Binayak Acharya
21 September 2014 at 22:51
Sir ,
As regards my promotion in Government Job , I am not having pending of any departmental proceeding , any charge sheet and having availbility of 5 consecutive effective CCRs for due promotions , 25 Years of experience not yet promoted ,now there is a scheme by which juniors are superseding , because of pending of GR case Juniors superseded me,superseded by three Ranks , now the GR Case against a Police Case is under stay by High Court Cuttack , I am not yet convicted . In stay order the appointment Authority is not a party too.
Shall I get a promotion or it shall be under discreationary power of A IAS officer/DPC.
Thomas
21 September 2014 at 22:44
Thanks for the reply
RAVI SRIVASTAVA
21 September 2014 at 22:24
Company act 2013 u/s 447, where complaint will be lodge.
vandana
21 September 2014 at 22:23
i am doctor working in air force as a SQN LDR.Im going to retire after 10 years of service in PB3 with a grade pay of 6600.Now I have applied for a Gp A Gazetted post through UPSC directly with a payscale in PB3 ,however with a grade pay of 5400.will I get pay protection or I will draw lower Grade pay of 5400. pls advice
RAVI SRIVASTAVA
21 September 2014 at 22:19
I want to know about Indane LPG rules. My client LPG connection de-activated due to not booking LPG last 180 days. As per IOC rules connection has deactivated but without any pre information. Any expert have a case law or rules in this matter.
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA
21 September 2014 at 21:41
16.09.2014
It was in 2008 when some people defamed me issuing a document duly signed that I am party to the defalcation of Rs. 60.00 lacs which took place in Coop. Hsg. Society ion the year 1978 to which I was never involved. Initially I wrote to all the signatories telling that either they should say sorry and seek and apology to me failing which I shall not any other alternative except to file acse against the. Only four persons said sorry and sought an apology in writing to me. There being no other way left with me I had filed a defamation suit u/s 500 of IPC against them in the lower court. On the first day of hearing when the Petitioner as well as all the Defends were present the Hon'ble Judge after going through my petition and hearing from the both the parties i.e. the complainant (herein me) and also the respondents (other side) found that there are sufficient ground to admit the complaint of mine. He found the responds to be guilty and accordingly released all the accused (respondents) against security and surety bond both.
Since then the hearing of the case was continued. Since inception of the case, I never had been absent in the court and given my attendance continuously. The cross examination of mine (complainant) by the advocate of defendants (respondents) was in progress and not completed too. In between two more persons wrote to me seeking apology and requesting to make them free the case. All these papers, in original have been surrendered to the Ld. Judge and have also been recorded in the proceedings.
However, it was only during the end of July, 2014, on the scheduled date of hearing, I could not appear before the Ld. Judge (from this date a new judge took the chair) since suddenly became ill due to fall in Sugar level. Here I need to mention that my wife's is a chronic patient of Diabetes including allied illness and was also hospitalized for 15 days in April, 2014. She has been undergoing treatment of a leading Diabetologist since last two decades.
Accordingly my advocate appealed and submitted an application before the Ld. Judge. In the application it was prayed to give a date sometimes in September as from July end to August middle I was also to visit ailing brother who is critically ill and stays abroad. It was not possible for me to change the dates of my visit since my Visa and Ticketing was completely ready. Without going into the merit of the case the judge fixed the next date of hearing as August 2nd, 2014 when I was out of the country.
ON August 2nd, 2014 the Ld. Judge dismissed the case u/S 200 & 256 of CrPC and now the respondents or defendants are mongering rumours that I have lost the case, which is untrue.
Here the followings need to be mentioned that:-
a. The defendants can not prove that I was ever involved in the defalcation of RS. 60.00 lacs sinc eI was never ever involved in the same.
b. In support of their defense and further to accuse me they have to produce documentary evidence.
My question to the legal brotherhood that is that:-
a. Whether the Ld. Judge can dismiss the petition without hearing me and without giving me an opportunity of the Principle of the Natural Justice?
b. If, I could not attend the hearing twice i.e. during end July and August 2nd, 2014 what crime did I commit that the case had to be dismissed whereas my hearing has remained incomplete and further the respondents have not heard at all.
C. what should be next course of action?
I shall be grateful for a kind reply/deliberation from Ld. advocates.
Sriprakash Bhattacharya
bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com
bhattacharyasriprakash@in.com
raj devendran
21 September 2014 at 21:39
sir,
pls provide me with details on age limit to join a law college prefereably in tn, andhra & karnataka. my dob is 10/12/1971. i am interested to study law and thereafter practice it.
rgds
raj devendran
Member (Account Deleted)
21 September 2014 at 16:50
Mother=M
Son=A,B,C
In 1981,Mother was having a house in her name which was built with equal contribution from "M"+"A"+"B" total Rs.120000
In 1990 house was further developed with first floor by cost of Rs.75000 by "B"
Since 1990 "M" lives with "B" on first floor.
In 2000 ground floor was developed by "A" with Rs.350000
In 2005 First Floor was developed by "B" with Rs.350000
"C" living separtly
On Death of M in 2012 (no will or deed),
"C" claiming his right in full property value as 1/3
Considering the property was maintained and developed by A and B, I feel it injustice to go for 1/3 share to A,B and C.
So what should be my advise as to make it fair deal for all three A,B and C.
About me- I am CA, just started practice, and one relative came up with the said case on hand, asked me to advise for.
Being on neutral on all sides I want to suggest them to prevent their family bonding later on also.
498A-filed
21 September 2014 at 16:36
Hi,
Court has issued Bailable arrest warrants for my 498 A wife in a non bailable case of cheating and cheque bounce. Since she is working, & I have given her office address in the complaint petition, she will probably be arrested in next few days from her office and will be released on bail at the PS itself after furnishing surety as per BW conditions.
I am planning to oppose her AB efforts. I want experts to guide me whether a person who is arrested and released on bail is eligible for AB. Can I oppose her bail on this single technical ground or I should prepare other grounds also. Should I approach the PP with all the documentary evidence against her so that he could oppose her bail effectively.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding appeal in high court
if a person died due to medical negligence and his legal representative want to appeal in high court. what is the procedure for it.