Anonymous
12 August 2019 at 10:48
I sent a legal notice to another lawer who cheated me sending a fake HC order which is duly confirmed . One year lapsed. Fees paid already (I avoid to tell how much in detail). Since he begged n promissed to conduct my case without further expenses in lower court I keep calm. But no progress still. He refuses to attend my phone call last four months. In his reply he denied many of my questions raised.After I have given much time to him I conclude he is fraud. Now my question is that can I proceed for further action on him based on his activities n correspondence? Is there limitation period as per law. I req to don't avoid to answer since he is also wearing black coat. Kindly advice
Sapan Ahlawat
12 August 2019 at 09:23
If my name in my documents is X, and my name so called by my friends is "Y". Can I file an affidavit in a case u/s 125 against me by the name "Y". Thanks
N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha
12 August 2019 at 05:54
"May Allah Bless you with A Beautiful Feast of Sacrifice on this auspicious day of Eid -Ul-Adha ". Joyful Bakra Eid 2019 to all of you.
Anonymous
12 August 2019 at 00:09
Hi
I took a flat on rent a year on a three-year' agreement. The broker had asked me to pay three-month rent as a brokerage. I had a half of the amount at the start by a cheque and gave him a post dated cheque of Sept 2019. However, since last two months the bedroom has been leaking due to rain and made several requests to the broker and the owner to repair it. However , the broker didn't help , rather he refused to take my calls. Since he has failed to provide his service , I have cancelled the PDC. My question, what will be the consequences. Will I have to pay the PDC amount despite he failed in tue service?
Mohammed Vaid
11 August 2019 at 20:04
Hi,
We are living in Mumbai since my father's birth i.e. before 1945. We are Indian by birth and our ancestors too. Infact our ancestors are from Gujrat, India. Now what I have understood from home ministers speech that every Indian Muslim needs to prove their parents were staying in India post independence but before 1951.What I need to do? What all documents would be required to be submitted? Please advice.
Mohammed Vaid
11 August 2019 at 20:00
Hi,
I am from Mumbai, Maharashtra. My father was born on 2 April 1937, British India. I need his birth certification but don't know where and how to approach. Please advice.
Anonymous
11 August 2019 at 19:34
Please help me I am a teacher in central university school with 6yrs service as TGT, my wife is a PGT in Telangana govt. Both are residing in Hyderabad. Recently I am transferred to Darbhanga school on administrative grounds. Please help me is there any legal advice for revoking my transfer and to consider my spouse employ condition. Thanks
V.N.K. MENON
11 August 2019 at 17:30
Dear experts, may I use collective wisdom.
I am giving below the present order which is not compatible with the previous proceedings before another Magistrate.
From the date and events I feel I have given a correct picture of the matter.
In the circumstances, I made a proposal. Experts may kindly guide me to the best way suitable. Next Date of hearing is 14th.
( PRESENT ORDER)
HON. HARUN PRATAP, MM-04 COURT NO ., ____COURT, NEW DELHI
CASE NO. 4077/18
DT .13,05.2019
IN THE MATTER OF:
STATE
VS.
UNTRACE
Heard. Perused.
(ORDER)
Adjournment to sought PSE by the complainant.
Be put up for entire PSE on 14.08.2019 as last opportunity
to the complainant
(order ends)
===============================================================================
[ORIGINAL TITLE DETAILS = CC NO. 99/1/16 BY PREDECESSOR MM HON. SUNIL GARG WHEREAS THE TITLE GIVEN ABOVE IS QUITE DIFFERENT]
A .... COMPLAINANT
(address given)
V/s
(1) B
(2) C …. ACCUSED /
RESPONDENTS
================================================================================
================================================================================
[PROPOSED DRAFT]
APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL ON BEHALF OF COMPLAINANT
AS HE LOST FAITH IN THIS COURT
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
----------------------------------------
The Complainant very humbly submit as follows:
Sequence of dates & events is stated as follows:
------------------
03/08/2016
----------------
Complaint was filed in C.R. Park, P.S. for having committed pilferage and theft of articles [i.e. valuable clothes meant for our grand son for his birthday brought from abroad].
Cause of action arose when after unreasonable delay the packet was returned marked “refused” after theft and weighed less and that too with some old material after some rituals. Subsequently, I inspected delivery slip at the Post Office and it was promptly delivered to the addressee.
