Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Bishwajit   04 May 2010 at 17:27

procedure to cancel fir

What is procedure to cancel fir?

Anonymous   04 May 2010 at 17:06

cheques bounced

I booked few plots in different projects (Haryana/Rajasthan) of a builder and paid a part of the price as advance.

None of the project/plot was delivered. In some cases, the land was not sanctioned and hence builder could not delive the plots.

After much discussions, builder issued the cheques but they bounced. This happened about a year ago.

Since then I have been trying to get new cheques, basiccaly my money, but builder has not given anything yet.

* Can I still file complaint/case against the builder in consumer and/or criminal court against cheque bounce (that happened about a year ago)?

* Can I combine all plots/projects in the same court case? Builder is the same in all cases.

* Should I file the case in Consumer court or Criminal court or both? According to my understanding, consumer court is faster than criminal court but builder may feel less pressure in a consumer court, and there may be no arrest in the consumer court case.

V K SINGHAL   04 May 2010 at 16:10

Supreme Court Order (Section 68 of I Tax Act)

I need complete details of Supreme Court Order in the case of CIT v Lovely Exports (P) Ltd regarding section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This case is to be quoted before CIT(A).

Anonymous   04 May 2010 at 16:07

marriage in arya samaj mandir

hello to all experts
sir i got married in arya samaj mandir in 1.12.2009 in palsora village of punjab. after my marriage me and my wife live separte in our homes in between their is no physical relation between us. after that when i told about this marriage to our parents they said to me we adopt the right process of marriage than they make a ring ceramony on 14.3.2010 after that at the time our kundli did not match and my family refuse to marriage. than girl family logged a complaint aginst my family they demand for a car and one lac cash in woemen cell ludhiana. Please suggest and help me and my family we are in deep trouble. Please Help

Girish Kumar Ojha   04 May 2010 at 15:37

u/s 256cr.p c of138 n i act

Travel Agent association vrs. eastman Travel & anr.

Anonymous   04 May 2010 at 15:36

Present 138 Com before cause of action

138 Compliant present court before cause of action arise ( that after given notice file in 10 days ) .
on present compliant court given next date for 200 crpc Evidence and cognizance after Three month.

On given cognizance’s court made objection for on the point of pre present before cause of action ( compliant present after 10 days form Notice Date).

Now court given next date for cognizance argument.

Please advise me Higher court on point of that “ court may given cognizance after cause of action and pre machour present desion on merit. “

Girish Kumar Ojha   04 May 2010 at 15:34

u/s 256cr.p c of138 n i act

B.Lakshmaiah Vs Veeramalli Nagesh & Anr

Ninu Kapoor   04 May 2010 at 14:36

Property on Lease

Dear Experts,

Need your advice.

Can we rent out or can we sell the commercial property given to us by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC)on lease of 99 years? If Yes, What is the process.

Ninu Kapoor   04 May 2010 at 14:18

Can indemnity bond be challenged

Dear Experts,

Need your advice.

Can we challenge the indemnity bond in the court given by us to someone which is only noterise and not registered?
As i have given one indemnity bond to my uncle to avoid a certain situation.
Now i want court to decide what is right and what is wrong.

Anonymous   04 May 2010 at 13:23

Restricted Arbitration by Railway

Arbitral Award in a matter of unpaid dues for supply (2005) to Zonal Railway, referred to Railway's own appointed (2008)Sole Arbitrator at Jaipur, is now said to have been finalised (April 2010) after hearings during 2009 and the demanded costs have been paid without knowing the outcome of such restricted Arbitration;
What steps would be required after receiving the Award (in favour or against the victim-complainant?