Anonymous
13 July 2026 at 07:17
A person gives Rs. 1.23 crore amount to company for purchase of Plots. Plots were not sold to complainant so, complainant demanded his given money back. Two persons as authorised signatory/properietor gave 1-1 cheque of different bank account of same name companies' cheques as 1 crore and 50 lakh rupees respectively. The 1 crore cheque is given in sept. 2024 by first person. The 50 lacs cheque given in Nov. 2025 by second person. The second person had handover the firm to first person in September 2024. And the second person has remained the firm on same name as before. The cheque of 1 crore has been returned and a complaint under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act filed against first accused person for Rs. 1 crore amount as written in cheque in court by mentioning that “Rs. 1.03 (in figure and in words) amount was paying by complainant to accused (legally debt) for that the accused has given cheque for Rs. 1 crore.” The calculation found at that time is Rs. 1.03 crore But, the real calculation found after filing complaint is Rs. 1.23 crore. Now, the complainat want to return the 50 lacs cheque given by other person. What amount of total debt the complainant can mention in demand notice given after return of 50 lacs cheque. Can he mention that the total debt of Rs. 1.23 crore with demanding 50 lacs as written on cheque amount in second demand notice or demand 23 lacs only against other accused person?
- Total amount of the two cheques (1 and 0.50) is Rs. 1.50 crore and legally debt is Rs. 1.23 crore.
- Amount shown in first notice and complaint is 1.03 crore but acturally is Rs. 1.23 crore. can do any amentment in complaint? what other remedy? Can not effect on legality of demant notice ?
- The amount of 1 crore not received back to complainant yet.
Anonymous
12 July 2026 at 15:19
Hi. My parents are extremely worried about this, I would appreciate alot any guidance. There was a land owned by a guy which was given to him through gram panchayat about 30-40 yrs ago. Since then the land has been sold through GPA(power of attorney) to multiple people. My parents recently bought this land with literally all their life savings. Now since the new GPA rules rules out by delhi govt my parents are extremely worried what will happen and either they own the land or not. I know gpa isn't owning a land but well the clauses include everything in the GPA.
SOME DETAILS:
The seller and my parents both are the same village residents.
The land is under lal dora
We have all the documents of all seller and buyers till today.
Please give some good news. We are stressing over here. If it's a issue please tell us what we can do now.
Nikhil chaudhary
09 July 2026 at 23:23
In my case before the Haryana appellate court, the civil appeal was dismissed in default, and the appellant has filed a restoration application within limitation. Is the respondent's advocate required to obtain and file a fresh Vakalatnama to appear in the restoration proceedings, or can the advocate continue on the basis of the original Vakalatnama already on record? If the restoration application is handled by same advocate, who handled the main appeal, Then again the sign of respondent is needed in vakalatnama?
Jasvinder
06 July 2026 at 21:38
A pvt ltd company have 2 director.
One director on behalf of company filed a injuction suit in civil court against me.
After much up and down in one other case between these 2 director of company one director other than who file injuction, given statement in high court that he had given resignation long back before this injuction suit and this director had no Locus standi to sue on behalf of pvt ltd company and this director who resign never stand in this injuction suit before the court.
When I came to know this I file o7r11 that this director had no locus standi to file any case in absence of resolution of board of director as Corum is not complete because of one director resignation and because of this no meeting can held and no resolution can be passed.
Am I right at this point.
Any case law.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
03 July 2026 at 12:22
I have applied for trademark registration for my business name, but the application is still under examination. Can I start using the brand name and logo for my products and marketing before the trademark is officially registered? Are there any legal risks if someone else claims ownership during this period?
Anonymous
01 July 2026 at 09:51
I want to know whether it is fair for IBPS to change the exam pattern just two months before the examination. Many candidates, including me, have been preparing for this exam for years based on the previous pattern, and such a last-minute change completely affects our preparation and strategy. On top of that, IBPS announced that there are zero vacancies for the Marketing Officer post, which came as a huge disappointment after years of preparation. Can such sudden decisions be challenged legally? Do candidates have any rights if these changes are made so close to the exam and significantly affect their chances?
Anonymous
30 June 2026 at 19:11
Can I add the qualification in service record if my last semester exam pending (academic class completed) at the time of joining govt service and passes without intimating dept.can i apply direct recruitment on the basis of that degree
Anonymous
26 June 2026 at 22:47
I inherited a 50% undivided share in an industrial land parcel along with my sister. The land can be physically divided into two equal portions, each having independent road frontage. The only requirement is that each co-owner's separate share must be recognized and mutated through the subdivision process prescribed by the industrial authority.
The original Agreement to Sale/Allotment with the industrial authority also states that the allottees shall abide by the rules and procedures issued by the authority from time to time. I am therefore trying to comply with the prescribed subdivision procedure.
However, the industrial authority has informed me that it cannot issue notice to a non-cooperating co-owner and requires both co-owners to sign the subdivision application. My sister is refusing to cooperate.
Without subdivision, I cannot obtain approvals such as a new building permission or land use conversion for my inherited share. As a result, I am unable to independently improve, develop or realize the value of my property, even though my share is undisputed.
I do not wish to file a partition suit if it can reasonably be avoided. My only objective is to have my already inherited 50% share recognized through subdivision and mutation so that I can independently exercise my rights over that share.
My question is: Can one co-owner indefinitely block the other co-owner from exercising these rights simply by refusing to sign a subdivision application? Have any courts directed authorities to issue notice to the non-cooperating co-owner and proceed with subdivision, or is a civil partition suit the only practical remedy in such situations?
It appears unfair that while the industrial authority requires allottees to comply with its rules and procedures, the present process effectively allows one co-owner to indefinitely prevent the other from complying with those very procedures and from exercising legitimate property rights.
Anonymous
26 June 2026 at 19:21
My neighbour has put the big, lightening religious board above his door ,on common hallway wall. Is that legal. Can I object it legally.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Tenant succession and redevelopment benefits
I belong to a family that has been living as tenants in a very old wada (traditional building) in Guruwar Peth, Pune, for more than 60 years.
The original rent receipts and tenancy were in the name of my grandmother, who was the original tenant. She has now passed away.
After her death, my family has continued to live in the same rented house without any interruption. We have never vacated the property and are still in continuous physical possession of the premises.
My uncle was also living with our family in the same house. However, his wife and children have been living permanently in their village for the last 5–6 years after his marriage and have not been residing in this property. After my uncle's death, only my family continues to live in the house.
I would like to understand my legal position during the redevelopment process.
My question is:
Since only my family is currently residing in the property and my uncle's wife and children have been living separately in the village for several years, will they also have any legal right or benefit in the redevelopment? Or will the redevelopment benefits primarily belong to the family members who are actually residing in and occupying the rented premises?