Yashvant Bhardwaj
13 August 2025 at 02:07
I want to file an appeal in Specific Reliefs Act, 1963, section 26 for rectification of my sale deed. There are two mistakes. First, is in the flat number of my flat. This was clearly a mutual mistake since the draft of sale deed was prepared by the vendor but I failed to notice the mistake while signing the deed. Both parties signed the deed. Flat no. was clearly mentioned in the allotment letter. The second mistake is in the name of the vendor's authorised representative who came to execute the sale deed. The board of resolution correctly mentions his name but in the sale deed his name's spelling is wrong. I had asked them a couple times before execution of the sale deed to show me the board of resolution but they did not. Later on while inspecting the register of the sub registrar at the time of obtaining the certified copy I noticed his aadhar card had a different spelling of his name. This was clearly a suppression of facts. In my opinion this is a case of fraud. Now, the first mistake is due to mutual mistake and the second mistake is due to fraud. What should I allege in my overall appeal, fraud or mutual mistake. Can I allege mutual mistake for first mistake and fraud for the second in the same appeal.
Also, I bought the flat jointly with my Uncle's son Paramjeet Bhardwaj who currently is residing abroad and cannot come to attend the case on every date. The description of Purchasers in the sale deed is written in the following way: "Yashwant Bhardwaj jointly with Paramjeet Bhardwaj hereinafter referred to as the Purchaser(s)". This means there is a joint liability imposed which is different from joint and several liability. Does the "jointly with" clause mean that both of us would have to appear on each date, or can I appear alone on each date and Paramjeet need not come.
Anonymous
30 July 2025 at 21:04
I own a commercial property in my town. Between road and my property there is a vacant land of my brother which is measuring 7 sq yds. If I have to enter my shop, I have to walk through the above 7 sq. yds. site. They are threataning the person who is my tenant. Will I get easement right? If I am granted an injunction, what will be the next step? I was told that the court will appoint a person and I need to show the property to him amd convince him. Please let me know what will happen after an injunction was granted.
Anonymous
30 July 2025 at 21:00
I own a commercial property in my town. Between road and my property there is a property of my brother which is measuring 7 sq yds. If I have to enter my shop, I have to walk through the above 7 sq. yds. site. They are threataning the person who is my tenant. Will I get easement right? If I am granted an onkection, what will be the next step? I was told that the court will appoint a person and I neef to show him the property to him amd convince him. Please let me know what will happen after an injection was granted.
Anonymous
30 July 2025 at 19:23
Hi Kindly Guide -
A promoter sold Institutional land under Residential plot scheme. Now development authority declined its land conversion as per High Court orders. So, Kindly guide -
1) Can a case be filed in RERA. As land is institutional but sold as Residential Plot. if Yes - Under which Section of RERA
2) Can this Institutional Land be registered in RERA under which section of RERA. As it is sold as plotting to buyers.
3) Are Institutional Land liable to register in RERA, if yes .. Why and under which section of RERA.
4) Can this be termed as unfair trade practice in RERA and under which section.
Anonymous
27 July 2025 at 23:24
Maharashtra govt has issued new GR on 15/5/25 for Sindhi displaced persons having lease hold plots in any where in Maharashtra, As per new GR all Sindhi camp plots are to be converted to freehold after paying some amount
My application is in process, Report has been sent by Dy superintendent Land records office to SDO office, and SDO office has sent report to Dy collector , now Dy collector will issue challan for conversion fee and then issue order for conversion to free hold
My question is that , since land records office and SDO both have sent favourable reports , then Can Dy collector/Collector can disapprove it? Or he will approve it, every thing is ok, no breach of contract of lease
Akshat
26 July 2025 at 22:45
I own a builder floor in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, which consists of six separate flats that are all leased out to tenants.
The entire building is currently serviced by a single main electricity connection from MPEB. For fair billing, I use individual sub-meters. However, the total consumption of all flats often pushes the main meter into the highest tariff slab, which significantly increases the per-unit cost for my tenants, as they do not get the benefit of lower initial slabs. Each family consumes between 160 to 250 unit maximum. Main meter goes 1000-1330 units.
I believe the most equitable solution is to install six separate domestic connections as it appears to lower the slab rates and fixed charged, one for each flat. I am seeking to understand my precise legal standing under the current regulations. We asked someone who said that only one "electricity connection will be provided which will be in name of property owner said no multiple Connections". NOTE: OUR WIRING FOR EACH FLAT IS SEPARATE
I have reviewed the **Compendium of M.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2021 (Version 2.5)**. My point of confusion is how the rules apply to a single owner of a multi-unit building with tenants, as the code often refers to terms like "Cooperative Group Housing Society."
