Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

shrawani shagun jha   20 July 2011 at 08:58

right to die

when right to speak includes right to be silent then why right to life doesnot includes right to die?

Anonymous   16 July 2011 at 22:10

deliberate manafide intent not to give info under rti penalty for

dear sir,

i sought information from rti through a cic order about a certified copy of a tax on property for which i have a copy.

the mcd even after cic order gave no reply to this order to provide me a certified copy of the tax paid, for which i said i have a copy.

THUS DELIBERATELY WITH MALAFIDE INTENT IT IS ESTABLISHED HAS NOT RESPONDED TO THE REQUEST DESPITE THE OBVIOUS THAT THE DOCUMENT IS AVAIALABLE WITH THEM

WHAT PENALTY FOR THIS MALFIDE VIOLATION OF CIC ORDER SHOULD I SEEK IN THE COMPLAINT THAT I PROPOSE TO LODGE.

THANKS VINAY KALA

JULY 16,11

Anonymous   13 July 2011 at 09:23

Journey

Sir,
Please let me know how the journey traveled in general compartment can be proven in court , as ticket is taken by railway ticket collector at the railway station.So What could be the way to prove journey of general compartment ?

AR

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 19:49

What is the usual fees of lawyers for drafting Supreme Court writ

Dear Experts,

What is the usual fees of advocates familiar with Constitutional law for drafting Supreme Court writ and appearing for case in Supreme Court? What would be the approximate rate for advocate who can appear in Supreme Court at lowest fees?

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 16:13

226 or 227

Any case law which will help me to understand in basic the difference between Artilce 226 & 227 of the Consitution of India, 1949

Or sir with kind help can u pls explain me

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 15:52

supreme court decision.

If the views of the Ssupreme court expressed in an earlier decision are explained in a subsequent decision of the supreme court, the explanantion in the subsequent decision will have to be followed by the high court, even if the subsequent decision is rendered by a smaller Bench of the supreme court.

Query: any example what does the above want to say .

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 15:17

Division Bench reference not binding.

A Judgment delivered by a Division bench on a reference made by a single bench with the help of Chief Justice of the High Court, since such judgment would not be a judgment at all, and has no existence in law, becasue such a reference was tantamount to usurping the juridicrtion of the chief Justice.

The judgment delivered by the Division bench cannot be called as a binding precedent as it was a reference by a single bench to the division bench.

Help me & pls do support the answer with the case law.

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 11:49

Supreme Court citation

Dear Experts,

I am not able to recall the exact words of Hon'ble Supreme Court in a judgment. It was about the following of precedent in judgments. Supreme court had said that precendent cannot be the sole basis for judgments, because if a wrong precendent is already being followed by court in past, a wrong cannot be allowed by court to continue forever. Hence struck down about blindly following a precedent. If anyone could provide me that judgment/s.

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 09:58

Removal from service

I have been removed from service after 24+ yrs after a departmental enquiry. The IA has reported that there was no evidence against me in the enquiry but the disciplinary authority differs and without further enquiry, summarily removed me from service.This is against principle of natural justice. Do I have a chance get redressal legally ?

Raja   12 July 2011 at 00:06

Applicability of RTI to Private Banks

How to get information from ICICI Bank within the purview of RTI act 2005 ?