Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 18:43
CAN ANYONE GUIDE ME HOW TO PREPARE FOR THE
GOVT LABOUR OFFICER EXAM.ANY BOOK WHICH I CAN PREFER & FROM WHERE IT WILL BE AVAILABLE
Mohd Musabbir Ansari
26 May 2010 at 18:33
Dear All
I need your respectful and expert opinion on the query mentioned below:
That both the parties has got decree of mutual divorce from the competent court of law and it has been settled between the parties that wife will not claim any future allowance or any kind of maitenance and child who is aged about 5 years will remain in the custody of the wife and husband has no relation or contact with the child in the future.
Now the position is that wife has filed a case against her husband on behalf of the child demanding maitenance under section 125 of CrPC.
I would like to know whether child is entitled to claim maintenace though mutual decree of divorce is silent about the maitenance of child but having the provision that all claims has been settled.
If not please cite some case law of High Courts $ Supreme Court.
Kindly treat it as urgent I already facing lot of problems mentally, emotionally, physically as i have been paid money to slove this case in advance.
Eagerly waiting for your reply.
Thanks in advance
Mohd Musabbir Ansari
Advocate
harikrishnan
26 May 2010 at 18:15
dear sir
i am harikrishnan
After i filed suit in court my wife give her response suit in the courtin hearing respondent not completly attend the hearing 5 times the cross question also not asked by respondent advocate. what will be solution for this problem should i give evidence from which is it possible favourable judgement. pls explain
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 18:09
Dear Sir,
I ame staying in joint family including my mother & brother. We both
are sataying in pune for job purpose. My mother is widow she is
staying with my grandemother & my uncles.
My uncles are abussing & harrashing her. We have good lands & property
at our village & ttey wants to capture that.
Request to help.
Perumal Prabhu
26 May 2010 at 17:43
Dear Sir/Mam
one contract was terminated by our administration on risk an cost for an amount of Rs 4,oo,oo,ooo/-. We proposed to recover the risk an cost from the failed contractor from other ongoing contracts on which we have lien under agreement. meanwhile the contractor filed application U/s 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and got interim stay against the recovery. on final disposal of the application the civil judge has allowed the application in part. the Hon'ble Judge set quashed our recovery notice but ordered the contractor to submit surity of immovable property worth Rs 4 crores till the disposal of Arbitral Proceedings.
The contractor went on appeal before the High Court U/s 37 of A & C Act 1996 and got modified the order passed by the trial court. the condition imposed by the trial court to produce surety was set-aside. the reason given by the Hon'ble High Court is that our administration is not having authority to determine the amount. the arbitral tribunal is the authority to determine the amount. If the risk and cost amount is not recovered from the contractor at this stage then it will be difficult to recover the same once his other projects are completed.
In this regard can any one give me any case law to challenge the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court?
Ajai Kumar Roy
26 May 2010 at 17:42
We have required a standared draft of Superdarinama. After lodge a FIR Vechicle stand in concerned thana.S.H.O
Baskaran Kanakasabai
26 May 2010 at 17:01
I hereby request all experts in lawyersclub india to examine the presentation titled "The Flaw in the Law" posted in the forum section in 9 parts and let me know as to whether the flaw referred to in the presentation is indeed a flaw or not and as to how to proceed further if anyone concurs with the view that the flaw is a flaw indeed.
Sincerely,
Baskaran Kanakasabai
Anonymous
26 May 2010 at 16:58
good evening elders, i want to know present rule or procedure to get notary licence
Sandeep Chadha
26 May 2010 at 16:57
I had given goods to accused no. 2 who is the proprietor of a firm. Accused no. 1 issued a personal cheque to discharge the payment. Are both accused liable under section 138 ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
bail
hi friends gd evening,
whether the 52A r/w 68A of copy right act is bailable or nonbailable. Is there any citations to move the bail as bailable sec.?