------------------
17.09.2016
------------------
I approached the court u/s 156(3) CrPC as Police refused to file FIR.
Hon’ble MM Garg after hearing the Complainant was pleased to make Accused No. 2 as accused No. 1 and called for ATR from SHO, C.R. Park.
------------------
03/10/2016
------------------
ATR filed by SI alongwith FIR bearing No. ___/ 16.
======================
RTI Reply with Delivery Slip
=======================
---------------
14.10.2017
----------------
RTI application was sent by me to Post Master to give an authentic copy of Delivery Record.
----------------
30.10.2017
-----------------
Received a certified copy of Delivery Record from Postal Supdt. On scrutiny it is clearly visible that a paper with forged signature of another person was stapled and taken a photocopy which was attested by the concerned and sent to the Complainant to save the Postman and Accused No.1 from prosecution obviously for extraneous considerations. Judicially noticeable facts need not be proved S-56/57 Evidence Act.
-----------------
12.11.2017
------------------
Copy of the same was passed on to the Police alongwith details. Obviously investigation was supposed to be carried out.
===================================================================
In view of above, Application filed u/s 319 CrPC to arraign Accused No. 3: not given in FIR
= ==================================================================
------------------
01.10.2018 –
-----------------
D.O.H. in t his court. I received a Notice dt. 10.07.2018 from this court through the said I/O.
On this day I filed an application u/s 319 CrPC r/w 192 & 193 IPC for arraigning Post Master as Accused No. 3 as he was not named in FIR 257/2016. It is judicially noticeable fact that document had been forged by stapling a paper as elaborated in the application. No summons were issued to Accused-3 u/s 91 CrPC to produce original Delivery Record in his possession.
-------------------------------------
11.12.2018 & 12. 02.2018 –
----------------------------------
Adjournments, but no final report u/s 173 was filed.
----------------
13.05.2019
-----------------
(GIVEN ABOVE)
An order was passed by this Ld. Court by grossly changing the title made by Predecessor MM as stated above from: “V.N.K. Menon vs. Greeshma” to “State vs. Untrace”. Postal employees cannot be untraceable and moreso, “refused” has been remarked by the Postman against addressee.
STATUS OF THE CASE (given below) : gives a false picture in view of the above facts.
In the facts and circumstances, there is reason to believe that I will not get justice.
(end of draft)
=================================================================================
=================================================================================
====================
CASE STATUS REPORT
====================
Metropolitan Magistrate, ___________
Case Details
Case Type CR CASES - CRIMINAL CASE
Filing Number 20877/2018 Filing Date 07-07-2018
Registration Number 4077/2018 Registration Date 09-07-2018
CNR Number DLSE020208892018 (Note the CNR number for future reference) View QR Code / Cause Title
Case Status
First Hearing Date 09th July 2018
Next Hearing Date 14th August 2019
Stage of Case Pre Summoning Evidence
Court Number and Judge 84-Metropolitan Magistrate
Petitioner and Advocate
1) STATE
Respondent and Advocate
1) FINAL REPORT
Acts
Under Act(s) Under Section(s)
IPC 379,34
FIR Details
Police Station C. Park
FIR Number-------
Year 2016
History of Case Hearing
Judge Business On Date Hearing Date Purpose of hearing
Metropolitan Magistrate 09-07-2018 01-10-2018 Misc./ Appearance
Metropolitan Magistrate 01-10-2018 01-12-2018 Misc./ Appearance
Metropolitan Magistrate 01-12-2018 12-02-2019 Misc./ Appearance
Metropolitan Magistrate 12-02-2019 13-05-2019 Pre Summoning Evidence
Metropolitan Magistrate 13-05-2019 14-08-2019 Pre Summoning Evidence
Interim Orders
Order Number Order Date Order Details
1 01-12-2018 COPY OF ORDER
2 13-05-2019 COPY OF ORDER
G. ISAAC
11 August 2019 at 16:58
A minimum of 20 employees in the role in the prededing 12 months is stipulated as per the conferment of permanent status Act 1981.A cooperative bank had a strength of 22 employees at its role in the year 1983 and now the number had fallen to 15. Whether the act could be enforced now in respect of this bank/
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Suit for recovery involving equitable mortgage
Needed appropriate draft for suit in cases of housing loans involving Equitable mortgage.Please