Provision of law in civil suit
guddu
(Querist) 13 May 2015
This query is : Resolved
I HAVE FILED A SUIT ON SOCIETY REGARDING DISPUTE OF ENTRY IN A BUNGLOW. SOCIETY IS SAYING THAT YOU HAVE AN ENTRY FROM THE BACKSIDE OF THE BUNGLOW WHERE BEDROOM IS SITUTATED. I HAVE CLAIMED THAT I HAVE AN ENTRY FROM THE FRONT OF THE BUNGLOW FROM THE SOCIETY INTERNAL ROAD WHERE DRAWING ROOM IS SITUATED. SOCIETY TRIED TO DISTRUB MY ENTRY FROM THE FRONT SIDE, SO I FILED THE SUIT. OPPOSITE PARTY HAS APPEARED IN THE SUIT AND
AND MOVED AN APPLICATION IN THE COURT IN MY SUIT THAT COURT SHOULD COMPEL ME TO OPEN THE ENTRY FROM BACKSIDE OF THE BUNGLOW AND SHOULD FURTHER ORDER TO CLOSE THE ENTRY FROM THE FRONT SIDE. TRIAL IS ON. DURING TRIAL, OPPOENT HAS PRODUCED A LETTER FROM PLAN PASS AUTHORITY THAT I HAVE AN ENTRY FROM BACKSIDE OF THE BUNGLOW. AFTER THAT I PRODUCED A LETTER FROM PLAN PASS AUTHORITY WHICH STATES THAT ENTRY FROM THE BACKSIDE OF THE BUNGLOW
IS SHOWN IN ORIGINAL PLAN BUT THAT PLAN WAS REVISED AND AS PER REVISED PLAN YOU HAVE ENTRY FROM THE FRONT SIDE. DURING TRIAL I CALLED PLAN PASS AUTHORITY AS MY WITNESS. OPPOSITE COUNSEL HAS CROSS EXAMINED HIM. DURING CROSS EXAMINATION OPPOSITE COUNSEL HAS ASKED THE QUESTION RELATED TO LETTER PRODUCED BY OPPONET WHICH STATES THAT I HAVE AN ENTRY FROM BACKSIDE OF THE BUNGLOW. I OBJECTED THAT QUESTION THAT THIS IS QUESTION IS BEYOND
EXAMINATION IN CHIEF AND IF OPPONET WANTS TO PROVE THE LETTER OF CONTENT WHICH HE HAS PRODUCED SHALL CALL HIM I.E PLAN PASS AUTHORITY AS HIS WITNESS DURING HIS EVIDENCE STAGE. BUT COURT ALLOWED THAT QUESTION TO BE ASKED. AFTER THAT PLAN PASS AUTHORITY HAS REPLIED THAT BOTH LETTERS ARE CORRECT AND I HAVE AN ENTRY FROM BOTH THE SIDES. BUT TODAY I GOT A LETTER WRITTEN BY MY DEFENDANT TO PLAN PASS AUTHORITY ON WHICH THAT LETTER WAS ISSUED BY
PLAN PASS AUTHORITY TO MY DEFENDANT WHICH STATES I HAVE AN ENTRY FROM BACKSIDE. IN THAT LETTER WRITTEN BY MY DEFENADANT STATES THAT TELL ME THE ENTRY OF MY BUNGLOW ON BASIS OF ORIGINAL PLAN BUT THAT HAS REVISED. MY DEFENDANT HAS INTENTIONALLY NOT PRODUCE THAT LETTER AND PLAN PASS AUTHORITY HAS STATED ANYTHING ABOUT THIS LETTER BUT WRONGLY SAID THAT I HAVE AN ENTRY FROM BOTH SIDES. NOW I WANT TO CROSS EXAMINE PLAN PASS AUTHORITY REGARDING
WHERE HE STATES THAT LETTER PRODUCED BY MY DEFENDANT IS CORRECT WHICH STATES I HAVE AN ENTRY FROM BACKSIDE. UNDER WHICH PROVISION SHALL I CROSS EXAMINE PLAN PASS AUTHORITY AND FOR THAT I HAVE TO MADE AN APPLICATION IN COURT.IF YES, WHAT SHOULD BE THE CONTENT OF IT AND IS THERE ANY TIME FRAME TO MADE THIS APPLICATION.
P. Venu
(Expert) 14 May 2015
Are you appearing through a lawyer or party-in-person?
guddu
(Querist) 14 May 2015
party in person
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 14 May 2015
You should prey the court accordingly.
Better hire professional services and also try to get orders for status quo - entry from front till final orders.
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 14 May 2015
query too long.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 15 May 2015
Though you are entitled to appear as party in person, you should be acquainted with the court proceedings properly otherwise you will be stuck this way in between, hence atleast take the help of a an advocate outside the court to help you draft such petitions.
