Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Queries Participated

Amaresh Patel   29 November 2016 at 19:51

Delegation of power to issue Rule-14 charge sheet

My disciplinary authority who is not my appointing authority is competent to impose minor penalty. Is he competent to issue Rule-14 charge sheet?

Amaresh Patel   31 January 2016 at 23:11

Genuineness of an email

Is an order without any signature of the authority genuine if not followed by a hard copy?

Amaresh Patel   31 January 2016 at 20:58

Special leave for submission of defence statement

Am I eligible for getting special leave for submission of my defence statement /brief in rule 14 enquiry. If yes whom to write the application IO/LEAVE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY

Amaresh Patel   20 December 2013 at 10:40

Chargesheet vide rule-14 of ccs(cca) 1965

DEAR SIR

IT IS A PUBLIC OFFICE AND IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC DURING THE PEAK RUSH TIME OF THE MONTH ONE SUPERVISOR DID NOT RELIEVE HIS SUBORDINATE THOUGH THE SUBORDINATE HAD BEEN GRANTED EARNED LEAVE WITH OFFICE ARRANGEMENT. PRIOR TO GRANT OF THE LEAVE THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY HAD BEEN REQUESTED TO DEPUTE ONE HAND ON DEPUTATION TOE MANAGE THE OFFICE WORK. DESPITE THAT THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY GRANTED THE LEAVE ON OFFICE ARRANGEMENT AND WITHOUT CALLING FOR ANY EXPLANATION SUSPENDED THE SUPERVISOR VIDE RULE 10 OF CCS(CCA) RULES 1965.

IS IT LEGAL ?

2. DURING THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION THE SAID SUPERVISOR WAS CALLED FOR AN EXPLANATION WHY DIDN'T HE RELIEVE THE SUBORDINATE OFFICIAL IN REPLY OF WHICH THE SUPERVISOR WROTE LIKE THIS "The official could not be relieved due to accute shortage of hand at the peak time of business of the month, though he had been granted 6 days EL for his brother’s marriage. " AFTER RECEIVING THE AFORESAID EXPLANATION HE WAS REVOKED vide clause(C) of sub-rule(5) of Rule 10 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965" . BUT IN WHICH GROUND HE WAS REINSTATED WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THAT MEMO.

QUERY : IN WHICH CASES ONE IS REVOKED ?

3. AFTER 9 MONTHS OF ISSUING ORDER OF SUSPENSION THE SUPERVISOR WAS CHARGESHEETED IN RULE-14 VIDE MISCONDUCT OF NOT CARRYING OUT THE ORDER.

QUERY : AFTER THE REVOCATION IS IT REQUIRED TO BEGIN RULE-14 ENQUIRY ?

4. IN REPLY OF THE CHARGESHEET THE SUPERVISOR REQUESTED TO SUPPLY THE COPIES OF LIST OF DOCUMENTS AND STATEMENT OF WITNESSES TO SUBMIT HIS DEFENCE STATEMENT BUT THE DISC. AUTHORITY DENIED THE SAME AND WROTE THAT THE SAME WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF ENQUIRY. AGAIN THE SUPERVISOR WROTE LIKE THIS : "WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS AND STATEMENT OF WITNESSES HE IS UNABLE WHETHER HE ADMITS OR DENIES THE CHARGES AND HE IS ENTITLED TO GET THE SAME AT THAT STAGE"

QUERY : IS HE ENTITLED ACTUALLY TO RECEIVE THE AFORESAID DOCUMENTS AT THIS STAGE ?

5. AFTER A MONTH PASSED THE DISC. AUTHORITY HAS NEITHER SUPPLIED THE DOCUMENTS NOR STARTED THE ENQUIRY ?

QUERY : IS THERE ANY TIME LIMIT TO START THE ENQUIRY ?

WHAT OTHER STEPS HAS THE SUPERVISOR TO TAKE FOR HIS WELFARE ?

