Appointment of director od a medical institute.

This is a question regarding The Institute of Medical Sciences In Srinagar Kashmir..
A Doctor was appointed as an interim director of the institute after superseding 12 senior faculty members.
He had no Administrative experience and his bio data clearly mentioned it.
Others senior doctors had 3 to 5 years administrative experience but they were left out.
Before his appointment The High Court of J&K had mentioned in a judgement that a director below 50 years should be appointed as interim director but he was still appointed by the government.
His order was passed by the chief minister on Sunday.
He was appointed on as an interim director and as per High Court directions a very quick selection process for a Permanent Director was to be done but the person managed to get into the bureaucracy and delay the process of selection and its about 3 years now and there is no selection.
He is now retiring in April but with the help of The Chief Sectary of the state he is trying to get an extension for 2 years.
The Hospital has be totally destroyed in his tenure and corruption is everywhere. He cares for nothing and patients are suffering.

Can a PIL or any other writ be filed in the High Court to remove him and stop him from getting an extension.
Can an Interim Director of an institute be appointed without any time limit. He is there for more than 3 years now.
Can a doctor who is a junior with no administrative experience be appointed as Interim Directer leaving all the senior doctors with administrative experiences of 3 to 5 years.
Can he get an extension and selection process delayed.

what is value of Decree sheet

R/Experts
A civil suit for declaration was filed regarding some properties on the basis of will,and later on court decreed the suit in favour of plaintiff (Will holder)in 1985,this decree was never challenged nor it was registered in tehsil with registrar.What is value of this decree.Kindly advice.Is it mandatory to got register a decree with registrar etc.Thanx

Final decree proceedings

In final decree proceedings can sons of predeceased females be impleaded when in original suit the females were not parties and the said females died in the year 2003. What is the legal position in Karnataka State in aforesaid situation.

Final decree proceedings

Original suit for partition has been decreed in the year 2004. now the final decree proceeding is pending. In the decree has been passed allotting 1/4th share to the plaintiff. Now in FDP the sons of predeceased daughters (sisters of the plaintiff) have filed an application for implead them as parties and they are seeking 1/7th share each for their mothers who were died about 7-8 years earlier. The sister of the plaintiff have not been impleaded in the original suit. Can the impleading applicats are entitled to 1/7th share ? can they are necessary parties in the Final decree proceedings? This case is pending in Karnataka State.

REGARDING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LET OUT

I HAVE LET OUT A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IN TAMIL NADU FOR CORPORATE OFFICE PURPOSE.THE TENANT HAS VACATED THE LET OUT PROPERTY AND HE HAS RECEIVED THE ADVANCE GIVEN BY HIM AND HE HAS HANDED OVER THE KEYS OF THE LET OUT PROPERTY.WHILE VACATING HE HAS GIVEN A LETTER THAT THE FURNITURE IN THE LET OUT PROPERTY BELONGS TO MR X (WHO IS THE PREVIOUS TENANT) AND PLEASE NEGOTIATE WITH MR X FOR THE FURNITURE AND I HAVE ACCEPTED THIS BY A LETTER.I HAVE NEGOTIATED WITH MR X FOR THE FURNITURES AND THE NEGOTIATIONS FAILED DUE TO RATE DIFFERENCE AND HE ALSO REFUSES TO REMOVE THE FURNITURE FROM THE PREMISES.I AM UNABLE TO LET THE PROPERTY FOR RENT AT PRESENT.WHAT SHOULD BE DONE TO AVOID ANY LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN FUTURE.IF I LET OUT AS SUCH HE MAY FILE A CRIMINAL SUIT ON ME.I NEED AN ADVISE REGARDING THIS

STAY VACATING

TELEPHONE SERVICES AND CONSUMER FORUM

Apex Court in “General Manager, Telecom Vs. M.Krishnan & Another”, have ruled, that in view of Section 7-B of the Telegraph Act, the dispute relating to Telecom service should be decided only by the Arbitrator, appointed by the Central Government and that all services relating to telephone are subject to Telegraph Rule and therefore, this kind of cases cannot be decided by the Consumer Fora. The relevant observations in the judgement reads “In our opinion when there is a special remedy provided in Section 7-B of the Indian Telegraph Act regarding disputes in respect of telephone bills, then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred”.
By citing this citation the Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai has dismissed all pending appeal against the telephone service providers and on the basis of the said ruling the District Fora all over the Tamil Nadu has dismissed the complaints against telephone service providers and are not admitting new complaints. Is there any latest citation of the Supreme Court subsequent to the above said decision. Learned LCI members kindly express your views on the subject.

spesific performance

purchased house 1991 in agreement of sale position delivered from my paternal uncle
fr spesific performance as it is undivided hindu famly registration not took place and suit is dismissed now what is solution
dear sirs iam in the position morethan 12 years
no qstn arise 3yrs limitation now actually possessing
iam at hyderabad

contradict a plaintiff witness

the suit is for declaration that plaintiff is the sole owner of land.now the plaintiff witnesses are deposing before the court turn by turn.
myself being a defendant has possession of certain documents whic proves that i am also the owner of the proerty alongwith plaintiff.the document is will by which mutation has been sanctioned in my name also.
now my question is that how can i show the documents to witnessees of plaintiff.While showing the documents whether i can exihibit the same when plaintiff is deposing and i am asking certain questions about the documents which are in my possession.
another question is that when the document is a attested copy of revenue authories whether i have to call the revenue authorities for contradicting the statement of pw.

spesific performance

purchased house 1991 in agreement of sale
position delivered actually possessing as it is undivided hindu famly registration not took place and suit is dismissed now what is solution