Dear Learned members, i need judgement for the following circumstances. My friend has given his laptop to the company for battery problem(it was under warranty). The company delayed the delivery almost 3months.My friend filed a case in consumer forum and in reply the company said that the laptop was lost by the courier company so it is not liable for the compansation as it was due to the act of third party. The computer company did not informed us about this before but after the institution of the case. So i need judgements for the following circumstance.
Regards
Md Shadab Ansari
INIYEN SENDIL.K
20 June 2010 at 09:51
DEAR EXPERTS,
(A)THE LAND LORD EXECUTES THE POWER OF ATTORNEY TO THE AGENT (B)AND(B)EXECUTES A REGISTERED SALE AGREEMENT WITH (c)THE PURCHASER.(A) CANCELED THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DEED WITH OUT COMMUNICATING B AND C.
SIRS I WANT RELATED CITATIONS FOR THE ABOVE CANCELLATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY BY (A) IS NULL AND VOID ,IT IS VERY URGENT.
salemtnin@yahoo.com
An arbitration award passed by the district court but later on challenged by one of the party to the award claiming false claims in addition to what is awarded in the award to that party. In order to avoid litigation & to buy peace of mind the other party entered into a compromise to settle the false claims and some amount is decided among the parties to be given to the party who had challenged the award. Now my question is whether this decided amount is the only amount to be given to that party i.e the amount of the false claims made or that amount to be given in addition to what is already awarded in the award.The statement in the Compromise deed goes like this:
"On the receipt of Rs549000 all the claims of Mr X (who had challenged the award)in respect of the movable & immovable estate of Mr.Y will be fully settled and nothing shall remain due after that."
The compromise is part & parcel to the arbitration award.
Pls answer that only these accepted false claims to be fulfilled or the thing already awarded in the award along with these false claims to be met.Because the property awarded to that party in the award has not yet transferred to that person's favour in the govt records.
Anonymous
20 June 2010 at 06:23
Whether application for leave to defend cum written statement can be filed prior to the service of summons for judgment. or the application should always be saperate as per the provision? give some citation on this point?
Anonymous
19 June 2010 at 23:45
Some one please cite me a ruling where a govt. servant was reinstated after suspension and was imposed only minor penalty after enquiries were conducted to impose major penalty, hence his suspension was treated unjustified.
There is an order to the effect from GOI that when after enquiries to impose major penalty ultimately ended with imposition of minor penalty the suspension should be treated wholly unjustified.
Anonymous
19 June 2010 at 23:26
Can any one tell me the remedies available to a tenant who has been living in a renten land for nearly 20 yrs by building own kacha house.There is no any deed as to the term and condition of the lease/tenancy and there is no any proof/receipt of the rent @ 300 per month till date paid as rent.Now the landlord has institued a suit for ejectment.
pratik
19 June 2010 at 20:01
if a driving lience obtain for the other state say as an example form u.p. can a person drive the motor vehicle in any other states in india. or vice - versa.
Thankin u all experts in advance.
pratik
19 June 2010 at 19:55
14. Currency of licences to drive motor vehicles.
(Provided that every driving licence shall, notwithstanding its expiry under this sub-section continue to be effective for a period of thirty days from such expiry.)
15. Renewal of driving licences.
(1) Any licensing authority may, on application made to it, renew a driving licence issued under the provisions of this Act with effect from the date of its expiry:
(Provided that in any case where the application for the renewal of a licence is made more than thirty days after the date of its expiry, the driving licence shall be renewed with effect from the date of its renewal:)
Query:
As per section 14 the section says that if the driving licence if get expiry than also it is valid till 30 days but section 15 says that if the driving licence in any case where the application for the renewal of a licence is made more than thirty days after the date of its expiry, the driving licence shall be renewed with effect from the date of its renewal:) so the period given under the section 14 of the said act that is 30 days & if the person is caught with the traffic cops in the road & the cops says the driving licence is expiried so we are laible for the offence. cant we says we get 30 days more after the expiry of the driving licence as per the act.
So if a person driving licence expiry on 31/1/2010 so as per section 14 he will get 30 days time more to drive with out the driving licence 1/3/2010 he renews is driving licence but between the time that is from feb to march if he or she is caught than he is without the lience or with the lience as per the section 15.
Pls correct & direct me if i am worng.
i think the lience is valid as per the section 14 which says (Provided that every driving licence shall, notwithstanding its expiry under this sub-section continue to be effective for a period of thirty days from such expiry.)
Because there he words notwithstanding & continue to be effective comes.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
pratik
19 June 2010 at 19:34
Pls tell me the types of cause or any books on clause eg: ouster clause, jursidication clause etc. which book should be refered for the contract act, 1872, motor vehicles act, 1988, negotiableinstrument act, 1881, Hindu minority & guradinship act, succession act, depository act, civil procedure code, criminal procedure code, payment of gratuituy act, wages act, factories act,1948. prevention of corruption act which gives detail knowledge with the case laws & most important is with the examples and with easy langugaes.
Pls tell me the books atleast. which should be prefer for the abovemntioned act.
thankin u all experts in advance.
LAND ACQUISITON FOR BUSTAND
SIR MY 22.40 ARES HAVE BEEN TAKEN OVER BY THE LOCAL BODY FOR A PRIVATE BUSTAND . NOTIFIED ON 6/6/2002 AND TAKEN OVER ON 30/08/2003 FOR Rs. 23472.40/ARE. ON 27/02/2009 THE SUB JUDGE ENHANCED THE COMPENSATION TO Rs.90850/ARE. BUT THE LOCAL BODY ASK TIME FOR CASH DEPOSIT AND NOW ON 16/06/2010 , THEY WENT TO THE KERALA HIGH COURT FOR STAY APPEAL(LAA). NOW THE BUSTAND IS PROPOSED TO BE INAUGURATED ON JULY 15, 2010. SHALL THERE ANY SCOPE FOR REJECTING THE APPEAL BY THE HC? PLEASE ADVICE ME.