Amaresh Patel   09 December 2013 at 10:23

Non-consideration of application for a post advertised in web-site

Respected Sir,
I am a Postal employee working since 15 years in Department of Posts. I had applied for the post of Technical Supervisor (CEPT Mysore) on 01.10.13 duly filled up in the prescribed application form published vide Department of Posts web site(indiapost.gov.in) dated 30.09.13 through proper channel which was received by my immediate higher authority, i.e. o/o the SSPOs, Sundargarh Division on 03.10.13. As a matter of regret my application was returned by the o/o the SSPOs, Sundargarh Division on 05.12.13 with the remarks “no information has been received from the Dept. of Post regarding recruitment of Technical Supervisor (CEPT Mysore)” inspite of my intimation of the publicity of the deputation in indiapost.gov.in website in my application itself which was received back by me on 07.12.13 during the office hours.
As per the advertisement my application had to be arrived to the Dy Director General(Technology), Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg, N Delhi-100001 within 15 days of date of advertisement through proper channel only and if received directly then the application will not be entertained. For kind information no hard copy of the advertisement has been received from our Department by my office. I applied vide our departmental web site www.indiapost.gov.in.
Now I am unable to apply again for the same as the date has already been crossed.

A copy of my application for the Post on 01.10.13
I hereby apply for the post of Technical Suprevisor(CEPT Mysore) duly filled up in the prescribed application format in Annexure-B published in the Department of Posts web site (indiapost.gov.in) dated 30.09.13 for kind consideration of my eligibility for the said post.
A copy of the SSPOs letter dtd 05.12.13
It is to intimate that no information has been received from the Depat. Of Post regarding recruitment of Technical Supervisor (CEPT Mysore). Hence the application can not be forwarded to DDG(Technology) and returned herewith.

So, it is requested kindly to convey me if I can apply for a Post published through the website and request to give me advice for getting natural justice for the same.
With regards.
Amaresh Patel

Amaresh Patel   05 November 2013 at 17:44

Defence statement in rule14

Dear Sir,

I am a central government employee working in the department of Posts, India.
I was made over the suspension order after working hours on 31.01.13 by my disciplinary authority which is not the appointing authority of my present post with the subject :-
A disciplinary proceeding against -- - is contemplated and kept under suspension with immediate effect vide sub rule- (1) of Rule 10 of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965.
For kind information no prior explanation was called for.
Again on 22.02.13 I was revoked vide sub-rule(5) of Rule 10 of the CCS(CCA) Rules 1965 and I resumed the duty at the afternoon on 22.02.13.


After 271 days I received the chargesheet on the charge that I failed to maintain devotion to duty and acted in a manner which is unbecoming of a Govt Servant as required under Rule- 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(iii) of CCS(Conduct) Rules-1964.

The fact was like this :-

That I am acting as Supervisor of an office and I could not relieve a subordinate though he had been granted Earned Leave by my disciplinary authority, received through email and that was due to pressure of work and I replied through email like " It is for kind information that as one of the 3 assistants has been on training and only 2 assistants are working the said Sri XXX cannot be relieved on office arrangement".

Now my disc. authority has chargesheeted me and directed me in that memo. to submit within 10 days a written statement of his defence and also to state whether I desire to be heard in person.

So can U kindly help me what statement I have to submit and what is the severity of the case.

With regards

Amaresh Patel   25 October 2013 at 16:09

Regularisation of suspension period

Dear Sir,

I am a central government employee working in the department of Posts, India.
I was made over the suspension order after working hours on 31.01.13 by my disciplinary authority which is not the appointing authority of my present post with the subject :-
A disciplinary proceeding against -- - is contemplated and kept under suspension with immediate effect vide sub rule- (1) of Rule 10 of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965.
For kind information no prior explanation was called for.
Again on 22.02.13 I was revoked vide sub-rule(5) of Rule 10 of the CCS(CCA) Rules 1965 and I resumed the duty at the afternoon on 22.02.13.
Still this I have neither been “communicated the reasons of suspension”/chargesheeted nor finalized my case and so the aforesaid 22 days of suspension period has not been regularized. For the suspension period I have been paid the subsistence allowance only.
Now 8 months have been elapsed. I have not appealed for anything so far.
So I want to know that
1. Is the suspension order now void ? And if so should I represent for regularization of the aforesaid period ?
2. If no what is the time duration within which my case should be finalized ?
3. What are the options for me for the regularization of the aforesaid period of suspension.

With regards.