LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   28 July 2010 at 09:00

RTI

I WANT TO FILE THE RTI CONCERNING COMMON WEALTH GAMES.SO, TELL ME WHERE SHOULD I FILE RTI AND IN WHICH DEPARTMENT.

barun deka   28 July 2010 at 08:57

partition

how much is the weightage of a mutual partition among the family members of the family property??? any decisions

Anonymous   28 July 2010 at 08:49

Salary Cheaque Bounced

Hi

I was working with a consultancy and left it on 26th April,2010. My employer provided my salaried cheaque for april month with date mentioned as 9th June,2010.
But he asked me to deposit same on 8th July,2010 as he was having shortage to funds. I deposited my cheaque on 8th July but it got bounced and he is not providing my salary
Kindly guide me what action I can take against him.

Anonymous   28 July 2010 at 08:11

Judgement Copies of Highest amount granted u/s 125 Cr.P.C?

Request the Experts to provide past Judgement Copies if any of any Courts which granted Highest monthly amount u/s 125 Cr.P.C?

Anonymous   28 July 2010 at 07:23

Probation of Offenders Act

Can a driver of a transport corporation can be acquitted under PO Act as the offence of crime 304 A is only first time and no direct eye witness

Patanjali Narayan Dixit   28 July 2010 at 02:25

Right To Thanrsfer an Immoval Property

The person RAM was the legal owner of a plot of land having the documents registered in his name. After his death this son BALRAM has inherited the aforesaid property.

Balram has 3 sons - MOHAN, SOHAN and ROHAN. Now Balram has devided the property among his three sons but the partition has been done orally and not by executing any instrument in his sons' favour. BALRAM is still alive.

The issue is that MOHAN has sold some part of the land (which was given to him by his father orally) to MAHESH and his father has signed as a witness in the sale deed.

Further, SOHAN is also trying to sell some part of the land (which has fallen in his part) to RAMESH in the same way as Mohan did.

Now I have following questions:
1). Whether the oral pertition amounts to acquisition of title of ownership by the sons of BALRAM without any documents registered in their name regarding the title of ownership after partition of the property?

2). Is the mehtod by which MOHAN has sold his part of the land (by making his father as witness to the contract) to MAHESH is legally valid?

3). If the answer to question 2 is "No" then please suggest the actions RAMESH may ask SOHAN to perform before he transfers the property to RAMESH so that the transfer to RAMESH is legally valid without any potential legal obstacles which may arise if the transfer is done in the way as MOHAN did.

Wating for for valuable inputs/solutions/suggestions.

Thanks and Regards,
Patanjali

venkataraman   28 July 2010 at 00:07

the indian arms act

In a given case the Court has found an accused guilty for an offence under section 27 (3 ) of the Indian Arms Act, and the punishment prescribed for the same is only death: But can the Court on a consideration that the case is not a rarest of the rarest case award a lesser punishment?. I am not going into the niceties of the case and I amn only restricting my query to the above.

venkataraman   28 July 2010 at 00:06

the indian arms act

In a given case the Court has found an accused guilty for an offence under section 27 (34 ) of the Indian Arms Act, and the punishment prescribed for the same is only death: But can the Court on a consideration that the case is not a rarest of the rarest case award a lesser punishment?. I am not going into the niceties of the case and I amn only restricting my query to the above.

Anonymous   27 July 2010 at 23:31

Pro note

When a person gives a pro note for Rs.100,000 and attest his signature every three years and at the back of the note by signing that Rs.1000 has been given. Once this person expires and the holder of the pro note appraoch the court directly without intimtaing the legal heirs and attaches the property of the deceased. what to suggest to the legal heirs about the case proceedings. The petitoner had approached the court after two years from the death of the person who had signed the pronote

Anonymous   27 July 2010 at 23:01

Un born person?

under what circumstances, will bequeathed in favour of unborn person is not valid?