Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   10 February 2011 at 15:04

Query about Govt. House

What is the rule or Act, through which Govt. release their house after employee's retirement.

A govt. person retired from their job but they can't release the govt. house, through which law how we release the house.

Anonymous   10 February 2011 at 14:29

Query About Welfare fund

Plz provide me the Address and Contact Person name, Phone no. and mailid of Uttar Pradesh Advoacte Welafre Fund,Lucknow.

I have submitted my Welfare Fund form before 2 months but I can't receive the papers till now.

S.Pradeep   10 February 2011 at 14:23

defeciency in service

hai,
i had deposited some of my monies in a financial concern.
they are refusing to repay the monies to me.
can i approach the consumer forum for the defeciency of services provided by them.
please help me.

NOTTAM VENKATASAMY   10 February 2011 at 13:54

RTI ACT

WHETHER THE R T I ACT IS APPLICABLE FOR PRIVATE CONCERN?

Sanjeev Thakur   10 February 2011 at 11:16

Abbreviations of law journals and reporters

Kindly let me know the full form of following abbreviations used for law journals and reporters.

SRJ
VAD(Del)
BHCRO
AIR(T&C)
AIR(VB)
AIR(VP)
KHCACJ
OELT
OCPJ

Anonymous   09 February 2011 at 23:20

Unpaid personal loan abroad

Hi this is for an aquaintance. He was working abroad and had taken a personal loan there. Since he subsequently lost his job and was sent back, the loan he had taken has not been repaid. Now the bank has traced his address in India and contacted him through a recovery agency. He is willing to co-operate but at the moment has no money to repay as he is still jobless. What are the various legal options before him? What actions can be taken by the bank? Expecting an early reply. Thank you very much in advance.

Member (Account Deleted)   09 February 2011 at 23:16

OBJECTION OF EXPERTS FOR APPEARANCE IN PERSON BY PARTY

A QUERY WAS POSTED BY POOJA DHIMAN ON THIS SITE UNDER THE HEADING

"sincere efforts by experts for a querist and abuse by other"

AT THE END OF THE DISCUSSION MR. ARUN BHAGAT, WHO I PRESUME, MAY BE A LAWYER, HAS PLACED A COMMENT THAT,

" You showed your sense by personally appearing in Court byepassing Learned Advocates and losing the case. Only the Advocates are called with prefix "Learned" thereafter the judges. SO Advocates are learned not you."

I HAVE VERY STRONG OBJECTION TO THAT,AS LAW NOWHERE RESTRICTS A CITIZEN OF INDIA FROM APPEARING IN PERSON BEFORE COURTS OF LAW AND EACH & EVERY PERSON IS FREE TO LITIGATE IN PERSON.

MOREOVER THIS PROFESSION IS NOT A KIND OF MEDICAL FIELD, WHERE ONLY AN EXPERT DOCTOR CAN OPERATE A PATIENT AND IF A PERSON UNDERSTANDS THE NICETIES OF LAW AND IS COMPETENT TO EXPRESS HIS VIEWS EVEN ON THE PAPER, HE CAN FIGHT FOR HIS RIGHT IN PERSON AS DONE BY BHAGAT SINGH BEFORE THE BRITISH COURT, WHOSE PROCEDURES WE ARE COPYING TODAY ALSO AND TODAY AS DONE BY POOJA DHIMAN ALSO.BOTH LOST THEIR CASES BY THE SAME "CAUSE".WHAT BRITISH DID AT THAT TIME, THE SAME IS DONE BY INDIAN JUDICIARY IN HER CASE NOW.

MERELY LOSING A CASE IS NOT A CONSEQUENCE OF APPEARING IN PERSON.

DOES ENGAGEMENT OF A LAWYER GUARANTEES A CASE TO BE WON?

DO EVERY ADVOCATE WIN HIS CASE?

ONE WINS AND OTHER LOSES.

THEN HOW CAN MR. BHAGAT BLAME MS. POOJA FOR LOSING HER CASE DUE TO HER APPEARANCE IN PERSON?

FURTHER,
"LEARNED" IS NOT A TITLE CONFINED ONLY TO ADVOCATES BUT EVERY PERSON WHO IS EXPERT IN HIS FIELD MAY BE CALLED LEARNED (IN URDU LEARNED MEANS 'FAZIL' WHICH MEANS Talented Expert Intelligent Wise)

MR. BHAGAT IS WRONG AND HIMSELF PROVED THAT HE IS NOWHERE LEARNED.

SITE ADMINISTRATOR MUST TAKE COGNIZANCE OF SUCH OTIOSE DISCUSSIONS ON THIS SITE.

ravi anu ramraika   09 February 2011 at 20:04

suchana ka adhikar, appeal main jurmane ka jikra nahi

bank main suchana ke adhikar ke antargat aavedan diya,jiska javab 11 din late mila, santosh janak na hone par bank ki main branch mumbai ke appeal suchana adhikari ko appeal ki, jismain appeal ke binduo ke alava 11 din ka vilamb sulk 500 rs. daily ke hisab se 5500 ki mang ki gayi. appeal adhikari ne to meri mangi jankari to binduvat uplabdh kara di, kintu penalty vali bat gol kar gaye,kahi bhi is sandarbh main jikra tak nahi kiya, main kya karu....

Anonymous   09 February 2011 at 19:01

ULIP Policy - Notification F.No.IRDA/Reg/2/52/2010 dtd. 1.7.2010

This notification of IRDA regarding treatment of discontinued ULIP Policy dtd. 1.7.2010, my query is that this notification is applicable to all ULIP policy in force at the time of notification date ?
If not any other notification in this regard prior to this notification ?

Kindly advise and suggested