Anonymous
30 July 2025 at 21:00
I own a commercial property in my town. Between road and my property there is a property of my brother which is measuring 7 sq yds. If I have to enter my shop, I have to walk through the above 7 sq. yds. site. They are threataning the person who is my tenant. Will I get easement right? If I am granted an onkection, what will be the next step? I was told that the court will appoint a person and I neef to show him the property to him amd convince him. Please let me know what will happen after an injection was granted.
Anonymous
30 July 2025 at 19:23
Hi Kindly Guide -
A promoter sold Institutional land under Residential plot scheme. Now development authority declined its land conversion as per High Court orders. So, Kindly guide -
1) Can a case be filed in RERA. As land is institutional but sold as Residential Plot. if Yes - Under which Section of RERA
2) Can this Institutional Land be registered in RERA under which section of RERA. As it is sold as plotting to buyers.
3) Are Institutional Land liable to register in RERA, if yes .. Why and under which section of RERA.
4) Can this be termed as unfair trade practice in RERA and under which section.
Anonymous
27 July 2025 at 23:24
Maharashtra govt has issued new GR on 15/5/25 for Sindhi displaced persons having lease hold plots in any where in Maharashtra, As per new GR all Sindhi camp plots are to be converted to freehold after paying some amount
My application is in process, Report has been sent by Dy superintendent Land records office to SDO office, and SDO office has sent report to Dy collector , now Dy collector will issue challan for conversion fee and then issue order for conversion to free hold
My question is that , since land records office and SDO both have sent favourable reports , then Can Dy collector/Collector can disapprove it? Or he will approve it, every thing is ok, no breach of contract of lease
Akshat
26 July 2025 at 22:45
I own a builder floor in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, which consists of six separate flats that are all leased out to tenants.
The entire building is currently serviced by a single main electricity connection from MPEB. For fair billing, I use individual sub-meters. However, the total consumption of all flats often pushes the main meter into the highest tariff slab, which significantly increases the per-unit cost for my tenants, as they do not get the benefit of lower initial slabs. Each family consumes between 160 to 250 unit maximum. Main meter goes 1000-1330 units.
I believe the most equitable solution is to install six separate domestic connections as it appears to lower the slab rates and fixed charged, one for each flat. I am seeking to understand my precise legal standing under the current regulations. We asked someone who said that only one "electricity connection will be provided which will be in name of property owner said no multiple Connections". NOTE: OUR WIRING FOR EACH FLAT IS SEPARATE
I have reviewed the **Compendium of M.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2021 (Version 2.5)**. My point of confusion is how the rules apply to a single owner of a multi-unit building with tenants, as the code often refers to terms like "Cooperative Group Housing Society."
My interpretation of the code suggests that:
Clause 4.18** may define each of my leased flats as a "separate premise".
Clause 4.84** seems to grant the right to demand a direct supply for a "leased" unit.
I would be grateful for your expert opinion on the following:
1. Under the current MPERC Supply Code, am I, as the sole owner of a multi-unit building with leased flats, eligible to apply for and obtain separate domestic meters for each flat?
2. Is my interpretation of the applicability of Clauses 4.18 and 4.84 correct in this context?
3. What would be the recommended formal procedure to follow to maximize the chances of a successful application with MPEB?
THIS IS LINK TO DOCUMENT https://mperc.in/uploads/editor/Comependium/MP%20Electricity%20Supply%20Code-Compendium-v-2-5.pdf
Please feel free to mention anything that I missed
Thank you
Anonymous
15 July 2025 at 15:34
Dear sir,
My father purchased flat in 1988 and done agreement for sale. He died in 2006, the share certificate and society membership is given to my mother with court heirship certificate.My mother nominated me
with 100% share in nomination forms and submitted it to society.She died in 2024,now I submitted nomination form with application and requested society to transfer my name in the share certificate and give me the society membership.This procedure is going on.
This year Society is willing to redevelop the building and requested all society members to submit chain of agreements.Now my question is which documents I need to submit to the society because I have only one agreement for sale which is done between my father and builder in 1988.
Waiting for an early reply.
