house went to her home and we opened her gate and we strictly caught him and we remove her clothes and try to rape her and she shouted but nobody listened her and suddenly her mother in law arrives then we ran from there. Sir this is her complaint but this is false.You know sir our colony's road is always full of peoples so you u can think that in the crowdy area she shouted but nobody listens her,Is this true? sir this is totally false you can ask from my neighbours.Sir my family is scared so much please help us please we need your help.I am a simple person.I lives happily with my family but when my family hears about this case till then they are always crying and they are scared. I want to know is there any chances of not going to jail and solve this case outside. can i get bail before getting arrested?
priyank
25 May 2014 at 22:16
Dear Experts,
I have applied for propriter code for trademark in online mode which i have got it.
Now, due to digital signature problem we are trying to register in offline mode.
can i use the same propriter code of online mode in the offline mode. If yes then ok, If not then how can i get it in offline mode.?
thanks & regards.
RAJESH CHOPRA
25 May 2014 at 19:36
Dear Sir,
I was cheated by a fraudster in June 2012 for few lakhs in admission for my child in a professional course. I filed a police complaint and inspite of my followup no action was taken by them as I didn't have any documentary evidence though I had recorded conversation and a video evidencing giving him money for the purpose.
There is another complaint against the same person and in the same police station which is backed by documentary evidence but police has also not taken any action yet saying that complainant has not approached them after complaint lodgement.
Is it possible in any legal manner to ask or force police to perform their duty in arresting fraudster and file FIR on basis of my complaint or the other complaint even if the complainant has not pursued the compalint.
Isn't it the responsibility of police to catch such fraudsters when 2 complaints are with them.
Pls suggest
Thanks
jagadish paranjape
25 May 2014 at 19:30
The powers of enquiry officers conducting domestic enquiry are not defined.What if the enquiry officer refuses permission to charge sheeted workmen to examine further witnesses on the ground that few witnesses are examined and they are enough.In brief from where enquiry officer derives power to restrict evidence of workman.
regards.
chandan
25 May 2014 at 18:50
sir,
whether a road passing through a coloney can be blocked by putting gates on both the ends of the road. Please also cite citations if available on this issue.
anupam sharma
25 May 2014 at 18:10
An accident occurred between a tractor and truck owing to sole negligence of truck. A state case ensued on basis of FIR got registered by driver of tractor wherein charges have been framed against only owner of truck and trail has begun. An MACT case was filed by family of deceased U/s 163-A of MACT Act which was disposed of by Award of joint and several liability between owners of tractor and truck. AN FAO has been preferred in High Court on these counts:-
1. The MACT decided case considering Sarla Verma judgment which was passed in case U/s 166 Act while the present matter was filed U/s 163-A Act and cut of 50% was done on income of deceased and not cut of 1/3rd as per second schedule.
2. Multiplier was fixed according to Sarla Verma judgement and not second schedule.
3. The age of dependants was also considered in addition to considering age of deceased at the time of death
4. Joint and several liability was fixed on both truck and tractor owners/drivers, while the dependants want to recover only from tractor driver/owner as the truck driver is dead and the owner has no means.
Few facts relating to case are that the tractor being a goods carrier had passengers although it was gratuitous ferrying on insistence of deceased.
The liability of tractor driver/owner has been fixed only on alleged reason of overloaded tractor which is not so in reality as evident from FIR and evidence of Pws themselves.
The family of deceased has been given one lakh from religious place from where the tractor was giving his gratuitous services.
There are many more earning members in family besides deceased.
Now, the question is a) do the above facts help the tractor owner/driver.
b) does not sarla verma judgment apply in cases of 163-A , even as guide?
c) is second schedule applicable strictly to cases under 163-A, without any other considering factors
d) is it prerogative of victims family from whom to recover compensation even if the Tribunal has fixed joint and several liability on both vehicle owners.
kindly help
Saraswati Brahmne
25 May 2014 at 17:50
My father died without making any nomination.But he made holograh will which mention that father wants the flat to transfer in both daughters name and mother name. now mother wants the flat in Mumbai(only property) in her name and does not want to give flat to any child. she wants flat in her own name only. can the children get the share in flat? flat in not ancestral. owned by father. secondly society is not transferring flat to mother's name.
Thanks
saraswati
Narender Bhardwaj
25 May 2014 at 17:19
A person is convicted u/s 323 and 325 IPC and realeased on Probation for a period of 6 months and one year respectively for sec.323,325 of IPC. The Order is annouced on 14-05-2014 by S.D.J.M. Court,Mahendragarh in Haryana. Can he contest the election for the post of Panch or Sarpanch in Haryana in future
Varunhi
25 May 2014 at 17:14
I am staying from last 4 years in a rented accommodation in Ghaziabad and I and my parents do not have a permanent house as we have sold our house 7 years ago. I got a tatkal passport 2 years ago, Now passport office has sent me a notice for adverse police verification that I have mentioned a rented house as a permanent address and they fare frightening me by saying that they will cancel it. But this sounds too illogical as many people will be there who does not own a house. Permanent address is the mandatory item in passport form which I filled as my current address. What is the law or definition of permanent address in India? Please help. I am in urgent need.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
B katha flat - good to buy
Hi,
Is it good to buy B Katha flat ?
In case, I am going to but it what will be the impact, How much panelty I need to pay for Katha conversion ?
Please suggest me...