Sir,my mother took money from financier in 2018 and gave 6 promissory notes for 1,53000 each to him with her own writing and signature and we have Xerox of those copies and later in the year 2021one month back he gave us two notices regarding that one notice is we gave him 5 lakhs promissory notes and as time was going to complete for the note and we gave him 5 lakh cheque to him and later it was bounced due to insufficient funds and another notice about 5 lakh promissory note and to pay it in time, here fact is we never gave him cheque and we never give him two five lakhs promissory notes also so what to do sir how to take action on him,he sent the fake promissory note to my father through what's app sir
In my company cable was stolen, so i file FIR for company (In FIR my name is mention). So what happen if i left company in future. Is this make me in tribble in future? Please help me.
Certified copies obtained from court. My query is that can these certified copies from court can be submitted as exhibit before another court.
Hello sir Iapplied for return of property and then the court has allowed my application and accordingly I dispatched the order but now police is saying that subsequntly the case become session triable and therefore I have to seek order from the session court. can u advice what to do in such cases
Respected,
I had illegally charged more for car parking at the railway station, so to which authority can I complain now and can I register an FIR against the person who charged more price for parking as he was abusing me at the time.
My late father passed away intestate in 2020 leaving behind his widow ( my aged mom ) and 4 sons - 5 class 1 legal heirs
MUM
S1
S2
S3 - Me
S4
He left behind both moveable and immovable properties
Moveable Properties
In 2018, late father had created 3 FD's and had appointed 3 sons as nominees separately as detailed below:
FD 1 - nominee S1
FD 2 - nominee S4
FD 3 - Nominee S3
That just after his death youngest son ( S4 ) committed fraud and cheating by fraudulently changing the nominee ( Changing to his his name ) held at fixed deposit FD 1 after his death using the late father's registered SIM card . That a section 91 request made to THE bank revealed the full changes in nomination made after the late father's death . the fraudulent change in nominee pertains to FD 1 only.
Further more RBI in its report under the ombudsman scheme also highlighted the same
September 2020
My MUM filed a criminal case against the youngest son ( S4 ) where cognizance was taken under section 420/120 B and was granted anticipatory bail and ordered to deposit back all monies transferred to his account after the late father's death . He has complied with his ABP order and the case is under trial. S3 ( myself ) i am the witness in Criminal Case filed by by mother against S4
October 2020
S4 then files a frivolous partition suit and deliberately included all self acquired properties ( moveable and immoveable ) of the late father in addition to including all other defendants self acquired property as well - All this to give the Impression of an alleged property dispute when none existed . We have responded via our WS and the TPS is pending
Since my mother's only source of income was the interests money from the FD 's where's nomination was disputed , my mother continues to face extreme financial hardship as the banks were unable to settle the money to nominee as custodians of the legal heirs of the deceased
March 2021
MUM applied for a succession certificate currently pending as money is urgently needed for survival
July 2021
S4 now filed a criminal complaint at Magistrates under Section 420/120b/406 against S3 ( me) saying i have committed fraud by transferring FD 3 to my name.
That i am the custodian till the succession matter is resolved. And that in the succession case i have already submitted my WS for a Joint certificate and 1/5th share of all debt securities.
That this criminal case is nothing but a counter blast case and a harassment at that
it has only recently been filed at ACJM and is awaiting allocation to JMFC. Thereafter i understand a magistrate may or may not take cognizance. Now if they are stupid enough and take cognizance even though it is well settled in law that NOMINEE is a custodian and not owner. How can i prevent cognizance from being taken in a frivolous case.
My question:
Can i approach the JMFC pre cognizance?
If the Magistrates stupidly take cognizance u/S 406/420 without understanding the above point, can i appear in person without fearing the risk of custody or do i have to apply for Anticipatory bail ?
Or should i write to ACJM now?
Or should i put a response directly to JMFC who is allocated the case pre cognizance? Will he/she read response from accused before cognizance is taken ?
What can i do in this case ?
Hi am a middle class person where is my take home salary is 17k, my mobile(New phone which i was took in EMI) was theft by thief 4 months back, i reported to police station regarding this and they didn't take FIR instead they told to register on elost(but my mobile was theft not lost) i registered in elost after that also they denied to take FIR, so i written mail to commissioner office regarding this so i got FIR after 10 days by meeting every 2 star 1 star inspectors for every one told i need FIR, now i got a letter after 4 months telling that we are closing the case, i went to ACMM court, to inform magister to tell that they have threaten me telling all the details, but magistrate informed me appoint one lawyer against this investigation, but magistrate didnt ask single que to police why you peoples did like this instead he told me to meet the lawyer, as i told am not in the position to appoint a lawyer in this case due to financial issue, i have all the proofs(Complaint letter(in complaint letter i have mentioned about thief and my mobile location but they took complaint as they need), elost copy, mail copy written to commissioner, FIR copy(after FIR they have not done place visit also), my mobile location snaps which is located for 4 days after theft everything, i informed magistrate telling all this points they have not done any investigation, but when i visit police station i didnt get justice and now when i meet magistrate also i didnt get justice giving al this inputs, i felt so many times to give up when travelling daily to police station and went to court twice but still am trying to get justice, my mobile cost is may be small for others but its very big loss for me and i paid all the EMI also after losing my mobile, i request to help me in this case to get my mobile as well and am fighting for justice.
from my side as a solution, i have written mail to all the mobile companies to introduce new technology where without user authentication mobile cannot be turn OFF so until mobile battery dies we can trace it so it will help to locate and identify i written this mail thinking others should not face like this problems
Court dismiss complaint u/s 203 any revision or appeal can be filled.
Hello,
I am previously a witness in a criminal cases u/S 420/ 120b instituted at Magistrates Court JMFC. 6 months down the line the accused in that case having been granted Anticipatory bail by ADJ has now made up a bogus case under Section 406/420/120 which he has filed at Magistrates JMFC as a counter blast
My question:
1) Can i appear before Magistrates before Cognizance is taken so as to give my version of events?
2 ) can i appear before magistrates after cognizance is taken and without going for ABP as i am 100% innocent and can validate that.
If the answer is yes please advise what i can do
If the answer is no surely its a travesty of justice that i have to go through the ABP process spend money just to prove a bogus case at trial.
Bail
Bail is allowed in high court but while drafting bail application there was typing error in fir no.( Fir no. Is changed) Thats why while pronouncing judgement there is error in judgement also. Will there be any difficulty for bail? What should be done to correct the judgement fir no.?