Thanks you
Basant Aggrawal
09 July 2025 at 08:19
Hello respected members,
I need legal guidance regarding the ownership of a HUDA plot in a partnership firm case. Here are the details:
In 1990, a partnership firm named M/s Radheshyam Aggrawal Chemicals was formed with four partners:
Deenchand Aggrawal, Basant Aggrawal, Rajesh Gupta, and Manish Jain.
In 1992, a HUDA industrial plot was purchased in the name of the partnership firm.
In 1997, three partners—Deenchand, Rajesh, and Manish—retired from the firm by signing a dissolution deed, leaving only Basant Aggrawal as the continuing partner.
One important clause in the dissolution deed said:
"Sh. Basant Aggrawal shall have the right to carry on the business of the firm under the same name M/s Radheshyam Aggrawal Chemicals singly or with new partners. The retiring partners shall have no right or claim in the assets, goodwill, or property of the firm and shall not use the firm’s name."
After this, for 3 months, Sh. Basant Aggrawal continued the business alone under the same firm name.
Then, in mid-1997, he brought in two new partners, Sh. Jille Singh and Sh. Ajay Singh, through a new partnership deed. The firm continued in the same name and address, but there was no mention of the HUDA plot being transferred or pooled into this new partnership.
Later the same year, Basant Aggrawal retired from the firm by signing a retirement deed, and the business continued in the same name with Jille Singh and Ajay Singh as partners. In this manner, the constitution of the partnership firm was changed. Again, the retirement deed did not mention the HUDA plot or any asset transfer.
No NOC or transfer permission was ever obtained from HUDA during this entire transition.
Also, the plot is still registered in the name of the original firm as per HUDA records.
My Question:
Given these facts, who is the rightful owner of the HUDA plot?
Is it Basant Aggrawal, who was the sole surviving partner after the dissolution, and never officially transferred the property?
Or is it the reconstituted partnership firm with Jille Singh and Ajay Singh?
What legal view would HUDA or a civil court take in such a situation?
Anonymous
07 July 2025 at 21:30
Dear sir
My dad was single owner of flat. He did nomination in my mom name when he was alive.
Then society transferred flat in my mother's name after my dad expired.
Me and my sister is there.
Now what are the options available with my mom If she wants to pass on that flat to me and my sister. Also advise any other option.
Regards
Anonymous
06 July 2025 at 12:16
Dear exports ,
Builder has given creche to soceity but we wanted to know Can we lease out the soceity creche on rent to generate some income for betterment of soceity as per maharashtra Co-operative soceity act 1960.
Praveen Kumar
05 July 2025 at 11:24
Dear Sir, I am a resident and flat owner at Rishi Apartment, located in Baddi, Himachal Pradesh. I wish to bring to your attention serious concerns regarding the maintenance and functioning of our housing society, which is currently under the control of the builder. The builder has failed to provide basic facilities such as proper security, regular cleaning, and general upkeep of common areas. Due to these persistent issues, the flat owners collectively formed a Flat Owners Association (currently unregistered) to address grievances and represent our interests. On behalf of all residents, the association has been regularly communicating with the builder via email, requesting improvement in services. However, instead of addressing these genuine concerns, the builder recently issued a notice increasing the maintenance charges, despite the quality of services being extremely poor. As per the maintenance agreement, charges may be increased only once every two years, and by a maximum of 10%. However, the builder has imposed an increase that exceeds this limit, without consultation and without any corresponding improvement in services.In response to this arbitrary action, the flat owners have collectively decided to Withhold payment of the maintenance charges Until improvement of services .Despite multiple reminders, the builder has not responded to our communications. Furthermore, the builder is not registered under HPRERA .We now seek your kind guidance on the following: 1. Is it legally justified for flat owners to withhold payment of maintenance charges under these circumstances? 2. What legal recourse or action can we take against the builder for poor maintenance and arbitrary increase in charges? 3. Where can we file a formal complaint, given the builder is not registered under HPRERA? We look forward to your support and direction in resolving this issue lawfully and fairly. Reply Follow
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Easement right
I own a commercial property in my town. Between road and my property there is a vacant land of my brother which is measuring 7 sq yds. If I have to enter my shop, I have to walk through the above 7 sq. yds. site. They are threataning the person who is my tenant. Will I get easement right? If I am granted an injunction, what will be the next step? I was told that the court will appoint a person and I need to show the property to him amd convince him. Please let me know what will happen after an injunction was granted.