rajan
13 February 2010 at 11:51
My name in all educational certificates are given as " SUNDARARAJAN G".
In my PAN card it is shown as ; "SUNDARA GURU RAJAN"
FIRST NAME : SUNDARA
MIDDLE NAME : GURU
LAST NAME : RAJAN
will it cause any problem in name mismatch?
k.k.jandial
12 February 2010 at 21:12
sirs,
Can some one give me the contact details of Advocates practising at chandigarh in conumer laws and RTI act and oblidge.
Thanking you.
K.K.Jandial
Anonymous
12 February 2010 at 13:56
sir, MY FRIEND PURCHASED ONE PROPERITY FOR 50 LAKHS FROM DRT ON AUCTION AND IT WAS DULY REGISTERED BY DRT,IN THE YEAR 2003.BUT WHEN WE APPROACHED FOR POSSESSION SOMEBODY IS THERE AS TENANT AND REFUSED TO DELIVER THE PROPERITY.SO GOING ROUND THE DRT COURT CIVIL COURT ND ALSO HIGH COURT AT LAST IN THEYEAR HE COULD GET TO HIS POSSESSION IN THE YEAR 2009. SO FOR SIX YEARS HE LSOT RENT OR INTEREST AGONY EXPENESES ETC FOR 6 YRS SO NOW WHAT TO DO GET DAMAGES.PL ADVISE
Anonymous
11 February 2010 at 23:38
The Vana Pradesh is one of the States in India. Since last six months a regional agitation is going on for separate Statehood in this State. On January 25th 2008, the state police entered into a residential area of Haritha Nagar, in the capital city of the State suspecting some agitators are taking shelter in that locality. The police manhandled the residents of this colony and also opened fire. Due to this firing, several persons were injured and five persons were killed on the spot. The said incident was published in the local and national news papers and also covered by the electronic media.
“The Society for Citizen Rights”, a Registered Society striving for human rights, filed one PIL- (Public Interest Litigation) in the High Court of Vana Pradesh contending that the action of the police is violation of human rights and Art 21. of the Constitution of India. The State contended that the PIL is not maintainable as the Petitioner Society is having private interest. It is further contended by the State that the said Police are personally liable for their misdeeds and the State is not liable since the State never authorized the police to do so. But, the High court rejecting the contentions of the State, allowed this PIL and held that the action of the police is clear violation of the Art. 21 of the Constitution of India and thereby awarded the compensation of Rupees Two lakhs to each injured person and Rupees Ten Lakhs to the families of each killed person in the firing.
Aggrieved by the said ruling of the High Court, the State preferred SLP (Special Leave Petition) in the Honorable Supreme Court of India by contending that there is no violation of Art. 21 of the Constitution of India and the State is not liable for the misdeeds of the police. The Supreme Court granted the Leave and posted the matter for final hearing and framed the following issues:
1. Whether the PIL is maintainable or not?
2. Whether there is violation of Art.21 of the Constitution of India or not?
3. Whether the State of Vana Pradesh is liable to pay the compensation to the Victims or Not?
4. Whether the compensation directed by the High Court is excessive or not?
I humbly request you to mention the Arguments from each side.
1.If Appointed as Advocate on behalf of State.
2.If Appointed as Advocate on behalf of “The Society for Citizen Rights”
Anonymous
11 February 2010 at 21:22
a person is staying outside India. The complainant has a copy of the pass port. The allegation of the complainant is that the accused has intentional taken exparte decree of divorce when he was living in India and at present he has gone on employment to Malasia. I want to know how can I summon him the complainant does not know his address at Malasia.
Shasankha
11 February 2010 at 09:05
HI,
I am shasankha das citizen of bangladeshi
Thanks
Shasankha
Praveen Kanungo
10 February 2010 at 19:57
We had applied for the registration of a firm with the name "Om Vigilance Security". There is no other firm existing with the same name. Our application has been rejected by saying that the word "vigilance" is prohibited under the act. We asked them to state the reasons in written. They only stated that the name is not acceptable, in writing without stating the reasons therefor. Now we want to make an appeal against the action of the sub-registrar. What is the procedure?
If there is any other way out, please guide us.
Arati Gawde
09 February 2010 at 23:01
How Advocate qualify for Notary ? Is there any exam we need to give ?
Niyamat Hussain
09 February 2010 at 19:53
I am fresher advocate but i dont no law abut Insurance law matter is,
A insurance com. name Is Tathagat insurance pvt, Ltd. in this com. my fathar is an agent worker he open a new acc. an other person policy, after few years the com closed all policy is stay. some person claim against MD of insurance com. after this a policy holder complaint in police chouki agains my father police called my father said to my father give him money, but some policy instollment deposit by father he give huim all slip, pls give me good solution
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Date of birth Differs
In case date of birth in birth certificate is different compared to the SSC/HSC certificate, which is considered as final?
In my case, my original d.o.b is 14-12-1985 which is there in my birth certificate. But in my school certificate my parents registered it as 14-07-1985.