Global
27 June 2010 at 20:24
We purchased some products from our supplier for around 5 lacs, the chq was bounced and we had given 2 chqs. of 2 lacs and 3 lacs for the above dishonour. We requested them to present the chq with confirmation. They also agreed. They asked for confirmation to present the chqs after a month. We requested to present the 3 lacs chq and hold the 2 lacs chq. they also presented and the same was honoured. After some days suddenly they present the 2 lacs chq without our knowledge which in turn got bounced. Shall we raise a defamation claim against the supplier. The communications between us are through e-mail.
Pls. help to proceed.
pkm
27 June 2010 at 10:52
What will be the fate of cheuque bounced cases filled by the company itself wind up ?
Vijay Kumar
27 June 2010 at 08:33
A cheque dated 10/5/2010 drawn on Centurion Bank of Punjab(CBoP) has been issued.CBoP had merged with HDFC Bank about 2 years ago.Cheque was presented to HDFC Bank on 26/5/2010 and was returned with a report "Account Closed".
What defence,the drawer/accused may take? Kindly suggest.
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 23:18
Husband filed divorce under the ground cruelty against the innocent wife. Thereafter wife filed Domestic Violence Complaint.
Husband filed Quash petition and the same is pending before High Court. Now DV case is stayed by High COurt
During pendancy of both the cases, she committed suicide leaving a letter as dying declaration that her husband only spoiled her life.
Can her father proceed with DV case?
Still one month passed by, no investigation was made on husband.?
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 22:26
In 138 cases no defence evidence and documents marked in the trial by the accused's counsel and after the completion of trial can we mark documents and evidence in appellate court. if it is any judgments available.
tusharcosmic
26 June 2010 at 19:50
Will he/she be charged under negoitiable instrument act 138 or 420 or both or none ?
T.R. Ganesan
26 June 2010 at 19:43
I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.
My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.
I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.
Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.
T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.
T.R. Ganesan
26 June 2010 at 19:40
I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.
My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.
I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.
Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.
T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.
dipankar
26 June 2010 at 15:46
what ipc sections can be lodged for sending obscene messages on mobile.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
marking doc and reexamine or retrail
In course of business some transaction between accused and complainant. whenever the complainant send goods the accused paid amount through bank. later the complainant asked guarantee for future transaction and the accused gave 20 cheques immediately after receiving the cheques he deposited in his bank all the cheques dishonored in the mean time the accused sent letter for return back the cheques and also complaint lodged against the complainant. when the trail was commenced the accused advocate not bring the fact of case before trail court and not marking the documents and examined any DW witnesses including accused in the trail he was convicted. now the case in the appeal stage i through that 311 and 391 petition to be filed for marking doc and reexamine or any chance for retrial ---- any suggestions and also give any favorable judgments