Mutation cancellation at adm revenue court

dinesh kumar (Querist) 29 March 2020 This query is : Resolved
RESPECTED SIR,
MY PURCHASED LAND HAS ALREADY MUTATED ON 06/04/2019 & I HAVE GOT THE LAND POSSESSION CERTIFICATE WITH MAPI REPORT DONE BY C.O OFFICE. IN THE COURSE OF TIME ,I HAVE ALSO BEEN ABLE TO GET THE CERTIFICATE FROM REGISTRAR FOR NOT ISSUING THE MENTION FAKE DEED BY HIS END ALONG WITH TREASURY OFFICER REPORT THAT THE SAID FAKE DEED STAMP PAPER HAS SOLD ON 16/07/2017 TO STAMP VENDER & THAT STAMP VENDER HAS SOLD IT ON 29/01/2018 WHEREAS THE SHOWING CERTIFIED FAKE DEED DATE IS 29/01/2008.NOW OPPONENT HAS ABLE TO TO CONVINCE THE ADM REVENUE OR ABLE TO GET THEIR SUPPORT BY GIVING HIM BRIBE FOR PASS THE ORDER AGAINST ME.NOW THE ADM HAS TOLD ME THAT YOUR LAND IS NOT IN SEQUENCE BY KHATIYAN. PROVE ALL THE TRANSACTION FROM KHATIYAN. HOW IT COMES FROM KHATIYAN TO YOU.I AVE PURCHASED THE LAND TO SEE THE MUTATION 7 POSSESSION ON LAND ONLY DUE TO LAKE OF KNOWLEDGE. I AM NOT ABLE TO PROVE THE SEQUENCE DUE TO A VERY LONG PERIOD HAS GONE.LAST KHATIYAN PUBLISHED YEAR WAS 1909.PAST DEED HAS ONLY MENTION THAT THE LAND IS PATERNAL PROPERTY( MAURUSHI) BUT MUTATION WAS GOING ON SINCE ITS INCEPTION BUT MUTATION RECORD IN ANCHAL OFFICE IS NOT AVAILABLE . PL. SUGGEST WHAT I HAVE TO DO IN PRESENT SITUATION. CASE IS ON ORDER.BUT ORDER HAS NOT PASSED AS YET. A OLD MUTATION OF LAST 35 YEARS CAN BE CHALLENGED OR CANCELLED BY ADM ON THE GROUND OF NOT MAINTAIN THE SEQUENCE OF LAND BY KHATIYAN ??????

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

A landowner is seeking advice after their land mutation, completed in 2019, is being challenged at the ADM Revenue Court. The opponent claims the land sequence isn't traceable from the old 1909 Khathiyan records. The landowner, lacking knowledge at the time of purchase, is struggling to prove the transaction history due to the age of the records and missing mutation details. Experts advise waiting for the ADM's order and then filing an appeal if necessary, suggesting that a 35-year-old mutation isn't automatically valid and that lodging an FIR might be an option if fake documents are involved.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 29 March 2020
The trial of your case has already ended and the case is now fixed for the order/judgment which is to be passed by the Civil Judge so you have nothing to do but to wait for the judgment. Once it is pronounced, seriously go through it with the help of your lawyer and then only raise any relevant query, if desired.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 29 March 2020
A mutation as long as it may be, got set aside if the circumstances do warrant. The entry of the mutation about 35 years in the revenue record is not a solid ground to retain the same. Let the judgment be pronounced.

P. Venu (Expert) 30 March 2020
Facts, as posted, lacks clarity as well as transparency, esp. as to the fake deed that is mentioned. Please post simple facts.

SHIRISH PAWAR, 7738990900 (Expert) 30 March 2020
Dear querist,

35 years old mutation entry can be challenged before revenue court. Go through the judgment and challenge it in appeal. As per me you have a good case. Appoint expert lawyer to fight out the case.

Regads,

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 30 March 2020
Wait for the orders. If the orders are not in your favor, go for appeal.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 30 March 2020
For fake deed, lodge FIR.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 30 March 2020
You have been advised properly by all experts.
Hence as advised you may wait for the judgment and then prefer an appeal against the judgment if the judgment is against your interests and it has aggrieved you.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 30 March 2020
FIR is not understood as advised by one of the experts. It may be got explained.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 01 April 2020
If the opponents have relied on false / fabricated documents, FIR can be lodged against them in such case.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries