Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 14:39

JURISDICTION

I have problem with one intermediateries which is registered as Limited company with Stock Exchange. I want to Police complaint against Directors of the company. As per jurisdiction, I have to file FIR with Police Station A. But P I not ready apply certain IPC Section which can harm my case fact. Can I file complaint from other police Station B or likewise instead of A. Can I do this and what will be effects of ?

Thanks in advance,
Reetu

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 13:57

Bail Application - U/S. 376

A was the relative of B. B was 16 years old. A gave something to eat to B. Therafter B became unconscious and then A committed Rape on B. A was arrestted easily and has been charged U/S. 376. After some time, B dies natural death. A is in jail since last one year. What could be conditions & requirements of Bail in High Court, as he has already been denied bail by sessions court.

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 13:02

about termination of bail given by C.J.M

a bail granted by cjm u/s 498ipc.is it possible for cjm to terminate it.

condition:- on pledge paper the sign. of pledgee was not mentioned & it is verifier by adv. (concerned autho.)

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 12:58

about termination of bail given by C.J.M

a bail granted by cjm u/s 498ipc.is it possible for cjm to terminate it.

condition:- on pledge paper the sign. of pledgee was not mentioned & it is verifier by adv. (concerned autho.)

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 11:57

caste change S.C to B.C

DEAR EXPERTS,
I WANT TO CHANGE CASTE SC TO BC IN ANDRA.P STATE WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE TO CHANGE ?
IS IT POSSIBLE
I USED SC RESERVATION FOR SCOLORSHIP
IF I WISH TO CHANGE LIKE THAT WHAT HAPPEN TO ME

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 08:15

search of house

my house was searched by police from outstation by search warrant issued from the court. During the search the local police, my estranged wife who got the search order and the outstation police were present. the outstation police had asked the local police to accompany them. During the search for my wife things... the entire proceedings was video taped by a person whom we didnt know but was with the police.... my wife was accompanied by her lawyer who refused to be identifed during the search and was there during the entire search.

1. Can the local police also be there for the search along with police authorirsed for search?
2. can this search be videotaped? if yes by whom? can wife arrange the search to be videotaped or only police can? does she have the right?
3. can her lawyer come to my house during search and be there during search? if not can i ask her lawyer to leave my house?
4. Can I ask for copy of the video tape taken during search and also details of persons present during search through RTI?

Arvind Singh Chauhan   25 June 2010 at 22:24

GENERAL PROBLEM

Generally it is seen. when the police seeks remand, magistrate grants without looking the legality and without carefully checking the case diary.

One of my client was caught was with "Jangali Lahsun" (Alium Atrachiyi). He is the resident of high altitude of himaliya and collection and cultivating herbs is their main source of bread. Police sought remand that it was removed from reserve forest. Remand was granted under Section 26 Indian Forest act. At the time of hearing my argument was, police is unable to show that collection of this herb is prohibited illegal under particular law. They only says that it was removed from reserve forest. even police does not know the botanical name of this herb or it's use and unable to say that this area comes under reserve forest. my bail application was rejected.

My question is that if without any prima facie proof of offence court grants judicial remand. What is the remedy against such baseless remand order and illegal detention specially against officer granting such remand believing on the story of police.

Ajai Kumar Roy   25 June 2010 at 17:38

Car accident

One minor car accident involve case complainant simple injury and recovery car taken handed over self custody by order of court and Driver on bail but driver want to not appear in police station Due to police harrassment. Enquiry Officer not made charge sheet after expiry of 30 days from accident date I.O. taken extension of time and want parede Identification of Accused in police station. Where as complainant false FIR written contents as under The car was driven by lady but after complainant fell down the man sitting next her took the driver and drove the car away. This is wrong statement of compalinant.The car not driven by lady. Police harrases the driver he know who's lady member drove the car. Car not recover on spot after summoning the SHO/I.O Car surrender in Police Station.
Driver want to appear only before court.if possable please guide me what step should be taken by driver.

Anonymous   25 June 2010 at 17:37

Parede Identification In police Station

One minor car accident involve case complainant simple injury and recovery car taken handed over self custody by order of court and Driver on bail but driver want to not appear in police station Due to police harrassment. Enquiry Officer not made charge sheet after expiry of 30 days from accident date I.O. taken extension of time and want parede Identification of Accused in police station. Where as complainant false FIR written contents as under The car was driven by lady but after complainant fell down the man sitting next her took the driver and drove the car away. This is wrong statement of compalinant.The car not driven by lady. Police harrases the driver he know who's lady member drove the car. Car not recover on spot after summoning the SHO/I.O Car surrender in Police Station.
Driver want to appear only before court.if possable please guide me what step should be taken by driver.

Adv. Vipin Kumar   25 June 2010 at 17:31

homosexuality

in which case delhi highcourt decide this is not against sec 377 of IPC ?
in which case sc decide lie detector and other tests are not have any evedential value ?