pratik
21 June 2010 at 14:24
Q. What is the difference between the follwing ?
A. Following are the terms used by lawyers and judges and police.
Setting aside- When a party gets aggrieved by any order of a lower court, a revision petition is filed to set aside that order.
Quashing- When a party is aggrieved by a judgment, an appeal is filed to quash the judgment.
Expunction -When a party is aggrieved by certain observations/findings and not necessarily the order/judgment, then the higher court is petitioned to expunge the portions objected.
Reconciliation -Forgive and forget. The difference is that in compromise there may be terms and conditions of settlement but in reconciliation no there are no terms and conditions.
Pls elaborate the abovementioned in more detail i would like to hae the learned members contribution in depth pls also would like to have the difference between quashing, compounding of offence & compounding, cognizance, to take the cognizance in depth. pls if possible witht the example.
Also Inside the Forum - Civil I have a written a para regarding the difference between law of resitution & law of compnestion pls read it & give comments on it in depth.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 13:42
sir,
,hw much salary of central govt employee can attach in case any attachmemt order from asst collector has been recd.in case of loan taken from co-operative society.is it posslble dat complete salary can be attached as per society rules?? plz let me know as early as possible.its urgent
mukesh jain
21 June 2010 at 13:26
I had lended about Rs.3.00 Lacs in cash to a person. Now he is not returning the money. I have a signed Hundi alongwith a cheque for repayment. Can I present cheque to bank, and in case the cheque dishonour file a civil case IPC 138/IPC 420 can be filed, please advice.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 12:58
Respected Experts,
Plz. Clarify the doubt and give a solution for the query.
A and B are contesting a landed litigation since 40 years. While things stands thus, both of them entered into a compromise and accordingly a decree has been taken in favour of “A”. To implement the said decree, "A" has approached the revisional authorites and when the matter was carried before the revisional courts, “B” also raising some technical disputes against “A” and wherein “A” has succeeded in all Revisional Authorities and also Single Judge of High Court. Again the matter was carried out by “B” upon the judgment of Single Judge.
While a Writ Appeal pending before the Division Bench of High Court, “C” entered into the picture and got purchased 3/4th of the lands by way of Registered Sale Deed and 1/4th of the lands by way of Registered Agreement of Sale cum GPA. I think that “C” entered into the said lands, knowing about the dispute and further “A” has succeeded in all lower courts and with a view to succeed before Division Bench also, since “A” has valid reasons to win the case.
Unfortunately the Division Bench has quashed all the orders below and that a SLP is filed and it is pending before the Apex Court. At this movement, “C” has the following doubts.
1. “C” wants to implead in this SLP as a party, as he was not impleaded earlier.
2. In case, if A colludes with B, what “C” should do?
3. Is there any possibility by A, to cancel the above two registered deeds, either today or tomorrow.
seema arora
21 June 2010 at 10:02
my father expired in 1995 leaving no will all immovable property title has is name am I entitled to ask court to change title to my name and other valid heirs if yes then how different is this process from partition suit
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 09:57
whether the information obtain the document is a public document or not and what are the decession on the aforesaid point.
varun gupta
21 June 2010 at 06:33
where should i find civil terms which is in urdu.urdu words are not so easy to crack in civil cases.so where should i know the meaning of the urdu terms.
pratik
21 June 2010 at 02:08
I think that experts can proved to a friend atleast the leow mentioned details.
1) Meaning of vindictive & punitive damages & there difference between.
2) Pls Pls Provided me with the case law on Randhir Singh Rana vs State (delhi Administration) 1997 - 001 - Supreme Court - 0278 - SC.(It is regarding cognizance of any offence.)
3) Explain me the difference between Cognizable & Cognizance. (any notes, examples, case laws.)
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Anonymous
20 June 2010 at 19:25
Sirs,
My appeal has been rejected by the Central Information Commission.Since there is no appeal as per the RTI Act, 2005,I am planning to move a writ petition in Delhi High Court against the said decision.
What would be the time limit for filing the writ petition ?
Thanks and Regards,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 22 of the transfer of porperty act.
22- Transfer to members of a class who attain a particular age.
Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created in favour of such members only of a class as shall attain a particular age, such interest does not vest in any member of the class who has not attained that age.
13- Transfer for benefit of unborn person.
Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of a person not in existence at the date of the transfer, subject to a prior interest created by the same transfer, the interest created for the benefit of such person shall not take effect, unless it extends to the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor in the property.
Query: As per Section 22 attain a particular age means (As per the Indian Majority Act where 18, or 22 should be considered for the interpretation of the section 22 of the transfer of poperty act, 1882.)
Pls explain the section 13 in detail with the help of a example(S)(S).
Thanks A Lot.