Anonymous
15 March 2011 at 11:29
At what stages can a civil suit be withdrawn.??? What are the exact parameters for withdrawing of suit.??? can the court reject the permission for withdrawl of suit?? if yes how?? if no why??
AJAY PAREKH
15 March 2011 at 11:18
CAN THE GENERAL BODY IN THE SPECIAL GENERAL BODY MEETING PASS A RESOLUTION FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE COMITTEE AND CALL FOR FRESH ELECTION?
UNDER WHAT SECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT AND WHICH RULE OF THE BY LAWS PROVIDES FOR SUCH RESOLUTION?
Deep Bhatt
15 March 2011 at 10:27
Dear All,
As perr earlier querry, we have only written acceptence of our employee under which he states that some xyz forgery done & will be returned but not returned & we launched FIR under sectin 420,471,120B,467.
After year time while searching on net i found this forum for discussion.wll it be beneficial for our co or just a waist of time.
Anonymous
15 March 2011 at 05:52
Can a Public Limited Company force employees to resign by threatening to terminate ?
What recourse do employees have without having to get into the LONG legal process of filing civil suit against termination.
NEED A URGENT RESPONSE.
Anonymous
14 March 2011 at 20:10
SIR,
IN A CONTEMPT CASE THE ACP (TP) OF GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN HIS COUNTER AFFADAVIT HAS STATED THAT THE CORPORATION HAS STOPPED THE CONSTRUCTION ON 9TH FEB 2010 EVEN BEFORE THE HIGH COURT ORDERS PASSED ON 5TH MARCH 2010.
THIS IS FALSE AS THE CONSTRUCTION WAS CONTINUING WE REPORTED THE MATTER TO THE CORPORATION THROUGH MANY PHONE CALLS (ALL ARE RECORDED) AND THROUGH LETTERS DATED 17TH,18TH AND 19TH FEB 2O1O. DOES THIS ACTION OF ACP (TP) CAN BE TAKEN AS PERJURY. CAN THE RECORDED PHONE CALLS BE USED AS EVIDENCE APART FROM THE LETTERS.
IF THIS CAN BE BROUGHT UNDER THE PURVIEW OF PERJURY, WHEN SHOULD IT BE INFORMED TO THE COURT ie., AFTER THE MAIN CASE OR AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN DISPOSED.
Anonymous
14 March 2011 at 19:52
SIR,
I APPROACHED THE HIGH COURT OF AP REGARDING AN ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION, THE HONOURABLE COURT ISSUED A STAY OF CONSTRUCTION ON 5TH MARCH 2010. BUT AS THE CONSTRUCTION WAS CONTINUING EVEN AFTER THE STAY ORDERS I FILED A CONTEMPT CASE AGAINST THE PARTY WHO HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTING AND THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER AND ACP (TP) OF GREATER HYDERABAD MUNCIPAL CORPORATION FOR NOT STOPPING THE WORK.
ON 5TH JULY 2010 WHEN THE CONTEMPT OF COURT CAME UP FOR HEARING THE ACP (TP) IN HIS COUNTER AFFADAVIT HAS SUBMITTED IN THE COURT THAT THE UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION WILL BE DEMOLISHED IMMEDIEATELY.
BUT THAT WAS NOT DONE. WHEN I ASKED THE CORPORATION WHY THE DELAY THROUGH AN RTI, THE CORPORATION REPLIED THAT THE PARTY HAS TAKEN A STAUS QUO IN THE 3RD ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGES COURT, CITY CIVIL COURTS AGAINST THE GHMC ORDER OF REJECTING THE REGULARIZASTION PROPOSAL. AS THE STATUS QUO HAS BEEN STILL PENDING I ASKED MY LAWYERS TO MOVE A MOTION IN THE HIGH COURT REGARDING THIS.
BUT OUR LAWYERS ARE TELLING US AS THE JUDGE UNDER WHOSE JURISDICTION THE CONTEMPT CASE IS; IS NOW IN THE DIVISION BENCH AND HE IS HARDLY SITTING EVEN ONE DAY AS SINGLE JUDGE AND HENCE THE MOTION CANNOT BE MOVED AT THIS TIME.
