CA DINESH KUMAR OSTWAL
12 January 2009 at 17:06
A tenant is lessee of land and owner of structure over the land. Landlord terminated tenancy of structure only. whether the termination of tenancy is legal ?
aj
12 January 2009 at 16:20
I WAS DRIVING SANTRO AND MET WITH ACCIDENT WITH A MOTORCYCLE AT T POINT WHILE TAKING RIGHT TURN.I TOOK HIM TO NEARBY HOSPITAL.POLICE WAS CALLED BY SOMEONE AND MLC WAS DONE SHOWING 3 FRACTURES.AN FIR WAS LODGED.VICTIM CLAIMS HE WOULD GET WITNESSES AND TROUBLE ME IN COURT.I HAVE VALID DRIVING LICENSE AND MY CAR IS PROPERLY INSURED.
1.HOW WILL LAW TAKE ITS COURSE AND HOW SHOULD I REACT?
2.WILL 2 CASES OF COMPENSATION AND CRIMINALIS LIKELY TOBE FILED?INSURANCE TAKES CARE OF COMPENSATION BUT DO I NEED TO APPEAR MYSELF AND APPOINT LAWYER.?WHAT IS LIKELY IN CRIMINAL CASE?
URGENT
Shilpa Rani
12 January 2009 at 16:14
If anyone who is jobless and living with money from his parents...will he also need to file taxes...i mean the person without income for the whole year coz of health reasons he did not work...does he need to pay income tax for that year..
Shilpa Rani
12 January 2009 at 16:11
I have sold my share of grand father porperty (agricultural land)and got my share of money and deposited in bank ( Fixed deposit)...my questions are:
1. since it is my grand father property inherited to me ...will it attract capital gain tax...if so how much?
2.how to avoid paying capital gain tax on this amount...i mean how to invest this money so that i will attract less tax payment...
Aparna
12 January 2009 at 15:51
Hi All,
can you help me frame the verbiage for the non-competing clause of the terms and conditions to be written in the offer letter.
this is urgent.
thank you in advance.
Regards
Aparna
Chandan Garg
12 January 2009 at 15:30
I have filed a case against one person under 138 NI act for bouncing of cheque..
i also filed one affidavit along with the complaint case and notice was issued..
there after 3 attempts the warrants were issued but not served .. in the mean time some higher people came in between and the dispute resolved...
now i want to with draw the case .. kindly tell whether the presence of another person is neccasary ( in my case the accused is out of country and cant come..) , or there is no need for his presence ... tell me the way of finishing the complaint case
advocate satya
12 January 2009 at 13:30
sir
recently women organisation is sending letter to chief minister, and commissioner of police to impose ban on black flim on car glass, the question is
do this will reduce the rape cases in car?
do this mean that right of privacy is not at all there as if we are going in a car with transparant glass with ladies do the anti social elements not use to follow the car as they take glimpse of who is sitting inside?
do this mean many rape cases if happening in houses all the houses shall be made of glass?
i think cars are a private place of individuals and right of privacy should be there , if law requires decrease in number of cases of rape happening in cars the cars with black films can be checked and this is the duty of police dept, imposing a ban on black films is not the solution as this will effect the privacy of common man.
pls share your thoughts on this issue?
Associate R
12 January 2009 at 11:22
Dear Experts,
I wish to apply for the JMFC Exam through MPSC. Is there any study materials or books for the JMFC exam. Please guide me how to go about.
Thanks in advance.
sushil tagaliya
12 January 2009 at 10:10
Dear Sir,
I want to know my share in the property hireted from my father (Ancesteral Property) where i and three of my brother and one sister is the share holder in it
my father did not make any will whether i have 1/5 share or 6/25 share
Member Strength 9,49,327 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Liability on partly paid up shares already forfeited under British Comapnies Act
One of my client is holding partly paid up shares of a company incorporated in England.The articles of association of the company provides that a shareholder holding partly paid up share shall be liable to the extent of amount remaining unpaid even after the shares have been forfeited by the company due to non payment of call money.Shares in the question have been forfeited by the company due to non payment of call money.
My question is
whether the articles can insist upon the payment even after forfeiture ?
& if yes,whether after payment of full money the shares so forfeited become the property of the original share holder.