Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Harsha Harsha   03 May 2012 at 17:58

13b

my 498A, 406 is pending in court. Meanwhile my in-laws asked me to come t=for mutual. And they told they will settle half of the settlement and I need to withdraw the case and after that thy told they will give remaning amount n file 13B.

But since i know their chareactr , i don believ that thy ll cum for remainng amount and thy won cum for mutual later. all they need s to withdraw 498A.

wen i objctd, they will sign in agreement to provide the remaing n sign fr 13B.

is it valid? will the agremeent copy signed will b used for mutual later?

NITIN   03 May 2012 at 14:18

Ownership of property

Dear sir,

As per Family law property of father,after the death of father distribution is equally between son & daughter.

Any decision given by supreme court if a son who has done all take care of his father till last day of his father death.

So the property in the name of father is transfer to those son who take care of father till death.

if u have detail about case law pls send me in this mail nitinjain66@yahoo.com

Thanks

Pooja Bhalla   03 May 2012 at 11:20

Anticipatory bail in case of evidence--urgent

I hv concrete evidence in the form of Medical report of physical assault and NEFT transactions where my husband has been taking money from me, will his AB get rejected or he will still get a bail ,what r the chances

saurav   03 May 2012 at 09:55

Child right over property.

Can a mother while seprating from her husband and getting lump sum maintenance also has right to waive or limitize the right of minor child (male/female) over the property of childs father. Whether any right of minor survives when he attains majority?

Shantanu Wavhal   03 May 2012 at 02:00

Divorce at notary and sub-registrar.

can someone pl. provide authentic reference to the following statements ?





Bombay High Court declared:

Any Advocate helps in executing, even Drafting & Preparing Divorce Deed, will be punished with 10 days imprisonment. It includes Notary.



All Family Court Exhibited this Notice Right in Entrance of Court, to beware false divorce deeds. Divorce is valid only through Court. No Customary Divorce under Sec 29 HMA apply for Divorce in home.


Now It is strictly practiced in Mumbai.

joshi   02 May 2012 at 23:57

How to prevent cyber law cases

I have been seperated from my wife since last 11 months. Still no police cases from any parties.

Also no response from any side
I have accsess her mails from cyber cafe & sometimes from my previous company.
only accessed and not sent any mail from her account.

But since last few days think she might came to know that I am looking into her mail box. She immeediatley changed her password 2 week back. I have never tried to access her account again.

So would like to know what preventions should I to take to avoid cyber cases ?

HOw those cases affects me ?

supabcdefgh   02 May 2012 at 23:24

498a and divorce?

Assume a case:
Man is ADHD but successful.
She continuously nags and insults him, locks him out of home, throws him out of In-Laws.
This caused physical violence of various degree in him, which was beyond his control.
Despite all these, he is being punished with 498a 3 years imprisonment and fine and loss of Goverment Job.

The main question: (please don't digress)
Before going to jail his plea:
"My violence was beyond my control. After 3 years too, nothing is going to change. After 3 years in jail, please grant me divorce immediately"

Will this be granted? Is there any similar past case with 498a convict where wife does not wish to give divorce?

S P Goel   02 May 2012 at 20:57

Sir, advocate required for cyber law case pls

Respected sir, I live in East Delhi, my court will be KKD, my son used my ID from my IP or other IP and generated 3 faked e mails from my side to him/ his mama and used against me by in DV case filed by my wife. I sent e mail to Yahoo, filed NCR( No further action taken ), sent legal notice to 3 person, acknowlegment of courier is available.This has become the main part against me in DV case. Professional advocates of Lawyersclubindia advised me to lodge a case under cyber law or information technology act, this will also help me in DV case which is under process. Sir, I humbly request you if you are ready to help me in filing the case and till end. I shall be oblige to you. S P Goel, Delhi Phone 9810101999 , E mail spgoel118@yahoo.com , pls sir

amol   02 May 2012 at 20:43

Guardianship

whether an application (Misc Application in the civil court) for seeking custody of a child can be filed by a third person i.e. by an aunt (mavshi) under the Guardians and wards act under the circumstances when a legitimate father and mother of a child both are expired and grandfather and grandmother are alive. she is in custody of a aunt after her mother's death , father died before mother, real uncle of a minor child is issueless couple so whether grandma / fa and uncle fight for guarian ship and custody or what stand shold they take as aunt has already filed a appli against them pls explain according to recent position of law Adv Amol Joshi

Dhruv   02 May 2012 at 16:51

Family arrangement under a will

Dear All,
'F' is a father. He has a daughter 'D' from his first wife 'W1'. He remarried to second wife 'W2'. He has two sons from his second marriage 'S1' and S2'. S2 predeceased F. F left a Will which is not yet probated. In the Will he states that he owns one house property 'H1' solely and the other house property 'H2' jointly with his wife. The will states that his share in both the house property should be equally distributed between 'D' and 'S1'.
After his death his second wife'W2' claims that she is the sole owner of 'H2', as the share certificate only states her name as the owner. Her name was only for convinience purpose as is claimed by the daughter 'D' from first wife.
Now all the parties have mutually agreed that 'D' will forego her share in 'H2' in lieu of increased share in 'H1', while the 'S1' will reduce his share in 'H1 and forego his share in 'H2' and that 'W2' will be the sole owner of 'H2'.
Can a family arrangement be drawn on the above basis as the shares in 'H1' were never in dispute. Now the shares in H1 are being changed. Will it be a valid family arrangement? Or is the Will to be followed in case of H1 and family arrangement be drawn only for H2?