Anil
13 September 2008 at 18:57
Bonus/ Incentive is paid to employees on yearly basis in a private company.
Regarding this I would like to know:
1)Due to increase in total remuneration in the month in which bonus/incentive is paid, the Profession Tax rate changes(the employees go to next higher slab).
a)Does one has to pay higher profession tax only during that month?
b)If one takes the stand that bonus/incentive so paid has to be spread over the entire year he/she faces following problem.
Bonus / incentive amount is known only at the end of the year. Due to this if a persons PT slab changes after spreading over the year, does one has to file revised returns for the earlier months during which higher PT was not deducted? and does one also has to pay penalty for short deduction during those months.
2) Should one consider bonus/incentive for profession tax purpose on accrual basis or payment basis.
Kindly quote section/rule wherever possible.
Please answer questionwise.
Thank you.
rajendra
13 September 2008 at 16:36
what is the bonus rule applicable to the pvt. ltd. company?
Can the company denies bonus to the certain employees/manager?
what is the remedies, if company not paying bonus to some of the employees?
Satish
13 September 2008 at 15:56
Kindly let me know the name & address of Legal Consultant who can help/guide me for procuring a "Licence for Pvt. Security Agency" In Mumbai(Maharashtra)
advocate satya
13 September 2008 at 15:55
it is heard in challan cases of traffic magistrate that some cases are contest case and some are non contest cases , can anyone provide a list of contest and non contest matters in motor vehicle cases.
govind
13 September 2008 at 14:23
whether cooperative banks can acquire the debts from other commercial banks and can proceed fOR recovery under the RDDBFI ACT 1963 AND SARFAESI act 2002
rajendra
13 September 2008 at 14:09
CAN U give the citation details, in whcih married daughet can claim the partition after 1990 in maharashtra
N.K.Assumi
13 September 2008 at 13:53
Accused went to petrol pump station and asked the man to fill the petrol. The man filled the petrol and after that the accused went away with his car without payment.Will it be a case of thief?
salilkumarp
13 September 2008 at 13:22
ACCUSED WAS A LADY AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS CHARGED U/S 381 IPC.SHE WAS FOUND GUILTY AND A REPORT OF THE PROBATION OFFICER WAS CALLED FOR. PROBATION OFFICER GAVE REPORT STATING THE PATHETIC CONDITION OF THE ACCUSED, IN ALL RESPECTS ,AND PLEADED FOR COURT"S MERCY. BUT THE COURT OVERRIDED THE REPORT AND SENTENCED THE LADY TO 3 YEARS RI.
WHETHER THE SENTENCE LEGAL ?
WHAT IS HER REMEDY AT APPELLATE STAGE ?
N.K.Assumi
13 September 2008 at 13:10
What are the distinctions between section 43 and 66 of the Indian Information and Technology act of 2000.
Member Strength 9,46,539 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 negotiable instruments act
whether source of income is relevant in 138 NI act ?
whether it is the burden of complainant to prove that he had sufficient income to lend to the accused ?
any rulings in this respect ?