Anonymous
06 January 2010 at 10:16
Dear Experts,
MR X had joined a rival group of company after getting an offer letter from the rival gruop.The previous employer threatned through his HR head that if he joins the rival company they will defame him, harrass him and register a police complain.Mr X has got this threatining call recorded in his cell phone. Mr X aslo gave a writtn complain to the Police Comm stating that he would be framed by the big people as addmitted in the tape. No action or inquiry made on this. Later the previous employer registered a false complain u/s 420, 467, 468 ,114 112- b etc. because of his contacts. Mr X failed to quash and get A/B from high court. Mr X has to remain out of sight due to this.The complainent has not given any proofs of the IPC's stated to the police, but his intention was to harras MR X and not allow him to continue the new Job.MR X has all relevant documents to prove his innocence, but his apprenhension is that ,police may not take everything on records because they might be questioned later on for registering a false complain. Of course the police is not harassing the accused or his family but how can he put an end to this mis fortune? Going to jail and getting a regular bail is the only remedy? The IPC registered are grave but with no proofs,because this was to only harrass Mr X. and keep him away from the new job.
Urgent guidance needed.
queryking
06 January 2010 at 10:06
in a complaint under secti0n 138 of NI Act, the accused has not given any explanation in 313 statement, when the case was posted for argument accused filed application under S.311 to examine a witness who witnessed handing over of the money(cheque amount) to the complainant, court rejected the application giving the reason that accused has not stated this in 313 statement, what is the significance of 313 in cheque cases? is the court rightly dismissed the application?
sinuvasu
06 January 2010 at 02:24
whether the PIL is maintainable in case where the Govt.officers and employees were persuing L.LB courses without the permission from their respective employers.The concerned colleges and the university failed to furnish the copy of permission seeked under R.T.I.Whereas the G.M of that organisation refused to initiate any action against them for misuse of public exchequer and rather suggested to complain to the appropriate authorities to initiate action against them.All those employees and officers of Govt.dept.had fuul time attendence in their office record and simultainously as well as in their law colleges.This clearly shows the mis use of public exchequer and also hurts the sentiments of all the young and senior Advocates.This also violates the norms and standards set up by B.C.I and U.G.C.
Anonymous
06 January 2010 at 00:13
there is central govt employee. he is legally married person. during his marriage is in existence, he started living with another woman ignoring first wife. now querry is whether any central govt employee is allowed to be bigamy and in case if he is found to be so then what are penal actions as per their service rules. What legal actions can be taken against him to force his employer to suspend his job
Anonymous
05 January 2010 at 23:40
Sir
My issue is very sensitive and also regarding ethical values,normally we treat the Doctors and advocates are our wellwishers and we believe them deeply.
I am an employee and have given Rs 4 Lakhs loan to A on original property document and promissory note and as he became defaulter I approached to an advocate and issued a lawyers notice and which is returned as not claimed so I handed over the Original document and promissory note to that advocate for filing a case in the court. Since Nov 15th the advocate is postphoning the filing of the case by telling that praparing of papers for DAVA and Strike in AP and so on at last I came to know that the other side party A has been approached him and given One lakh and taken away the original document and sold away the property in the last week of Dec-09 but even now our Advocate is telling that after completion of pongal holidays he is going to file the case so as to keep me in the dark. That other side party A is not having any property or income to clear my debt.One person told that our Advocate cheated previously one of his client in this manner and that client didnot have any evidence to prove this type of cheating. So I am also didnot have any evidence that I have given the Documents. So I humbly request to kindly suggest me what I have to do and how to solve this issue.
Ranjeet Singh chauhan
05 January 2010 at 23:25
I read in this club itself about charging someone woth DEFAMENT (IPC499,500).
Suppose I got defamed by some police department officer (slap me) and I can't afford a lawyer so how can I file case against that officer without lawyer (as I can't afford)
Ranjeet Singh chauhan
05 January 2010 at 23:19
HI,
I have witnessed through media that xyz person has been imposed with IPC section 123,456,789.
Now in the very first hearing does judge cross check imposition of section against any person which are mentioned in the charsheet/FIR.
for example police has imposed section 302 of IPC where member of culprit know that he should be file under 307.
Police officer was asking for bribe to impose minor setion on person where guilty person has done something which is severe and should be imposed severa sectin in place of minor section.
I tried my best to xpress my query and hope will get positive comments as always.
Ranjeet
President (Social Empowerment & Welfare Association) NGO
Sumir
05 January 2010 at 23:11
Can I go voluntarily, to a Govt. Hospital (without my parents/guardian/informant/ since I am 22 years old) for mental evaluation/assessment/examination/check-up/test/diagnosis, to get mental fitness certificate, since there are allegations that I am not in corpus mentis/mentally unfit/ill/unsound/insane, from my college and police.
If they reject me, can they be sued in consumer court. Please help
Anonymous
05 January 2010 at 23:06
sir,
i told to forget that boy&girl got married(court marriege)and there girl's parent not complent officiealy in police,
can a police still harress especialy my brother who has nothing to do in all this mattter [by asking about my father's fone nomber]
the same person who set the earlier qoery
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950
Happy New Year to Everyone.
Could anyone please furnish the details of the notification no and date relating to the amendment of Section 66 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950?
As far I am aware the amendment was in the month of May 2009. I am not very sure on this
Please advise.
Thanks in advance