Adv B.B.Gambhir #9814820602
21 July 2011 at 20:28
i had filed a suit for specific performance of contract for directing the defendant to register the sale deed and deliver the possession on the basis of agreement to sell. in the alternative i had claimed the relief of returning of earnest money alongwith 12% interest. the lower court has passed the decree in my favour qua the returning of earnest money i.e. rs. 400000/- along with interst @9% p.a. but before the decision of suit, the value of property has gone upto 75 lac. now if i wish to file the apeal against the order for not directing to register the sale deed because i do not want money back but i had claimed. will my appeal be considered or not the court may dismissed my appeal by saying that i had claimed alternative relief the same has been given to me. court had granted alternative relief on the plea that the opposite party had proved that there was no agrement only money transactions were taken place.
Anonymous
21 July 2011 at 20:25
can i evict a tenant from the property which i gave for conducting a business 38 years back?
Anonymous
21 July 2011 at 12:25
Dear Sir,
I have already requested to let me know the procedure in filing a case before the high court chennai, since no reply is received thru the forum once again I file this request to get a proper reply. I have filed a case before the CAT Chennai, and argued as party in person, and was dismissed again I filed a review petition which was also dismissed. Now I want to appeal before the Chennai High Court. Due to my financial problems I am not in a position to engage an advocate, so I want to appear as party-in-person before the HC. But without knowing the procedure as how to file the application, it will be much difficult to appeal. Hence I request any one can help me as how to file file the appeal against the CAT order before the Chennai High Court.
Mohamed Ibrahim
b roy chowdhury
21 July 2011 at 11:29
A member of the Society is encroaching a piece of land of the common passage of the Society.What action can asociety take
from stopping him.What are the other laws of land from stopping him?
Anonymous
21 July 2011 at 09:16
Dear Experts,
In the joint family father and son are partitioned the property in 6/6/2004 by registration deed in subregistar office. father is died in 2008. But they are not give property for daughter.Now the daughters wants to get share? They can approach the court what will the procedure(in this family two daughter and one son). They are from bangalore,karnataka
thanking u
satish
21 July 2011 at 08:37
Sir
My father registered a trust 2 years back. Now, I want to work on same Trust. But the title of trust is not much suitable to my objective.
Is it possible to amend the Name/Title of Trust registered in Haryana? If yes, what is the process?
Further, I want to know, to whom I have to submit accounts and other working in Hrayana as in case of society.
Please guide me.
Member (Account Deleted)
21 July 2011 at 03:03
Dear Friends / Experts,
A,an individual had insisted Tata Teleservices Ltd (TTL) to cancel his telephone connection on July, 2008.
A was promptly clearing the monthly bills.
Based on A's request, B of TTL called and persuaded A to accept for '3 years zero rental plan' by way of adjusting the rental deposit of Rs. 1000/- towards the instrument, as it became too old.
As A was not interested in the service of TTL, A did not make even single outgoing call using the telephone line since July, 2008.
Now, A has got a bill for Rs. 48/-, which is calculated on prorata basis for 6 days.
A has not been informed about the plan migration by TTL.
When A enquired, A has been informed that the 3 years zero rental plan shall by default change to One nation plan 180 after the completion of 3 years.
Query
Whether TTL is right and justified in not keeping A about the plan change ?
Ans :
Whether TTL is justified in not revealing the said fact on July, 2008 at the time of persuading for the '3 years zero rental plan'.
Ans :
Whether such concealment of fact by TTL shall be treated as FAIR TRADE PRACTICE.
Ans :
Whether A has got any merit or A's destiny is written by TTL on the subject matter.
Ans :
In case, A wants to contest TTL and not willing to pay any bill in future, what is the protection by law for A, when there is no use of phone line by A (the phone line is completely removed and it cannot even have incoming call).
Ans :
Whether TTL can use A's ignorance as strength and do any plan change as they may think fit.
Ans :
In fact, A used to give alms daily to beggars at least Rs. 3 to Rs.7. By doing so, A is getting satisfaction.
But, TTL's unfair billing without giving any information to A is very much disturbing A and A is not convinced to make payment for the current bill and any future bill.
Experts may guide to proceed on the matter.
Thanks.
Vishesh
20 July 2011 at 19:58
what is the remedy after rejection of application under order 9 rule 13
shashikant
20 July 2011 at 19:51
suppose a person book a flat in township in 2004 and the company refuses to allot from last 7 years. a company is coming up with initial public issue. what legel remedies he can avail under any law ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Validity of Breach of Contract
Ma Grand Father and his 3 brother made a contract in 1967 that if any of one will sell his property to any one outside from family he will deliver a notice to his brother first, but since in 1968 they breach this Contract and no one filled a suit in Civil court.
Later on in year 2005 when I was willing to sell my portion of property my cousin filled a Civil suit against me that our Grandfather had a contract like this..
Can you give me any Ruling that this type of Breach when it is proved that its broken since 1968 will not apply ..