I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF THERE IS ANY OTHER WAY TO MOVE THE MOTION
Anonymous
14 March 2011 at 19:49
SIR,
I APPROACHED THE HIGH COURT OF AP REGARDING AN ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION, THE HONOURABLE COURT ISSUED A STAY OF CONSTRUCTION ON 5TH MARCH 2010. BUT AS THE CONSTRUCTION WAS CONTINUING EVEN AFTER THE STAY ORDERS I FILED A CONTEMPT CASE AGAINST THE PARTY WHO HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTING AND THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER AND ACP (TP) OF GREATER HYDERABAD MUNCIPAL CORPORATION FOR NOT STOPPING THE WORK.
ON 5TH JULY 2010 WHEN THE CONTEMPT OF COURT CAME UP FOR HEARING THE ACP (TP) IN HIS COUNTER AFFADAVIT HAS SUBMITTED IN THE COURT THAT THE UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION WILL BE DEMOLISHED IMMEDIEATELY.
BUT THAT WAS NOT DONE. WHEN I ASKED THE CORPORATION WHY THE DELAY THROUGH AN RTI, THE CORPORATION REPLIED THAT THE PARTY HAS TAKEN A STAUS QUO IN THE 3RD ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGES COURT, CITY CIVIL COURTS AGAINST THE GHMC ORDER OF REJECTING THE REGULARIZASTION PROPOSAL. AS THE STATUS QUO HAS BEEN STILL PENDING I ASKED MY LAWYERS TO MOVE A MOTION IN THE HIGH COURT REGARDING THIS.
BUT OUR LAWYERS ARE TELLING US AS THE JUDGE UNDER WHOSE JURISDICTION THE CONTEMPT CASE IS; IS NOW IN THE DIVISION BENCH AND HE IS HARDLY SITTING EVEN ONE DAY AS SINGLE JUDGE AND HENCE THE MOTION CANNOT BE MOVED AT THIS TIME.
I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF THERE IS ANY OTHER WAY TO MOVE THE MOTION.
Anonymous
14 March 2011 at 19:26
A WRIT APPEAL FILED IN THE HIGH COURT BY ME DURING THE YEAR 2002 WAS DISMISSED BY A SINGLE JUDGE,BECAUSE MY LAWYER DID NOT FILE A REPLY TO THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT. THE RESONDENT HAD SUBMITTED ALL WRONG AND MISLEADING INFORMATIONS, AND THE HONBL.JUDGE HAD DELIVERED HIS JUDGEMENT BASED UPON THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT OF THE RESPONDENT BANK.
THIS CASE RELATES TO A DOUBLE PUNISHMENT IMPOSED UPON ME BY THE RESPONDENT BANK THE FIRST ORDER OF IMPLEMENTATION WAS CARRIED OUT IN FULL BOTH QUANTUM WISE AS WELL AS DURATION WISE.
THEREUPON, AFTER COMPLETION OF THE ENTIRE PUNISHMENT IN FULL,
ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION ORDER WAS ISSUED BY THE BANK STATING THAT THEY HAD MADE AN ERROR IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST ORDER, AND THAT THE SECOND IMPLEMENTATION IS ONLY A 'CORRECTION OF THE FIRST ORDER'
THE WRIT PETITION WAS DISMISSED ON 28/10/2010 , AND JUDGEMENT COPY WAS RECEIVED BY MY LAWYER ON 13/12/2010.
PLEASE INFORM ME, HOW TO FILE AN APPEAL AGAINST THE SINGLE BENCH JUDGEMENT AND VARIOUS FORMALITIES IN THIS REGARD.
THANK YOU SIRS
Arun Bhatia
14 March 2011 at 18:58
Can the Plaintiff pray for altogether a opposite relief in a different court in respect of a property when he has already prayed for some relief in respect of the same property in favour of Defendents in a earlier suit without withdrawing the earlier suit and also without disclosing the fact of earlier suit, thus resiling from the admission made in earlier suit.
Kindly support with case law
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
partition suit case law...
I have filed applicaiton under Order 7 rule 11 of the civil procedure code.... I have taken the ground that partition has already happened.. that to on a unregistered document in the year 1982... but the court cited me Karnataka High Court case law.. wherein it is mandatory for the partition document to be registered one.. which is the excat Honorable High Court case law in the year 2010????(pushpa v. datta then plz provide the complete citation) waitin for the reply with citation???
Please cite the case laws for supporting my contention as stated above..