Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 13:02
I live with my mother in an ownership flat in Mumbai which is solely in her name. I am a nominee. She is keen to add my wife and my name to the share certificate during her lifetime. What is the procedure?
Also, is it true that I would have to pay stamp duty if my mother were to transfer the flat in our names during her lifetime?
Thank you
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 12:13
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
Ram
03 November 2009 at 12:12
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
Ram
03 November 2009 at 12:11
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
Ram
03 November 2009 at 12:10
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
suraj guha thakurta
03 November 2009 at 11:24
sir, is it possible to make a gift with a condition, i.e. the donee can't sale it in future? if not then how i can restrain the donee from sale...
Prathamesh
03 November 2009 at 10:25
Hello,
In September 2009 i did a apartment booking in Alibaug by paying a token amount of Rs. 51,000/- (by cheque). However later when the time came for getting the property registered the clauses in the agreement where not acceptable to us as the same where in favor of the builder/developer. Hence we decided to exit from the project and requested for the refund of 51000/-. However the developer says the token will not be refunded as the receipt for 51k has a clause about the same. Does the law permit the developer to forfeit the booking amount by just placing a clause in the receipt? Please could you advise what course of action can I take for getting the refund? Also do let me know if any additional information is required.
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 01:01
Dear sirs,
it is to draw your kind attention toward my query that a person died leaving a registered will,as in that will he has given the whole share to his two sons and exluding her three daughters,
Now my point is that is there is way for daughters to get equal share from their father's property.
kishor
02 November 2009 at 23:27
Namskar
I have purchased a Flat at Ghatkopar.hingwala lane Pantnagar.east.mum 400075. This society was redevelop.Devlopers M/S Bhavanji Khimji & Co.Who repaird (devlop)up to 4th Floor and Constructed three floors (5th to 7th). Developer has given possession on 01.06.2008 to new members (from 5th to 7th floors)
.
Last Two years Society was not Given Share Certificate on Flat holder Name.
New Flat Holders paying maintenance charges Rs1000/-Per months & society is not giving any Receipt against payment.
We requested society number of times, but society is not giving receipt and also not giving us membership of society & share certificate.
There is the dispute between Developer & Managing Committee. My neighbor is an old age family. They are suffering Water supply & Lift problem. Also new members on 5th to 7th floor.
Society always demand to bring O.C (occupation certificate) from Developers and Developers demands us to the issuance of O.C. is kept pending for the concernend members are required to remove the grills, projections and window on dead walls. There is no delay or lapse on our part and for violation of rule and consequent delay the society has to think its members.
Some new members paid maintenance. Every month. Other new members not paid maintenance because he want receipts. Societies say you are not members and staying illegally.
Developers said to new flat holder if society gives to u membership I will give transfer fee to society.
Now Mahanagar gas lying gas pipe lines in society but society given NOC upto 4th floor for old members for gas connection. New members also demanding gas pipeline, but society say New members are staying illegally.
So kindly guide us this matter. And solved our new members problem.
Thanking you
Yours Faithfully,
New member.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
chellinging a registered will
Dear sirs,
My query is this that a person died leaving 2 sons and 3 daughters.as his will is registered but the language of will is not correct,as there is a lot of mistakes in drafting that will.
my querey is this that if language is not corret then it will be beneficial for the daughters to get share for the said property if the property is self aquired.