Anonymous
09 May 2010 at 08:21
Plaintiff has filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 10 lacs from the defendant for taking monvey for issuance of foreign exchange to the bank.
The said matter was last two years recently filed an application U/s 38 Rule 1 &2 and Order 39 Rule 5 for attachment of another property is it possible or not.
giriraj ranga
09 May 2010 at 08:05
i do second appeal in raj. hc against lower court judgement. plz tell me procedure of appeal before judgement.
Anonymous
09 May 2010 at 08:04
Ii is order 38 rule 1 &2 & Order 39 Rule 5 was filed in a suit for recovery or not
giriraj ranga
09 May 2010 at 07:55
i do second appeal in hc. notice serving complete and then now next stage.
Seshagiri Viswanatha Rao
09 May 2010 at 07:35
Sirs
Number of Public notices are being published in the News Papers thereby inviting claims and objections prior to completion of land registrations sale with supporting documents for consideration by stipulating time limit.
Kindly indicate such publications are mandatory prior to finalisation registration process, its merits and demerits and in case objections are received is it necessary to furnish to the Sub Registrars concerned. Is such publication of notices in news dailies are also necessary in case of Gift Settlement Deed registration and if so to kindly indicate relevant act/clauses/rules
S V Rao
Hyderabad
Anonymous
08 May 2010 at 23:55
In a case where the bank decree by DRT has been quashed/set-aside by higher forum,the bank has proceeded under securitisation act.Now when the dues of the bank are yet to be adjudicated,how can the bank move in another act showing illegal dues?Bank says they can move as per supreme court order in some case.I feel the apex court could not have passed a law for banks to achieve something indirectly when the bank has failed to do something directly on the face of law.
Can this be explained?
Anonymous
08 May 2010 at 23:54
My father had rented a house in a chal in Mumbai in 1950.
He was leaving there with his wife and a younger brother.
Later my father got a new job in 1955 and moved to a new place which was given to him by his new employer.
Since then my uncle (father's younger brother) has been staying there in the chal and paying the rent. The rent receipt still shows my father's name, but all the receipts are with my uncle, for all the years till today.
My father expired in 1980 and my mother also died after that.
Today, my uncle is having his own house in Mumbai, but still he is not vacating my father's rented house.
What should I do in this case ? Pls advice.
Thanks a lot EXPERTS.
Anonymous
08 May 2010 at 23:45
no time given for imrovement,
no adverse letter issued in the year of adverse entries,
served for 11 years on same job,10 are very good reports from various officers except one biased report,
enquiry also held without natural justice,biased report given by IO,
memorial/appeal filed H.E.POI,no reply received even after reminders in 3 years,
promotion not given to SAG level,
want to fight in court,advise
Anonymous
08 May 2010 at 23:42
no time given for imrovement,
no adverse letter issued in the year of adverse entries,
served for 11 years on same job,10 are very good reports from various officers except one biased report,
enquiry also held without natural justice,biased report given by IO,
memorial/appeal filed H.E.POI,no reply received even after reminders in 3 years,
promotion not given to SAG level,
want to fight in court,advise
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
RIGHT TO CROSS EXAMINE
Whether defence has right to cross examine the witness which is declared hostile by prosecution?
1- If not under which provision? Whether mere declaring him hostile, defence looses it's right. He may be or not fully hostile and if not cross exmined may cause harm to defence, specially in context of apex court's judgments, that evidence of hostile witness can not be washed out fully.
2- If yes under which provision?