My interpretation of the code suggests that:
Clause 4.18** may define each of my leased flats as a "separate premise".
Clause 4.84** seems to grant the right to demand a direct supply for a "leased" unit.
I would be grateful for your expert opinion on the following:
1. Under the current MPERC Supply Code, am I, as the sole owner of a multi-unit building with leased flats, eligible to apply for and obtain separate domestic meters for each flat?
2. Is my interpretation of the applicability of Clauses 4.18 and 4.84 correct in this context?
3. What would be the recommended formal procedure to follow to maximize the chances of a successful application with MPEB?
THIS IS LINK TO DOCUMENT https://mperc.in/uploads/editor/Comependium/MP%20Electricity%20Supply%20Code-Compendium-v-2-5.pdf
Please feel free to mention anything that I missed
Thank you
Anonymous
15 July 2025 at 15:34
Dear sir,
My father purchased flat in 1988 and done agreement for sale. He died in 2006, the share certificate and society membership is given to my mother with court heirship certificate.My mother nominated me
with 100% share in nomination forms and submitted it to society.She died in 2024,now I submitted nomination form with application and requested society to transfer my name in the share certificate and give me the society membership.This procedure is going on.
This year Society is willing to redevelop the building and requested all society members to submit chain of agreements.Now my question is which documents I need to submit to the society because I have only one agreement for sale which is done between my father and builder in 1988.
Waiting for an early reply.
Thanks you
Basant Aggrawal
09 July 2025 at 08:19
Hello respected members,
I need legal guidance regarding the ownership of a HUDA plot in a partnership firm case. Here are the details:
In 1990, a partnership firm named M/s Radheshyam Aggrawal Chemicals was formed with four partners:
Deenchand Aggrawal, Basant Aggrawal, Rajesh Gupta, and Manish Jain.
In 1992, a HUDA industrial plot was purchased in the name of the partnership firm.
In 1997, three partners—Deenchand, Rajesh, and Manish—retired from the firm by signing a dissolution deed, leaving only Basant Aggrawal as the continuing partner.
One important clause in the dissolution deed said:
"Sh. Basant Aggrawal shall have the right to carry on the business of the firm under the same name M/s Radheshyam Aggrawal Chemicals singly or with new partners. The retiring partners shall have no right or claim in the assets, goodwill, or property of the firm and shall not use the firm’s name."
After this, for 3 months, Sh. Basant Aggrawal continued the business alone under the same firm name.
Then, in mid-1997, he brought in two new partners, Sh. Jille Singh and Sh. Ajay Singh, through a new partnership deed. The firm continued in the same name and address, but there was no mention of the HUDA plot being transferred or pooled into this new partnership.
Later the same year, Basant Aggrawal retired from the firm by signing a retirement deed, and the business continued in the same name with Jille Singh and Ajay Singh as partners. In this manner, the constitution of the partnership firm was changed. Again, the retirement deed did not mention the HUDA plot or any asset transfer.
No NOC or transfer permission was ever obtained from HUDA during this entire transition.
Also, the plot is still registered in the name of the original firm as per HUDA records.
My Question:
Given these facts, who is the rightful owner of the HUDA plot?
Is it Basant Aggrawal, who was the sole surviving partner after the dissolution, and never officially transferred the property?
Or is it the reconstituted partnership firm with Jille Singh and Ajay Singh?
What legal view would HUDA or a civil court take in such a situation?
Anonymous
07 July 2025 at 21:30
Dear sir
My dad was single owner of flat. He did nomination in my mom name when he was alive.
Then society transferred flat in my mother's name after my dad expired.
Me and my sister is there.
Now what are the options available with my mom If she wants to pass on that flat to me and my sister. Also advise any other option.
Regards
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Building regularization
Dear experts,
We live in kdmc vicinity, our building is not authorized. There is disputes amongst developer and owner of the land. Our building has not received oc and cc. But our land is conveyanced. Court has ordered to demolish the building. We challenged the court order.
We decided to regularize our building.But builder is not cooperating. He has used FSI more than approved. Hence we have to bear those charges which could run into crores. But builder is not giving any money. It is clear breach of agreement.
So we filed case in court and register case in police station. Whats other legal option we have so that we can make him pay