Anonymous
21 August 2010 at 00:15
can somebody tell me when is CJ(JD) vacancies apprehended in Rajasthan?
Anonymous
20 August 2010 at 22:36
A society regd. under society reg.act,1860 in Delhi bye-laws of society do not disclose the manner and procedure of election of its governing body but president and gen.secy. of the same society and an other regd. society, without authority of its governing bodies appoint four returning officers cum observers therafter,they alongwith fourR\O CUM OBSERVERS decide to conduct the elections of both governing bodies that too allotting elections synmbol"JEEP'to one of group contesting elections and "CUP-PLATE' to other group for which only five persons of each society are representing to each group on single ballot papers and twoR\O CUM OBSERVERS out of four openly supported one group and issued appeals in their favour circulated handbills with their photographes and got the result of elections for both the societies to whom they are favouring. A suit for declaring result of said elections are chalenged among others on the ground of rigging in elections but trial court decline to grant temporary injuction and stated in its order the case is to be decided on merits. In nutshell,without going into merits refused to grant the temporary injuction.On the basis\strength of that order banker of both the societies allowed allegdlly winning group to operate the saving accounts of both the societes though ,in the same suit allegdlly winning group\defendants also file an applicaton u\o 39 r 1&2 for taking and handig over the charge of both societis and seeking directions for banker to allow them for operation of saving accounts(The fact of filling this application did not disclose the banker though banker was informed by the other group)In the mean time, two other R\O cum observers also in their written statement affirmed the facts of grievances of petitioner and suggesteted that "RE-ELECTIONS" should be held.Keeping in view of change in circumstances a fresh application u\o39 r 1&2 filled by petiioner the trial court re-affirmed its previous order and again disallow the petioner's application therafter allegedlly winning defendants lawyer on next date says their application u\o39 r 1&2 become infroctuous statement of lawyer is recorded and issues are framed now next date of hearing is 14\12\2010. please advise.You are further requested to provide any case law, if any on resembling facts of the case.
vinod bansal
20 August 2010 at 22:09
R/Experts
I am practising in Jind Haryana.In distt. consumer forum there is a practice that forum fee is only accepted through bank challian at the time of filing consumer commplaint.Payment of fee through bank challan results in bulk of problems as there is always rush at bank counter.I want to know is there any rule or it is mandatory in which payment of forum fee is only acceptable through bank challan .Kindly suggest me real position in given situation as we are (Lawyers brothers)are in a great problem due to above statred problem.Thankyou very much
RAMESH
20 August 2010 at 21:04
if any registration is required for hindu religious charitable trust as per the ap hindu religious endowment act 1987.if so please mail a copy of registration format & details.
Anonymous
20 August 2010 at 17:52
respected sirs. After recent ammendments {in feb 2009} now what is the procedure of oppointment of notery?. whether anybody oppointed recently?. govt formed any commettee in this regard?. please advise me sir to how to be made application. thanking u sir
Anonymous
20 August 2010 at 17:41
what kind of matters or cases cums under gaon sahaba panchayat in delhi & it is governed by which act
SUBHASH SHARMA
20 August 2010 at 15:23
WHAT IS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIRCULAR AND NOTIFICATION.
Anonymous
20 August 2010 at 11:13
our customers had filed a case in conumer fourm for non performance of our product and asked for the replacement of the product and compensation for mental agony and loss due to non performance of the machin,
our lawyer could not understadn the technicality of our product and therefore could not defend properly.As a result, conumer forum order us to repair the machine and hand over the same to the complainant.
We did repaire the machine and given the proof to the consumer fourm ,such as parts replaced and work carried out etc.
court ordered that the complainanat should be informed of the repairs cariied out and tell them to take the delivery.
we did the same by registered post.But the cosumers did not come to see the repaired machine and informed to the court that the machine is not repaired.And asked to issue arrest warrant against us and refund th full value of the machine.
we asked out lawyer to file a declaration in the fouram that we have complied with the order ,and finished the work and we shoudl be extorned from the liability.
our lawyer has not done that .
now what we can do
can anybody please advice?
thanks
M/s. Y-not legal services
19 August 2010 at 17:48
Under this act, Can anybody claim the seized propery from the govt's custody? Please give me any citation friends. If its high court or supreme court judgement mean its wil be very help ful.. Thanks in advance.. By ..tom..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
credit card
Sir got a credit and I have gone settlement for the payment issues.I have got 6 installment in cheque to the amount within the periods of 6 months. but i Have payed in 12 installment monthly by cash with the period of 12 months + before the settlement they got 750 Rs. but now they asking me go for another settlement because "the settlement you have taken before is null and void" or you arrested for cheque bounce case under 138 act what can i do for that
help me