Can I get the arguments in detail from both the sides from constitutional law perspective. I am writing a case brief and Finding it difficult to get detailed arguments from both the side. Please reply asap.
Chartered Accountant service is an not essential service during lock down. So if the office opens & caught by police or Labour law department under which ACT & Which Sections they can file cases. What is the proof they can get? What is the solution Chartered Accountant is having? Pls suggest in detail.
If any section of any Act. Declared constitutional by constitutional bench of Apex court. does parliament repealed the same section in amending act. Or not.
Pls clarify at the earliest.....
Thanks & Regards
I need advise on setting up an online gambling company; Below options I'm considering correct me if i'm wrong
1) Register company in GOA & make accessible via mobile app across India
2) Register company in Delaware, USA & run it as a foriegn operator in the Indian market; risks associated with this approach
3) Looking for option 1 as it is cheaper than 2
4) Any south asian countries where I can register my company & run it as a foreign operator in India
5) what is the current scenario of our Online gambling laws; ideal Indian state supporting this business
6) Any other suggestions
in section 35(1A) it is written that "The State Bar Council may, either of its own motion or on application made to it by any person interested......" who all are included in 'person interested' and is their any supreme court judgement in which court explain the meaning of 'person interested'
can an advocate guilty of misconduct other than of professional nature like dowry be allowed to practice in court.
and can a person not having advocate client relationship be allowed to file complaint against an advocate under section 35 of Advocates Act,1961.
We are trying to construct the top roof in our flat and the top is open to taris, but the society secretary is stopping us from doing so citing many unfounded reasons but we want to do this legally.The roof is completely open you can see sky and its on top floor building is not old it can take more than enough load.
Please suggest what action to take so that no one is troubled by it.
Revenue Remedy applied before executive magistrate...
order pronounced against applicant.... he presented appealed before SDM, District Magistrate, Special secretary revenue dispute then high court and then supreme court.... everywhere he got judgment against him..
After 1 year of Final disposal at Supreme Court not allowed his SLP the applicant found some authentic evidence which could prove the respondent have no right exists in disputed land.... He could prove through those evidences that the respondents are not original legal heir of original owner of disputed land who died without any heir...
Then the question is which remedy remains in civil side to reopen and prove the respondents fake identification as legal heir of deceased owner of disputed land... or can lodge criminal complaint against respondents who presented themselves fraudulently as original heir ?? can any body present himself as complainant other than applicant? can third party (With or Without having interest in disputed land) can be complainant in this matter?
respected experts i had earlier asked you regarding it but you said to wait as it was initial stage.now the situation aggrivated.briefly i tell you my problem.
I am a permanant Asst. teacher of a Pvt.unaided school which is recognised by state board.my certificates are/were used by board to council for permission of a subject.on last year's march18,2020 Principal showcaused me saying court asked some documents as my ex husband summoned them in court to prove the RTI that they gave to my ex husband regarding me & they felt humiliated & will take action & prevented me from signing attendance register from next day & verbally told not to come to school despite giving 7 day deadline for response showcause.
I answered back that you provided RTI response without my knowledge then why i will be responsible & i am open to produce my case orders if they wish despite all are personal case with my ex.They faulty mentioned the MC case as GR case as well.after my answer to showcause during lockdown school started online class without me.i mailed,sent letter nummerous times even went still no cooperation & silence from them.From August,2020 they stopped salary without notice.i sent letters enquiring no ans.then i sent complaim to District Inspector of school, ADM(G), SDO & others. Deputy magistrate conducted hearing & they remain absent. Nexi i filed complain in PF & they tore attendance register to remove our name(with me two permanant & two temporary teachers name also removed) without mannaging committe resolution.Teachers leaded by two teacher representatives who themselves are MC member gave written complain to secretary.Our MC is technically inactive as some of them resigned or became dysfunctional & some are with me & some against.
District Education Officer also conducted hearing & still they remain absent & sent letter saying about my personal case & mentioned i lied in court & asked for two months time. my point is the MC case that they mentioned still i havenot got any summon & its subjudicial where school is not party.can they take that defence?rather I filed execution case in august,2020 & in this month of jan,2021 i got order in my favour against my ex husband in execution of maintainence case where he pray stay order mentioning the same case/grounds.his filled case of 2019 is still not heard & still no summon to me.Now District Inspector also called hearing in this week.Along with me they called two other teacher for same as they also got this kind of treatment with different reasons.I expect they will be again absent.
Now we/i am/are going to file Writ Petition.Our school is recognised but do not get any fund from govt.can the writ petition here be maintainable? plz help me to proceed.
Respected Sir/Madam, Kindly guide whether a case before the Hon'ble High Court can be filed Under Article 226 and Cr.P.C. 482 against a baseless order of Central Govt. Servant requiring urgent STAY or QUASHING as it is per contra violating Art. 14 and Art.21? Any other pre requisite provision is there for me to follow .Please help.