Jaydeep Kurup
13 June 2009 at 11:37
Dear All,
Can anyone urgently help me with the latest Minimum Wage notification for Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhrapradesh. Its really urgent.
Thankyou.
Adv. Deepak
13 June 2009 at 11:10
Dear Experts, I want to know how a conversation recorded on mobile can be produced as evidence in Domestic Violence Case in Criminal Court. Whether the mobile service providers give the recorded versions of conversation with authentic certificate? How it can be obtained, if it is possible? What is the procedure for obtaining such records from the service providers? Kindly educate me in this matter. My email is ddkharpudikar@indiatimes.com. Regards. Deepak.
Legal Fighter
13 June 2009 at 10:29
I need a copy of the below judgment at the earliest. Can anyone pls help me getting a copy of the same. I am also ready to pay the required charges incurred in getting the same.
Shipra Raj Ray versus State of West Bengal.
It has been reported in Calcutta Criminal law reporter, 2007, Vol - 1, page no. 800.
Legal Fighter
13 June 2009 at 10:15
I urgently need a certified copy of judgment in respect to the below news in "The Hindu" dated 16.05.2009. Can anybody help me getting the certified copy of the same. I am ready to pay the charges incurred for the same. Pls help me.
Victim cannot seek remedy under two different enactments for same cause: HC
Mohamed Imranullah S.
As a police complaint had already been filed, cognisance cannot be taken under Domestic Violence Act
MADURAI: Judicial Magistrates cannot take cognisance of a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 if the victim had already lodged a complaint with the police under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Madras High Court has ruled.
Disposing of a petition filed in the Madurai Bench by a family from Dindigul, Justice V. Periya Karuppiah held that a victim could not seek remedy under two different enactments for the same cause of action as it would amount to double jeopardy which was prohibited under the Constitutional law.
The Judge also said that a woman could not demand action, under the Act, against her in-laws for writing a letter to her husband’s office seeking his employment details. He agreed with petitioners’ counsel N. Veera Kathiravan that the complainant would not be in anyway aggrieved by such a letter.
An aged woman, her daughter and son-in-law had filed the present petition seeking to quash an order passed by the Dindigul Judicial Magistrate-II who took cognisance of a complaint lodged by the former’s daughter-in-law alleging that the petitioners assaulted her and also wrote letters to her office and that of her husband.
“Apply mind”
Stating that the mother-in-law alone could be prosecuted for writing a letter to her daughter-in-law’s office, Mr. Justice Karuppiah said: “When a complaint is filed under the Act, the lower court must apply its mind and ensure if the allegations attract provisions of the special enactment. But in this case, it has been taken on file abruptly.”
The Judge quashed the case with respect to the victim’s sister-in-law and brother-in-law on the ground that there was no evidence to prove that they assisted in writing the letter.
In so far as the allegation of assault was concerned, a complaint was pending with the police and hence the victim could not invoke the 2005 Act, he said.
venkat reddy
13 June 2009 at 08:10
In mortgage by condition sale will morgagee had right to sell the property after expiry of the due date.please let me know.
Gopal Krishna Behera
13 June 2009 at 07:30
When and how can a decree be executed against a legal representative?
venkat reddy
13 June 2009 at 07:25
A has tenancy rights over some lands according to AP tenancy acts and he is fighting for his rights at various courts in the mean time he passed away leaving behind his sons and daughters as legal heirs. recently daughters came to know that their brothers misreprasented them selves and falsely given a AFFIDAVIT before MRO that they are relenquishing their right over the property now how will daughters approach for their rightful share.
vinod bansal
12 June 2009 at 21:45
R/Members
Kindly clear me difference in between solicitor general / Attorney general of India.With Thanks
Ravinder Sood
12 June 2009 at 21:14
Accounts are being maintained in 'tally'. Computer operator who feeded the data/made entiries has left the job.I had filed a suit for realisation of certain amount on the basis of goods sold on several times and amount received also at several times. In other words, of the difference of the two.I am told that computerised statements are admissible under sec. 65 B of Evidence Act but certain ingredients as mentioned in the section are to be proved before making the print out to be admissible.Pl. send me the details (certificate/affidavit)to be given alongwith the computerised account statement. In my case by whome it will be given.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Service Agreement
Could any tell me what is stated in labour law about service agreements.
Usually with regard to notice periods the appointment orders say " compensation from either side".
But in service agreement , generally the clause is about compensation from employee side only.So there is a opinion these service agreements will not stand valid in the courts as labour law says " an employee cant be foreced to work "
What is your opinion ?