ROHAN
29 September 2013 at 23:57
as per negotiable act u/s138
as defendant given security cheque of worth 2 lac
1. The cheque is issued as a security cheque.
2. The service/goods supplied by the person is not upto the mark.
3. If it is a finance cheque only point no.1 will prevail and not point 2.
4. There is a dispute on the ROI agreed and the amount calculated.
5. There is no invoice raised
in such case what remedy available for defendant
any landmark case
GANGO PADHYAYA
29 September 2013 at 21:04
SIR
MY MOTHER HAVING A PROPERTY : THE PROPERTY DEVELOPED FROM HER FAMILY SHARE LONG BACK : NEARLY 10 YEARS IT WAS KEPT ALONE:
UPON DAYS AND CULTURE CHANGE IT WAS ACQUIRED SOME BODY. BY WHOM EXACTLY NOT KNOWN : BUT AT ENTERING INTO PROPERTY / FOR MAJOR REPAIRS OBSTRUCTION OCCURRING.
CAN I GET RELIEF FROM HIGH COURT BY SHOWING PARTIES 1.) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 2.) MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER 3.) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE.
BY FILING OUR ORIGINAL TITLE DEED GETTING DIRECTION FROM COURT TO THE ABOVE PARTIES TO GET PROPER RELIEF TO LIVE OR SALE PROPERTY.
HERE IN OUR STATE THERE IS A STATE HESITATION GOING NO CIVIL COURTS ARE NOT WORKING
GANGO PADHYAYA
29 September 2013 at 21:01
SIR
MY MOTHER HAVING A PROPERTY : THE PROPERTY DEVELOPED FROM HER FAMILY SHARE LONG BACK : NEARLY 10 YEARS IT WAS KEPT ALONE:
UPON DAYS AND CULTURE CHANGE IT WAS ACQUIRED SOME BODY. BY WHOM EXACTLY NOT KNOWN : BUT AT ENTERING INTO PROPERTY / FOR MAJOR REPAIRS OBSTRUCTION OCCURRING.
CAN I GET RELIEF FROM HIGH COURT BY SHOWING PARTIES 1.) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 2.) MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER 3.) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE.
BY FILING OUR ORIGINAL TITLE DEED GETTING DIRECTION FROM COURT TO THE ABOVE PARTIES TO GET PROPER RELIEF TO LIVE OR SALE PROPERTY.
HERE IN OUR STATE THERE IS A STATE HESITATION GOING NO CIVIL COURTS ARE NOT WORKING
Harsh
29 September 2013 at 20:38
Dear sir,
One civil suit is filed against me of rs 10 lakh.During the cross examination of plaintiff my advocate asked the plaintiff to bring its balance sheet before the court. Balance sheet brought by him there was no name of mine in creditor list.
Pls provide me citation in which plaintiff has not shown debts in balance sheet civil case is liable to be dismissed.
Pls help me.I Would be highly thankful to you.
Member (Account Deleted)
29 September 2013 at 03:22
Respected Experts,
What is the legally valid procedure of disowning son or daughter
(1) from one's movable and immovable property and
( 2) to warn people against giving loan to them.
supratim sarkar
28 September 2013 at 22:30
Sir/Madam,
I was having a Fluton Personal loan which I had settled. But they forcefully entered my name in Civil, which I am unaware.I had paid 24 emi of 3705 and settled with 70 thousand rs.
I want to withdraw my name from civil file.
Please guide me what to do in an urgent basis.You suggestion and guidance is required.For that I am ready to pay the fraction amount.
Thanking You.
With Regards,
Supratim Sarkar.
N.Damodaram Naidu
28 September 2013 at 21:50
Dear sirs,
I have given a guarantee to a friend for a chit along with two other persons one among them is a poor employee and another one is a rich business man and a close relative to the borrower. Now the borrower became defaulter and the chit company filed a suit for recovery for chit amount. Among the three guarantors I and another employee are unable to pay. Can the chit company claim entire the suit amount from a rich guarantor? Can two of us get exemption form that suit claim? please suggest.
Anjali Arya
28 September 2013 at 16:10
The Execution Court has passed order to issue the Warrant for Possession for delivery of Suit Property to us. (Copy of the same is yet to be received)
1. What Steps and precautions shall we take after this ?
2. Shall we wait for any revision petition is filed by JD in High Court ?
MSC Shekar
28 September 2013 at 15:58
A Govt Dept in response to a RTI Aplication did not submit information, A 2nd appeal was filed with the Information Commission. The Infomration Commission took up the appeal and allowed the appeal.
At this juncture the said Govt Dept. submitted false information as per an unofficial record?
The Applicant was not satisfied with the info given and made a complaint in writing to Information Commission. The complaint of the Applicant was forwarded to the said Govt Dept. by the information commission
In response to this the Govt. Dept. replied to the Information Commission that the said unofficial record is the only record and is correct.
Not satisfied with this, The applicant filed a Suit for Injunction in a Civil Court against the said Govt. Dept.
To the utter surprise, it was found that the information is false and the record from which they have furnished is unofficial and Actual official record exists. The said case is in progress.
All this has resulted in wasting four years of time, money for legal purposes, advocate fees etc.
Now my query is can we file claim against information commission for not guaranteeing information under RTI Act?
Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Urgent: chit funds
Hello Experts,
I have been struggling to get the answer for this in Chit Funds Act.. Please help me..
As per Sec 21(1)(e) of the Chit Funds Act, "A foreman shall be entitled to demand sufficient security from the prized subscriber for the due payment of the future subscriptions payable by him"
If I provide another unprized chit as security for getting the prize money, In the preview of Sec 21(1)(b) of the referred, does the foreman have any right to deduct commission on such unprized chit before considering as security..
In other words, The word 'Sufficient Security' as referred in Sec 21(1)(e) of the Chit Funds Act include/provide any right to foreman to get security towards his commission too, in way of deducting it from the security provided..?
I am here with quoting the relevant Sections of the Act:
Sec 21(1)(b): "to such amount not exceeding five per cent of the chit amount as may be fixed in the chit agreement, by way of commission, remuneration or for meeting the expenses of running the chit;"
Sec 21(1)(e): "to demand sufficient security from and prized subscriber for the due payment of future subscriptions payable by him"
Sec 31: "Every prized subscriber shall, if he has not offered to deduct the amount of all future subscription from the prize amount due to him, furnish and a foreman shall take, sufficient security for the due payment of all future subscriptions"
Thanks in Advance...