jayanttelang
14 December 2008 at 22:48
Dear sir,i could not find the details about following case law on www.judis.nic.in
kindly help me, which high courts/district courts have been decided these case laws or send me details about these case law-
1.Shantanu v Hindustan Antibiotics 2000(3)CLR 881
2.Dolphin Laboratories v Labour Court n2001(2)LLJ 559
3.Lupin Ltd v Suresh 2007(4)KLT 1092
please help me as early as possible.
Dulhani L C
14 December 2008 at 21:51
Dear Sir,
One of my client was married almost 25 years back.
At the time of his marriage he was around 20 years old and his wife was around 17 yeas old.
This marriage was an arranged marriage.
My client was under the pressure of their parents so he surrenderd himself to satisfy his parents and got married.
Later on as time passed my cliet came to know that his wife was not mentally normal.
It was also certified by a private mental doctor that his wife was abnormal.
My client still continued to live with his wife under the pressure of parents.
At present he has one child around 9 yeas old.
My clinet is totally unhappy with his marriage life.
He wishes to know how whether his marriage conducted at that time was viod ab initio.He wishes to marry a mormal woman.Is it possible for him?
What is the perfect way?
Kindly advise with some citations of courts.
Thanking You,
Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A
14 December 2008 at 20:43
hi
i am headmaster of of a govt. aided school, a third person, who dont have any link with school is seeking audit repors, constituion, salary ragistras and other attendance registers etc. of school under rti act, and copy of constitution, how can i avoid him. i mean we dont want to give him this information.
Senthil
14 December 2008 at 19:45
Hello,
I am currently an employeed, but planning to start my own business.
I am having an idea to start a hotel type of business (Chat shop). Can you tell me if there are any rules applicable to this.
Is Registration necessary for this?
What are the different documents required to start up such business?
If I have to get the details in person where in chennai should I go and get these informations?
rv
14 December 2008 at 18:41
Dear experts,
Father F threw his self acquired house H into HUF in 1978 and showed rental income as HUF income in all tax returns till 2005/6 while the property H continued in his individual name. In August 2004, under pressure from sons S1 and S2, F also gifted the same house H to his sons stating that he was absolute owner of the gifted property H without mentioning HUF. In 2007, daughters D1 and D2 filed a suit for partition of the house H in HC of delhi. As evidence a copy of F's 2005/6 tax return in his capacity as Karta was submitted. The return clearly shows first floor of house H as self occupied and rent from G/F as income. Question 1: Was the gift by F in 2004 valid? 2. Was the property H belonged to HUF as of cut off date for HSA amensment 2005? 3. Do daughters have a good case and what kind of advocate they need ?
RV
Sunny Honey
14 December 2008 at 18:27
Hi everyone,
Can anybody guide me regarding books. Which are the best books on the subject of EVIDENCE, INTERPRETATION OF STATUES, at student level (LL.B) Examination. - URGENT REPLY NEEDED ?
Prashant Kumar Jha
14 December 2008 at 17:54
i want to know that in a copper ingot manufacturing plant LDO as fuel is used for smelting the copper scrap, whether the entries of LDO as fuel is necessary in form IV register and whether its stock and consumed statment should be given in ER6 alongwith monthly return to excise deptt. Please let me know
J K Agrawal
14 December 2008 at 10:29
My question is 'Should an advocate not represent on behalf of Kasab ?"
"Advocate Dinesh Mota who was asked by the Maharashtra legal aid to take up Kasab's case has refused to do so. Speaking to the media persons he said, “I was asked to take up Kasab’s case by the Maharashtra legal aid. But I refused to do so,” he said.
Mumbai attack accused, Mohammedd Ajmal Kasab has been in police custody since November 27. Ajmal was arrested from Girgaum Chowpatty while his associate Ismail Khan was killed in a police encounter on the fateful night of 26/11 attacks.
Ajmal and Ismail had killed 55 commuters at CST and three senior police officers, including Maharashtra ATS Chief Hemant Karkare.
Ajmal has been charged with murder, attempt to murder and conspiracy. Ajmal is being tried in 12 cases in the Mumbai terror attacks."
Kamlesh soni
14 December 2008 at 02:48
Sir, can a man can practice as an advocate if he can do the goldsmith work now? he can handle the gold show room now?the showroom is not his property.the show room's owner is his wife and she give the power of aterny to his husband to handle the showroom?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Negotiable Instruments Act 138
Dear All,
The facts of the case are as under. I am for the accused. The accused and the complainants are family friends for over 3 decades. The complainant had sold a property to the accused and executed a registered sale deed. As a part of the sale consideration the accused has issued a Cheque for Rs 65000/- and mentioned clearly in the sale deed. The accused maintained sufficient balance into his bank account as on the date of issue of the Cheque. Immediately the next day after the sale transaction the accused went to the property and found that there are third party claimants on this property and well as that of Governments claim on this property and civil litigations were there much before the sale transaction took place. The District Collector, Thasildhar and other Government Officials have imposed ban on the sale of this property much before the sale transaction took place. But the complainant purchased the property with different survey numbers and after coming to know the problems he has cleverly sold the property to the accused who is his friend. By then the accused has paid huge amount to the complainant except the mentioned Cheque amount. The accused has informed not to present the Cheque. The complainant has assured to solve the problems and has done nothing and presented the for collection as the time of the Cheque was getting lapsed at the end of 6 months. The Cheque bounced. Cheque bounce case and a civil case for cancellation of the sale deed was filed by the complainant.. After some time the Complainant got amended the civil case for recovery of the balance sale consideration in the event of the sale deed cannot be cancelled. The Civil case was won by us and pending at the High Court
The Accused got the land survey done by the Thasildar office to prove that the survey numbers mentioned are wrong and also procured more than 30 documents to prove the land has several claims and Govt. Claims. The Concerned Deputy Collector was summoned to the court by the accused and he has clearly stated in his chief and Cross examination that the property belongs to the Government.
The complainant has filed only a certified copy of the Cheque in the Criminal Court.
I request members to provide and useful information and High court or S.C. judgments favorable to the accused.
Thank you