Tom
07 September 2016 at 01:05
Dear Experts,Self & Wife are purchasing a Flat as co-owners with equal share and as co-borrowers of bank loan. Should there be any specific wordings in the sale deed which will ensure Joint Tenancy and Survivorship for us with out any doubts ? Or simply mentioning our names as buyer 1. and buyer 2. is good enough ?
D.Karmakar
07 September 2016 at 00:09
Message :
Sir, My fathers are three brothers my father is 2nd one and younger one both live in JAMSHEDPUR (jharkhand) where as elder brother is dead his only son(50 YRS) is alive and stays in MURSHIDABAD(WEST BENGAL) They had 30 BIGHAS of LAND in the name of my GRAND FATHER in MURSHIDABAD (WB) Now, The son (nephew of my father) of elder brother sold 60 % of land without informing other two UNCLES, by Utilising FALSE "POWER OF ATTORNEY" of his uncles's. Now, what steps should my father take? If file a case how long it will take time for Ultimate judgement? and what will be OUTCOME of case(approx) And most important can my father file case in MIDNAPUR COURT(WB)as he is Old enough it will be problem for him to attend murshidabad court frequently. PLEASE advice me as early as possible Thanks
sajeedrshaikh1
06 September 2016 at 17:27
Hi,
Our family owns a land of 6.5 acres at our home town. There are 3 siblings among whom this land is to be distributed by their Father(who is no more).
However, the eldest son has sale-deed 2 acres of land from the father 18 years before. So, we have a total of 4.5 acres of land left.The eldest son who has already sale-deed 2acres of land have equal shares in remaining 4.5 acres of land as per Muslim law.He is ready to give half of his share( in remaining 4.5 acre) to one brother but not to give another brother.
My query is it possible to transfer his Half of the share on only one brother name?
Mayank
06 September 2016 at 13:53
The subject property is re alloted to Gaurav and Ashish divided into half(both son of Jagmohan), then Aashish did GPA in name of his brother Gaurav. The details before this reallotment are fine and unobjectionable.
But the conveyance deed says in favour of "Gaurav Jain s/o Jagmohan (GPA of Ashish)". So as of my observation/knowledge, I think it must also contain the name of Gaurav as Self also(as Gaurav also owns half of the property).
This property came to us for Mortgage purpose and is authority property.
Please help.
jaguar.theimmortal
05 September 2016 at 10:22
Can someone please help me to know if service tax and VAT is applicable if I buy a ready possession/RTM flat.
I want to know the rule as far as Maharashtra State is considered.
If your answer is yes then please can you please tell me the govt rule number or any Mumbai High Court Ruling under which I am not liable to pay the same.
As I have already bought a ready possession flat from the builder in 2012. Then I came to know from surrounding people in March 2015 that I should have not paid the same when I bought the flat.
Now for the refund of Service Tax and VAT I am fighting my own case in Consumer Court Forum. And for that they need the ruling evidence in order to go ahead.
Would be really thankful to you in providing either the court case number or govt's ruling number.
sanjay hariram MASAND
05 September 2016 at 10:18
my father applied in 1950 4 acre land on lease to govt means collector.because the owner of the land is govt.collector sent it to higher authority for sanction.higher aut hority also sanction the land on leased.but lease is not issued in my father's name.we possess 1 acre.another land is vacant and no one possess it.in the eyes of people my father is owner of that land.3 acre land is vacant and there is no development on that land.b a person demanded some part of that vacant land on lease to collector .whether collector can issue lease in favour of another person about vacant land?i also breach some conditions mentioned in the official letter available between the two officers not to me.
rajesh agarwal
05 September 2016 at 08:36
Sir
I am owner of the second floor in a builder made building of three floor. On the net the building has been booked by mcd in 2002 with details on net as for construction of mtnl tower in the roof of third floor. Now please say me that the only third floor will be booked or the whole building will be booked.
Its urgent.
Thanks
Gourang M Haldipur
04 September 2016 at 13:04
A sole plaintiff filed FDP against 15 of his family members (defendants) seeking to partition his share in the undivided family dwelling house. During the pendency of the FDP, the sole plaintiff and 9 out of the 15 defendants, without the permission of the trial court, sold their undivided shares to a stranger. The sale of the undivided shares was also not brought to the notice of the trial court by the sole plaintiff & 9 defendants. The remaining 6 defendants were not aware of the sale transactions.The stranger,who has admitted in his affidavit in support of his I.A.for impleadment that he is aware that the property is the subject matter of the FDP, after sitting quiet for 3 years, thereafter applied to the trial court seeking to be impleaded as plaintiff no:2, which was rejected on the ground that it is barred by Section 52 of T.P.Act. On appeal,the high court,in its wisdom permitted the stranger to be impleaded as defendant no:16 and NOT as plaintiff. Accordingly, the stranger is impleaded as defendant no:16 in the FDP. The FDP is still pending and shares of the coparceners is yet to be decided and the shares of the coparceners is yet to be divided by metes and bounds.In the light of the above, the following questions arise:-
1) Whether the FDP is maintainable in view of the fact that the sole plaintiff and 9 defendants have sold their undivided shares in the undivided family dwelling house to a stranger.?
2) If the FDP is not maintainable, can the remaining coparceners file an I.A. on maintainability before the trial court.?
2) Whether the stranger-defendant no:16 can enforce his rights in the present FDP to get the undivided shares that he has purchased from the sole plaintiff and 9 defendants demarcated against the remaining 6 defendants who have not sold their undivided shares in the family dwelling house.?
3) What is the remedy available to the remaining 6 defendants to save the undivided dwelling house from the stranger.?
Sir-Request you to kindly send me your valuable guidance and opinion on the above points. thank you very much.
Ajay Shukla
04 September 2016 at 04:08
A man who is the sole earner becomes a member of a housing society. The society allots him a house. The man pays the society by taking loan in his own name and then pays the entire loan amount from his salary by installments.
Although the society has allotted the house only in his name, the man gets the house registered jointly with his wife as co-owner.
The man writes a will regarding disposal of the property after his death.
Q-
Is such a will still valid now that wife as the co-owner is the survivor?
Can the wife later dispose the property according to her wishes by altering the will of the deceased husband?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Land accuisaton
Dear Sir,
I have a land at Mangalore NH66 n a part has been accuired by NHAI,
The Govt rate per Cents is 1,00,000/- n they r paying me according to the Govt rate.
Is the New Law not applicable to me where the new rate is 1:4 for rural area
Secondly i want to know if i can take TR from NHAI instead of the Money
PLS HELP ME
Thanks in Advance
B.rgds/Saleem