Rakesh Sood
09 March 2016 at 11:09
I want to seek clarification as to if it is possible to mention the names of more than one beneficiaries in a will.
To clarify if the beneficiary mentioned in will is predeceased then the property will go to the second beneficiary.
Like if the property is to go to wife by will and she is predeceased then it will go to son.
please clarify
Thanks
Gowtham
08 March 2016 at 21:28
My father and we 3 children's have gone through a partition of my father's ancestral property in 2010. Me and my father retains the property and my 2 sisters took money instead and the same has been recorded in the deed. Now one of my sister is claiming the property . what is the limitations by law for such claims
Anonymous
08 March 2016 at 16:09
My father and we 3 children's have gone through a partition of my father's ancestral property in 2010. Me and my father retains the property and my 2 sisters took money instead and the same has been recorded in the deed. Now one of my sister is claiming the property . what is the limitations by law for such claims
1. I have to file evidence in NCDRC, I have already annexed original documents with the complaint, should I file only affidavit of evidence or should i file evidence affidavit as well as copies of documents.
2. what is the format of marking exhibits as in complaint I have mentioned documents as Annexure I...Annexure II etc.
3. Should i file joint affidavit if 2 complainants are there?
Dinesh
08 March 2016 at 13:26
My mother-in-law gave the land of 3 cents as a gift settlement deed, where my husband and I built a house by applying joint bank loan. My husband died in an accident after 2 years and the loan was cancelled with the help of insurance and the bank gave me the documents. My mother-in-law is staying in that house and I want to vacate her and sale the property. I applied in the court and it is still pending in the court. Will the judgment favor me. I have a male child of 5 years now and I am unable to meet his educational expenses with my salary
sivasreemannarayana
07 March 2016 at 16:06
Sir my site south boundary line municipal site some people occupied and construct kutcha houses one of the person construct pucca house (two stairs) without town planning permission they do erasement on my family so i decided to complaint Rti Act with help of third person but they are given about third person address and asking withdraw the Rti complaint , According to Rti Act not giving Applicant address but they are giving address. The municipal subordinates visited and corrupted for money After 25 days they are respond my Rti Act They told you do not written in your complaint (Rti Act) name of the house owner whom did construct pucca house. what can i do please tell me
thanking you sir
I attach my Rti application and respond letter in Telugu
niky......
06 March 2016 at 11:34
Hi All,
My(Defendant's) lawyer was asking questions to Plaintiff during first session of cross exam, but judge asked to go in sequence. But he didn't said if sequence should be by plaint or by evidence filed by plaintiff?
Which document should be considered for sequential cross exam?
Thank you.
anandakumar
05 March 2016 at 20:51
experts,pls clear my doubt.
is there a irrevocable power of attorney?
how and what clause to be inserted to write the irrevocability.?
is it possible to revock the irrevocable power of attorney?
he defendant died17/04/2015.but the plaintif taken steps on 24/12/2015. now they have filed condone delay (sec 5) for 92 days. set aside abatement petition and impleading petition. 90 days is period for taking steps. if not taken,then the suit is automatically abated. now condone the delay, has to be calculted form date of abatement or from the date of period of 60 days( after 90 days) given to set aside the abatement. how it should be calculated.what number of days has to be mentioned in sec 5 petition ?
Eligibility for govt schemes/jobs.
i am shahid and i have been selected for lpg distributor of hpcl but a criminal case that is immoral traffic act is on trial at me but in this the court did not charge framed or convicted me.
the company says that you are not eligible for this distributorship. but in the advertisement it was written that you should not ever been convicted or charge framed and i am not so how can they reject me unless i am not charge framed or convicted.
i want to know that am i eligible for it as by the law if yes what should i do
please help me.
thank you
sir
there is no judgement has been passed only the court taken this matter cognizance only