Jitendra sharma
23 August 2015 at 11:20
I served for nearly 5 years in central govt. As class 1 officer and then got inducted into another department of central govt by interview basis only, in the same grade, but they projected it as direct recruitment or transfer basis. In the advertisement in employment news and appointment letter it was mentioned that seniority and service rendered would be counted for all purposes and pay protected. Now in the draft seniority list they have not protected our seniority as well as past service. What rules do we have to seek?? Pls clarify .
MSRAO
23 August 2015 at 10:28
How much time can i take to appeal in HC after the judgement of district court
Adv B.B.Gambhir #9814820602
23 August 2015 at 09:58
Charanjit singh filed a suit for declaration that my father Natha singh is missing from 10 years and he presumed dead against brothers mother sister of natha Singh and further claimed share being coparcener Now at the stage natha Singh appeared and submitted his affidavit and other proofs of living. What should I do now how can I claim the share in property
basavaraj shiromani
23 August 2015 at 09:20
A Bank Manager filed recovery suit by signing all the papers including vakalat etc. During pendency of the suit, he transfered to another branch. New Manager entered in the litigation without his vakalat.
whether the manager without enganging the advocate by filing his vakalat as afresh continue the litigation pending or vakalat is necessary
S Singh
23 August 2015 at 01:16
I am the sole proprietor of a firm.
Recently while filing of my assets in relation to a case in Civil Court regarding payment of Court fees, I did not mentioned my proprietary firm name in the Schedule of Movable and Immovable Properties whereas I have mentioned all my properties.
The opposite party has come to know this.
Can it be said that I have not mentioned some of my properties details in good faith?
Whereas only the proprietary firm's name was not disclosed?
Plz. Help.
RK Yadav
22 August 2015 at 10:56
Dear All,
I want to conform a rs 100 stamp agreement with notary is valid or not in land sale agreement.
RENGASAMY
22 August 2015 at 08:12
I am a purchaser agree with the seller to buy the land of rs.300000/- i pay the advance ts.100000/- the time 3 month. But i cant give balance money . The limitation barred .now i need my advance am filling a civil suit for rrfund money. I need my favour citations
Swarna kamal Chandra
21 August 2015 at 21:07
I filed an ejectment suit against my tenant who run a shop on reasonable requirement. I also run a business in a dilapilated market which was already declaired as unsafe building by the municipal corporation and fire brigade. Beside this my shop is only 77sft in measurement. Do I need to commison to establish my demand? Or the rent bill/trade licence (showing measurement of the shop) is enough to prove?
MSRAO
21 August 2015 at 20:10
Can the respondent violate or show disobedience to the interim order issued by honourable single judge of High Court if the the respondent appealed to division bench to suspend the interim order
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Gaurdian and coustody for muslim husband.
Respected Experts!
The wife ‘C’ (late) of my client ‘D’ was the only daughter of A & B, whose marriage was performed on 17.01.2014 as per the customs and traditions prevailing in the Muslim community, the C & D blessed with a female ‘E’ (Minor, born on 27.11.2014, now aged 4 months). C was suffering from breast cancer, but A & B suppressed the same and got the marriage. The Gynecologist diagnosed informed that since past a year, C was suffering with the cancer and C died due to cancer on 19.12.2014 i.e, after three weeks of her caesarian.
The last ceremonies performed and D very much attended. A & B, soon after the death of C changed their color and abused D for one or other reason even there is no fault of him. They forcibly took the custody of E from D and refused to handover. That since the date of death of the C, the E is with the A & B. There would be no welfare for E, if she continued with the A & B as the B is also suffering with the similar cancer and bed ridden. A & B are senior citizens. That the best interest and bright future of E demands that she should be placed under the care and custody of D immediately and further D being the fit and proper person entitled to act as guardian of E. Moreover, E is the only legal heir to the family D and there is no other child born. D repeatedly requested the A & B to place the care and custody of the E to D for her bright career and future, but the AB without any reasonable or probable cause refused to do so. D got issued a legal notice demanding the AB to place the minor child within ten (10) days from the date of receipt of legal notice. The AB tendered a reply notice wherein refused to place the custody of E into the hands D. As such I have approached court of law against the AB U/Sec. 10 and Sec. 25 of Guardians and Words Act-1890.
The AB appeared before the court and denied all the contents of my petition and more particularly alleged that “ the legal position laid down by all courts including the apex court that the principles in the relations to custody of the minor child are well settled in determining the questions as to whom should given priority who should be given custody, the paramount consideration is the welfare of the child and not rights of the parties under statue. That according to the ‘Guardianship’ under the Mohammadan law (Shariath) mothers mother is entitled custody in order to priority and therefore the B is entities to the custody of minor in question”.
But so far no such option or judgment is exists till to date! Is it so sir!
Thank you one and all!