Tejvir Singh
23 July 2011 at 20:49
I have recently completed my LL.B. studies and thereafter applied for
certificate of enrolment to the State Bar Council(hereinafter refered
to as SBC) on 6th July,2011. SBC officials told me that I will get my
certificate of enrolment after considering all necessary documents in
meeting of 'Enrolment Committee' to be held on 26th July 2011. So
certificate of enrolment is expected to be issued to me in 1st or 2nd
week of August.
It is to be worth mentioning here that some candidates of my batch
got certificate of enrolment on the same day i.e. on the day when they
applied for certificate of enrolment, by simply paying additional fee
of Rs.3000 under 'Tatkaal Scheme'. Thus SBC issued them certificate of
enrolment, depicting on it the date of enrolment, even before meeting
of 'Enrolment Committee'.
On the contrary I will get my certificate of enrolment in the month
of August, depicting date of August as date of enrolment, even though
I had applied for the same prior to those applying under 'Tatkaal
Scheme'.
My queries to experts are as under:-
1. Because date of enrolment is the criteria to determine the
'Seniority of Advocates', is there any loss to me by abovesaid act of
SBC?
2. Whether abovesaid act of SBC is violative of Article 14 of
Constitution of India and infringing my Right to Equality, reason
being a person would get preference in getting certificate of
enrolment only because he has paid additional amount of Rs.3000 under
so called 'Tatkaal Scheme'
3. Will it effect me in any way in my future if an Advocate is senior
to me only 30 or 40 days? If yes, in what way?
4. Whether 'Tatkaal Scheme' made by SBC, which enables a candidate to
obtain certificate of enrolment on the very date of application by
paying Rs.3000 in addition to application fee, is null and void being
violative of Article 14? Moreover under 'Tatkaal Scheme', no proof of
urgency(Tatkaal) is required to be furnished by candidate applying for
same.
5. If said act of SBC is against legal principles, to whom complaint
can be made against SBC for said the violative act?
6. Whether or not filing a Writ against SBC is an appropriate remedy?
Hoping for a prompt response. With regards:- TEJVIR SINGH
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 23:18
Sir,
Please let me know the pros and cons of becoming a witness at the time divorce of some other person in the court (front of judge ) ? In addition to that please also tell if someone needs to be witness in such situation then what precaution he/she should take ?
Thanks for your help in advance.
AR
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 10:46
A NGO may reistered unger any statute i.e Socity, company etc.
Is PAN Card is mandatory for a NGO
Anonymous
21 July 2011 at 11:13
in some agreements the parties express certain words, the definitions of which are not available, because of this either of the parties may suffer, in such cases how the approaches to bring the agreement in the actual intention of the parties ?
Member (Account Deleted)
20 July 2011 at 20:01
What are grounds on which Hon'ble Supreme court can dismiss SLP?
Is It must for Hon'ble Supreme court to Give reasons for SLP dismissal?
What is the Meaning of SLP dissmed in Limine.
If SLP has been filed and The Opposite Party has filled a Affidavit and the court has given time for the Petitioner to file a counter Affidavit. Can this SLP be dismissed In Limine.
If there are 5 question of Laws on which the SLP has been filled and the Party is not able to prove 1 question of Law. The Other 4 question of Law are proved. Can the SLP be dissmed.
shrawani shagun jha
20 July 2011 at 08:58
when right to speak includes right to be silent then why right to life doesnot includes right to die?
Anonymous
16 July 2011 at 22:10
dear sir,
i sought information from rti through a cic order about a certified copy of a tax on property for which i have a copy.
the mcd even after cic order gave no reply to this order to provide me a certified copy of the tax paid, for which i said i have a copy.
THUS DELIBERATELY WITH MALAFIDE INTENT IT IS ESTABLISHED HAS NOT RESPONDED TO THE REQUEST DESPITE THE OBVIOUS THAT THE DOCUMENT IS AVAIALABLE WITH THEM
WHAT PENALTY FOR THIS MALFIDE VIOLATION OF CIC ORDER SHOULD I SEEK IN THE COMPLAINT THAT I PROPOSE TO LODGE.
THANKS VINAY KALA
JULY 16,11
Anonymous
13 July 2011 at 09:23
Sir,
Please let me know how the journey traveled in general compartment can be proven in court , as ticket is taken by railway ticket collector at the railway station.So What could be the way to prove journey of general compartment ?
AR
Anonymous
12 July 2011 at 19:49
Dear Experts,
What is the usual fees of advocates familiar with Constitutional law for drafting Supreme Court writ and appearing for case in Supreme Court? What would be the approximate rate for advocate who can appear in Supreme Court at lowest fees?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Dismissed Case
Sir,
As a layman how to know the case which is in the Court is : whether it is continuouing or dismissed ?
When sometimes petitioners not attending or sometimes accused not attenting the case
Is there any online way to know the status of the case which is before the Court, particularly in Tamil Nadu.